Doctor
Bench
- Messages
- 3,612
MACGILL UNAVAILABLE FOR ZIMBABWE TOUR
Oswin Staff Writer - 21/4/2004
Stuart MacGill has opted to make himself unavailable for the Test tour of Zimbabwe for "personal reasons".
The tour is to commence in May, and includes two Tests - MacGill would have been considered a possibility for both Tests.
MacGill,who is currently playing county cricket in England, said he did not believe he could tour Zimbabwe and still maintain a clear conscience.
While Cricket Australia do not plan on canceling the tour due to the current issues surrounding the country, "players with personal concerns will not be forced to tour" according to CEO James Sutherland.
“Our head of cricket operations, Michael Brown, and I have had a number of group and individual discussions with players since before the World Cup and the broad playing group, including with a number who have personal concerns about the ethics and morality of playing in Zimbabwe,” he said.
“We all understand the difficulty and complexity of the issue, but Cricket Australia, the player group and the ACA have agreed that, on balance, playing Zimbabwe cricketers in Zimbabwe is appropriate for the continued development of cricket as a global sport.
“We go there to play cricket with other cricketers to fulfil our obligations to world cricket through the ICC future tours program, and for no other reason.”
Mr Sutherland said he had talked to and understood MacGill’s decision.
"Looking forward, the Australian National Selection Panel will continue to operate under the policy brief of selecting the best available team to represent Australia" he said.
MacGill’s decision not to tour Zimbabwe will not be considered as a factor for future Australian team selections.
MacGill will make a statement at the end of today's play in England (early tomorrow morning Australian time), presumably to outline the reasons for his withdrawal.
_____________________________________________________________
Most will understand "personal concerns" to mean either an ethical dilemma about touring a country with a government supporting racist ideals, or alternatively safety concerns held by MacGill.
It is good to see that the selectors will not make his unavailability for this tour a factor in future selections. However, we've all seen players lose their positions due to injuries and the rise of other players. Martin Love is one example of a player in excellent form who is no longer in contention. Another is Nathan Bracken.
I seriously doubt MacGill's position won't be usurped by another player during the tour - there are too many good players. What if Cameron White performs well, gets a match (unlikely) and performs well (a half century and a 5 wicket haul) - will they still put MacGill in front?
Oswin Staff Writer - 21/4/2004
Stuart MacGill has opted to make himself unavailable for the Test tour of Zimbabwe for "personal reasons".
The tour is to commence in May, and includes two Tests - MacGill would have been considered a possibility for both Tests.
MacGill,who is currently playing county cricket in England, said he did not believe he could tour Zimbabwe and still maintain a clear conscience.
While Cricket Australia do not plan on canceling the tour due to the current issues surrounding the country, "players with personal concerns will not be forced to tour" according to CEO James Sutherland.
“Our head of cricket operations, Michael Brown, and I have had a number of group and individual discussions with players since before the World Cup and the broad playing group, including with a number who have personal concerns about the ethics and morality of playing in Zimbabwe,” he said.
“We all understand the difficulty and complexity of the issue, but Cricket Australia, the player group and the ACA have agreed that, on balance, playing Zimbabwe cricketers in Zimbabwe is appropriate for the continued development of cricket as a global sport.
“We go there to play cricket with other cricketers to fulfil our obligations to world cricket through the ICC future tours program, and for no other reason.”
Mr Sutherland said he had talked to and understood MacGill’s decision.
"Looking forward, the Australian National Selection Panel will continue to operate under the policy brief of selecting the best available team to represent Australia" he said.
MacGill’s decision not to tour Zimbabwe will not be considered as a factor for future Australian team selections.
MacGill will make a statement at the end of today's play in England (early tomorrow morning Australian time), presumably to outline the reasons for his withdrawal.
_____________________________________________________________
Most will understand "personal concerns" to mean either an ethical dilemma about touring a country with a government supporting racist ideals, or alternatively safety concerns held by MacGill.
It is good to see that the selectors will not make his unavailability for this tour a factor in future selections. However, we've all seen players lose their positions due to injuries and the rise of other players. Martin Love is one example of a player in excellent form who is no longer in contention. Another is Nathan Bracken.
I seriously doubt MacGill's position won't be usurped by another player during the tour - there are too many good players. What if Cameron White performs well, gets a match (unlikely) and performs well (a half century and a 5 wicket haul) - will they still put MacGill in front?