What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Brett Stewart Drinking with Diabetes?

BradtheRipper

Juniors
Messages
162
Hey ya'll, im a type1 diabetic from the gong, as is brett. theres noway he could have done this as we are not allowed to get drunk. if so, does brett get smashed on one schooner. i felt sorry for him at the Grandfinal celebrations and thought thats why he had to go get that new case of beer. does anyone know if he drinks, if so this is seriously damaging his life health?- he is also a diabetes australia ambassador.
does manly have the cure for diabetes coz i wana get smashed again before i die?
 

Micistm

Bench
Messages
4,470
Slightly off topic but still on Brett, I really feel for the guy.

I'm a Warriors man so it's in my best interests if he's stood down for round 2(!), but I do not believe he should.
This is typical knock down a big name media B.S at this stage. I'm not saying he's innocent...nor am I saying he's guilty. I don't know, but the point is neither do all the tossers in the media hounding him. He deserves a fair go and to be assumed innocent until PROVEN guilty.
From what I understand he's a fairly quiet guy with a thin skin, and quite distraught at all this. I feel so sorry for him- But support the guy until facts come out to the contrary of innocence. And if this is all found to be false, a beat up, or some sort of extortion thing...the full force of the law should be used, it's a guys life, credibility and career put on the line.
 

squiddy

Juniors
Messages
1,171
Drinking to that extent with diabetes shows you what a goose he really is , I'm surprised none of his team mates or official staff stepped in knowing his condition
 
Messages
3,070
Drinking to that extent with diabetes shows you what a goose he really is , I'm surprised none of his team mates or official staff stepped in knowing his condition

To what extent exactly ?

Dont tell me.............another goose poster who knows SFA & cant answer the question.
 

OzDave

Juniors
Messages
18
Slightly off topic but still on Brett, I really feel for the guy.

I'm a Warriors man so it's in my best interests if he's stood down for round 2(!), but I do not believe he should.
This is typical knock down a big name media B.S at this stage. I'm not saying he's innocent...nor am I saying he's guilty. I don't know, but the point is neither do all the tossers in the media hounding him. He deserves a fair go and to be assumed innocent until PROVEN guilty.
From what I understand he's a fairly quiet guy with a thin skin, and quite distraught at all this. I feel so sorry for him- But support the guy until facts come out to the contrary of innocence. And if this is all found to be false, a beat up, or some sort of extortion thing...the full force of the law should be used, it's a guys life, credibility and career put on the line.

Fact: Brett was drunk at a public function
Fact: He was refused service because of his intoxication
Fact: He was aware he was the 'face of league' in the media launch due the next day.
Fact: There is a code of conduct which he AND Manly broke.
Fact: The sexual assault allegation has yet to be treated by the NRL, but will be when the case is decided.

Finally, I can say, the NRL has acted calmly and sensibly. It remains to be seen if Manly wake up to themselves. The drunk board member at their meeting last night does not look good.
 

Micistm

Bench
Messages
4,470
Drunk at a public function: Is that a crime? In that case I know tons of crims on a weekly basis. I don't drink personally, for budget and fear of hangovers reasons but to my knowledge that is not illegal
Refused entrance/service due to intoxication: Again, I have yet to see anyone arrested for this, just turned away
He was aware he was the face of league:Yes I'm sure he is aware he was in the plans for '09. If he was wasted that is a fair point it was pretty dumb to do so, given it's a week out and just launched.

The code of conduct and sexual assualt charges: I'm not denying there is much here that doesn't look or sound good. But I also know I am hearing different reports from different media busting themselves to get news, and quoting anyone who was within 5kms of the incident.
All I am saying is I feel for him as his career is on the line, his reputation...and I will reserve judgement until the full facts come out and he is given his day in court. I will not join the trendy club of kicking him when he's down...at least until the full truth and story comes out. I think that's fair.
 

Jonesy

Juniors
Messages
18
Brett was drunk at a public function
Fact: He was refused service because of his intoxication

- not fact, it was a members / sponsors only funciton and it finished at 3pm, he was intoxicated yes but it's not illegal to be drunk and i know plenty of people who have been refused service at the wharf bar.

Fact: He was aware he was the 'face of league' in the media launch due the next day.

- And this is his fualt why? no conviciton against him has been made only allegaitons.

Fact: There is a code of conduct which he AND Manly broke.

- Digging this up is the biggest piece of bullsh*t gallop has done ever, By the definition in this code any player drinking at a club funciton should be suspended (Please note the alleged incident didn't even happen at the event.)

Fact: The sexual assault allegation has yet to be treated by the NRL, but will be when the case is decided.

- using the code of conduct to ban stewart is their loophole as going direct owuld never stand up don't kid your self mate the NRL isn't stupid.

Finally, I can say, the NRL has acted calmly and sensibly. It remains to be seen if Manly wake up to themselves. The drunk board member at their meeting last night does not look good.

