Bird's suspension

[Tigerpete]

Well thats what im saying, If Luke hadnt broken his jaw, he would've got less, and with bird , had he broken marteene's there's little doubt he would've gone for more. The judicairy should not work liek this, its ridiculous.

 

[Anonymous]

I know pete, i'm agreeing with you and brook on that one mate ;-)

 

[Tigerpete]

I guess at least the system is better than the stupid afl one.

 

[daslacker]

I think injuy should be takin into account.
How long was monas out for?

The player who did it should get 2 weeks more
than the injuried player spents on the sideline.
Wether the injuied player returns to PL or 1st grade.
If a play gets hit by a elbow or whatever and has
to spent 18 weeks on the sideline.Why should the
player who did it get less(11 weeks)?

 

[Tigerpete]

but what about the guy who gang tackles a players and he busts he knee in the tackle? If your injury is gonna determine weather a player should suspended you'll get cases from everywhere, coaches saying "oh look at this tackle , what he intentionally tried to hurt the player"

You cant do it, its just crazy.

 

[daslacker]

I'm talking about a case like o'donnell.

He hit him late and high with an elbow/forearm 1 on 1
that resulted in a broken jaw.
So are you saying in this instance monas should
spent more time on the sideline than o'donnell?

That's crazy

gang tackling is a different story.Injury shouldn't be
taken into account unless there was a high shot or
lifting above the above the horizontal.