What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Brandon Smith

speedster

Bench
Messages
4,399
Yes its all about because he's a Rooster :rolleyes: Frak you are a stupid, one eyed merkin. No point talking to you about anything. My mother always said "don't argue with idiots".
Mate, I'm just being fair and objective about both players. It appears you are not capable of being fair and objective apparently because there is a Rooster involved. Your name calling appears to me to be blatant projecting. Calm down, take a look in the mirror, relieve yourself at your own reflection and have a latte.
 

speedster

Bench
Messages
4,399
I’d stop if I were you. You don’t seem to have any grasp of fundamental principles of evidence and law.
And you don't know the full evidence as yet so take your own advice. Also, I have stopped. It is others having hissy fits like you that are carrying this on!
 

Vlad59

First Grade
Messages
6,364
Mate, I'm just being fair and objective about both players. It appears you are not capable of being fair and objective apparently because there is a Rooster involved. Your name calling appears to me to be blatant projecting. Calm down, take a look in the mirror, relieve yourself at your own reflection and have a latte.
Word of advice mate. When everybody else thinks you are wrong, there is a bloody good chance you are wrong.
 

speedster

Bench
Messages
4,399
Word of advice mate. When everybody else thinks you are wrong, there is a bloody good chance you are wrong.
Mob mentality = lazy logic.

Many have painted me as saying something that I'm not. I'm not saying they can't charge Victor not because being mentioned is only heresay. I know that full well. But I'm not so naive and butt hurt to think that's the full brief of evidence either to this point in time or some point in the future.

Y'know? Make fewer assumptions and hold your fire dummies!
 
Messages
10,960
As for how the NRL deal with this post all the legal shit, I imagine both players should cop some sort of suspension for bringing the game into disrepute.

As for how each club handles it, Smith should cop a final warning whereas, with Rads? How will Uncle Nick spin this given his publicly stated zero tolerance stance on drugs?

I'm getting the popcorn ready ...
The NRL are no longer interested in sanctions for players without allowing them to defend themselves first. Unless it meets a certain threshold and they have enough evidence to run with it.

I think a lot of this stemmed from Brett Stewart in 2009.

Just because Victor Radley's name is in a text, means almost next to nothing. That is not sufficient evidence of his involvement in anything. Unless that's how we want to rule on things now.

That will result in @Manu Vatuvei sending a message to NZ Police that Jackson Ford just dropped a kilo block of the purest Colombian off at his place. Jacko misses the finals, MV wins.
 

speedster

Bench
Messages
4,399
The NRL are no longer interested in sanctions for players without allowing them to defend themselves first. Unless it meets a certain threshold and they have enough evidence to run with it.

I think a lot of this stemmed from Brett Stewart in 2009.

Just because Victor Radley's name is in a text, means almost next to nothing. That is not sufficient evidence of his involvement in anything. Unless that's how we want to rule on things now.

That will result in @Manu Vatuvei sending a message to NZ Police that Jackson Ford just dropped a kilo block of the purest Colombian off at his place. Jacko misses the finals, MV wins.
First of all, my first sentence about the NRL clearly indicated I was talking "post all the legal shit". You have not comprehended what I have said in the post you have quoted. Read it again. Post means after just to assist you there.

For the rest, you appear to be mansplaining heresay to me with the obvious assumption you, like several other merkins previously, think I don't understand what heresay is. Thing is, I do. So, there is no need to repeat that shit again.

My point has been all along that they have bent the rules and trumped things up for Brandon - the polarising guy that everyone on here wants to hate on so, why can't they and why shouldn't they do it for Rads? Oh but we like Rads so suddenly all his fans are strictly by the book when it comes to the letter of the law for Rads. No trumping up charges and bending the letter of the law is allowed for him. Only for cheese because we're all so unbiased and fair minded.

Lol! What a crock of shit.

I've had enough of this bias but particularly those that have implied or straight accused me of bias and made it personal against me (not you Penrose). What a bunch of f**ken bitches! You can have your f**ken bitch fest and point your fingers and besmirch everyone that doesn't share your views all you like.

I'm done with this bullshit! This is meant to be a hate on Cheese thread and here I am daring to be balanced and not join in the pile on. Back to hating on Cheese. Go for your lives merkins!
 
Last edited:

Vlad59

First Grade
Messages
6,364
First of all, my first sentence about the NRL clearly indicated I was talking "post all the legal shit". You have not comprehended what I have said in the post you have quoted. Read it again. Post means after just to assist you there.

For the rest, you appear to be mansplaining heresay to me with the obvious assumption you, like several other merkins previously, think I don't understand what heresay is. Thing is, I do. So, there is no need to repeat that shit again.

My point has been all along that they have bent the rules and trumped things up for Brandon - the polarising guy that everyone on here was to hate on so, why can't they and why shouldn't they do it for Rads? Oh but we like Rads so suddenly all his fans are strictly by the book when it comes to the letter of the law for Rads. No trumping up charges and bending the letter of the law is allowed for him. Only for cheese because we're all so unbiased and fair minded.

Lol! What a crock of shit.

I've had enough of this bias but particularly those that have implied or straight accused me of bias and made it personal against me. What a bunch of f**ken bitches! You can have your f**ken bitch fest and point your fingers and besmirch everyone that doesn't share your views all you like.

I'm done with this bullshit! Go for your lives merkins!
I’ve never seen anybody so completely ignorant of how legal proceedings or due process work as you. No one agrees with you mate. Have you worked out why yet?
 

speedster

Bench
Messages
4,399
I’ve never seen anybody so completely ignorant of how legal proceedings or due process work as you. No one agrees with you mate. Have you worked out why yet?
The legal proceedings you speak of haven't begun yet you dumbf**k! This conversation is about police laying charges. How ignorant are you being right now?
 

Vlad59

First Grade
Messages
6,364
The legal proceedings you speak of haven't begun yet you dumbf**k! This conversation is about police laying charges. How ignorant are you being right now?
I said you don’t understand the concepts. It’s pretty pathetic when you have to lie mate. You’ve made a complete fool of yourself here and you keep digging yourself deeper into new levels of stupidity .
 

yobbo84

Coach
Messages
13,385
I feel like "recreational" drugs are one of those issues where being partisan helps no-one.

We either turn a blind eye / slap with a wet lettuce everyone involved - as the NRL has done in the past - or come down hard and start deregistering guilty parties for 12+ months.

The NRL can keep ignoring how vast of a problem it is, or come down hard, deregister any player involved, and draw a line in the sand.
 
Top