- The NRL have done what they always do react to media hype rather than taking into consideraiton the quite possible fact that the player is innoncent until proven guilty.



Long and the short of it is, if the manly funciton wasn't on that afternoon and the same allegaitosn were made owuld stewart be stood down? Yes the NRL are trying to find any way to get him out of the game in the interim basically convicting him due ot his own fame. No facts have been released by the police over the alleged assault and we won't know until the court case the NRL have massive double standards (Lockyer last year was drunk and played after takcing a security guard) Countless other players have been drunk and not suspended it's a joke and i am suprised Manly isnt desputing the Ban as i think they have an easy case to argue.
 
Last edited:

squiddy

Juniors
Messages
1,171
To what extent exactly ?

Dont tell me.............another goose poster who knows SFA & cant answer the question.


Hey Jatz - do some research buddy , alcohol can trigger a very VERY serious episodes and reactions if you have diabetes , I'll repeat if he was drinking to excess ( as he himself stated " he was too drunk to remember " and also he was refused service at 2 other bars ) and not eating with his condition he was asking for serious health troubles .

BTW this is the defence Bellew is putting forward - never mind that he should take some responsibilty for himself - as is the case these days lets look for an excuse or someone else to blame and shirk all personal responsibilities.

Any other questions mate ?
 

Oldboy

Juniors
Messages
55
http://www.leaguehq.com.au/news/new...hat-he-wasdoing/2009/03/10/1236447217385.html


Diabetes defence: Stewart could argue he didn't know what he was doing
Brad Walter, Julie Robotham and Les Kennedy | March 11, 2009

THE effect of excessive alcohol on Brett Stewart's Type 1 diabetes may be used as a defence against allegations he sexually abused a 17-year-old woman.

After a four-day investigation, Stewart was last night charged with the sexual assault of the teenager just hours after Manly's alcohol-fuelled season launch last Friday afternoon.

Despite not yet having the results of DNA testing Stewart submitted to at Dee Why Police Station in the early hours of Saturday morning, there was considered to be sufficient evidence to charge him.

The teenager who made the complaint also provided a DNA sample and was examined by a doctor at Royal North Shore Hospital after claiming she had been sexually assaulted by Stuart about 8pm on Friday night. It took just five minutes from the time of the first telephone call to the Emergency 000 hotline at 8.01pm to when police officers arrived on scene at North Manly on Friday night.

One of the callers told the operator of an altercation involving "Brett Stewart".

Those who saw Stewart on the night said he was intoxicated and he has told friends he can't remember what happened.

A leading expert in diabetes, Paul Zimmet, the emeritus director of Melbourne's Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, said people with Type 1 diabetes were at risk of having a hypoglycemic attack - or blood-sugar crash - as a result of excessive drinking, especially on an empty stomach. The effects of drinking could then compound the problem, by impairing the person's ability to recognise the symptoms of the drop in blood sugar levels - which include changes to sensory perception and consciousness.

Alcohol could make the liver more sensitive to insulin, increasing the likelihood of hypoglycemia, Professor Zimmet said. But this depended on individual factors, as well as the form of alcohol and the circumstances in which it was consumed.

Drinking a lot of beer could push blood sugar up because it was heavy in carbohydrates, Professor Zimmet said.

People with type 1 diabetes - the childhood onset form that makes up one in 10 cases and is not linked to obesity or lack of exercise - were advised they could safely drink alcohol in the same quantities recommended for other adults, he said. But they were advised to eat carbohydrate foods such as pasta or bread before or during drinking, to counterbalance the effect on blood sugar.

His condition would make it possible for Stewart to argue, "he didn't know what he was doing and didn't eat properly," said Professor Zimmet.

Stewart has worked as an ambassador for support and advocacy group Diabetes Australia NSW, which yesterday said in a statement on its website that it was surprised by the allegation. "He has been active in supporting a number of our events and his conduct has always been exemplary," the statement read.

A spokeswoman said the organisation would not comment further pending the police investigation, and she would not say whether the group would consider cutting ties with Stewart if he was charged.

In another development yesterday, Paul Durazza, the Sea Eagle sponsor allegedly punched by Anthony Watmough at Manly's season launch last Friday, says the footballer was harassing his daughter at the time.

Yesterday Durazza, who runs a structural landscaping and property maintenance business, rang 2UE after Manly co-owner Max Delmege was interviewed and defended Watmough as a "great guy".

Durazza said he saw Watmough hassling his 21-year-old daughter at the sponsors' function at the Manly Wharf Hotel. "[She is] a very attractive lady and didn't need to be spoken to how she was being spoken to," Durazza said.

"He was just very rude and that's what sparked me to get up and then he hit me."

He said the incident, which has been reported as a slap, was more serious. "He punched me. It wasn't a slap. It was a punch," he said .
 

Latest posts

Top