Meanie said:What? The guy missed half this year with injury, how the hell does he need time to mend?
aids said:not enough to recover
and if you have to wear a specailly made neck brace to play, you probably need to re-evulate your situation
he is a good player, but i think he is going top cuase himself a lot of injury
Meanie said:Do you even know a thing about Tate's situation?
aids said:i know what i've seen of him
that being suring the tigers/broncs game, during EVERY break in play berrigan was stretching his shoulder and back.
and the commentary team tonight said he will be wearing that brace for the rest of his playing carrer.
so i would assume, he is still carrying an injury
but tell me captain science, what is his condition?
aids said:i know what i've seen of him
that being suring the tigers/broncs game, during EVERY break in play berrigan was stretching his shoulder and back.
and the commentary team tonight said he will be wearing that brace for the rest of his playing carrer.
so i would assume, he is still carrying an injury
but tell me captain science, what is his condition?
ParraDude_Jay said:When Tate's head flies back (probably because of his massive f**king jaw and the wind) it crushes the nerves in his neck, the brace stops it from flying back so far and he does himself no more harm. It looks bloody stupid though, and he wants to patent it aswell, what a joke. I hate him.
As for his game, as good as he was, HE DIDN'T DESERVE TO BE SELECTED ON THE FORM HE SHOWED IN 2005. A good game doesn't justify his selection, for it should never have happened in the first place.
Big Pete said:I see you didn't watch any Broncos games from Round 26 on-wards.
Big Pete said:I see you didn't watch any Broncos games from Round 26 on-wards.
You'd rate Ben Smith right as a defender, one of the best right? Tate broke him twice, I don't see a lot of players doing that.
Tate deserves his selection, tonight just proved it.
ParraDude_Jay said:You just shot yourself in the foot for this argument with that statement.
I'll freely admit he was great from round 26, but that's 3 games. 3 GAMES MAKES UP FOR A SEASON OF MEDIOCRITY?!?!
That's bullsh*t Pete, take your bloody Broncos goggles off for a minute, please.
ParraDude_Jay said:You just shot yourself in the foot for this argument with that statement.
I'll freely admit he was great from round 26, but that's 3 games. 3 GAMES MAKES UP FOR A SEASON OF MEDIOCRITY?!?!
That's bullsh*t Pete, take your bloody Broncos goggles off for a minute, please.
Big Pete said:I wasn't saying he was a bad player before hand, just that he was in-form which a lot of people are harping about.
Tate was going going from solid to good and was improving until he got injured.
Then he came back from an injury many people thought had ended his career and played an important roles in many matches. Besides from that he has experience in test matches, besides from that he showed he had more combonation with Lockyer (which we didn't see tonight) which would help his cause into making the side.
Also who would you prefer?