Broncos 98 vs. Raiders 94

[dubby]

Charles, you are reputed for twisting the story to suit yourself, and here is a good example. I merely said that the Riaders were a quicker team. You reply and say :blahb: about how quick the Broncos were. So i reply saying how quick the Raiders team were. Now you call me a speed freaK?](*,)

Man, you jump around more than a toad on a hot road.

Let it go Charles, let it go .

THe Raiders would have one anyday.

 

[Mr Saab]

you are the one that said the only 2 players the broncos had that were threatening were alf and kevvie. Do you admit that that was a stupid statement and ill informed?
Geez players like renouf, lockyer, tallis, webcke, sailor...they are not threatening at all are they??????? Idiot

 

[dubby]

Langer and Walters were the BIGGEST threat. My bad there.

 

[circling eagle]

Too bad teams like this cant be bottle and trotted out every now and then, they were two awesome sides that could have beaten any team on their day, went with the raiders cause they were a pleasure to watch every game.

 

[pennywisealfie]

i think broncos 92 and raiders 90 were better.

broncos 98 for sure! they won the comp by 6 points and never looked like being touched, won the gf by a mile. raiders 94 didnt even win the minor premiership and they werent even faves to win the gf, raiders played good on the day and won quite comfortably. pretty much the same broncos side won 5 premierships whereas the raiders only won 3

 

[canberra_raiders2k2]

The Raiders sure have dropped since then lol..

We now have no attack and a no game tactics besides the odd one or two..at least our cheerleaders got hotter.

 

[Big Pete]

Hard one to pick.

However it's like comparing Lewis to Johns, you can't different eras and so on.

 

[Jono078]

i think broncos 92 and raiders 90 were better.

broncos 98 for sure! they won the comp by 6 points and never looked like being touched, won the gf by a mile. raiders 94 didnt even win the minor premiership and they werent even faves to win the gf, raiders played good on the day and won quite comfortably. pretty much the same broncos side won 5 premierships whereas the raiders only won 3

What do you mean they won by 6 points ?
Didnt the top half of the ladder look something like this, only 7 points between them and 7th :?

Team Played Won Draw Loss For Agn Diff Pts
1st Broncos 24 18 1 5 688 310 378 37
2nd Knights 24 18 1 5 562 381 181 37
3rd Storm 24 17 1 6 546 372 174 35
4th Eels 24 17 1 6 468 349 119 35
5th Nrt Sydney 24 17 7 663 367 296 34
6th Roosters 24 16 8 680 383 297 32
7th Raiders 24 15 9 564 429 135 30

 

[Ghoulies]

He must be talking about '00, though even then I'm not sure it was 6.

 

[Jono078]

Yeah, 2000 was exactly 6 points

1st Broncos 26 18 2 6 696 388 308 38
2nd Roosters 26 16 10 601 520 81 32
3rd Knights 26 15 1 10 686 532 154 31
4th Raiders 26 15 11 506 479 27 30
5th Panthers 26 15 11 573 562 11 30
6th Storm 26 14 1 11 672 529 143 29
7th Eels 26 14 1 11 476 456 20 29
8th Sharks 26 13 13 570 463 107 26

 

[PARANoIR]

Raiders 94 in a canter.

 

[MrSharky]

f**k I remember the 2000 Semi up @ ANZ...

All I have to say is: F**k you Russel Richardson!... Oh and f**k you Langer...

Losing from 20-0 up @ HT... what a disgrace...

Still makes me angry.

 

[aqua_duck]

i think broncos 92 and raiders 90 were better.

broncos 98 for sure! they won the comp by 6 points and never looked like being touched, won the gf by a mile. raiders 94 didnt even win the minor premiership and they werent even faves to win the gf, raiders played good on the day and won quite comfortably. pretty much the same broncos side won 5 premierships whereas the raiders only won 3

both sides played the dogs in the final and you have to say the bulldogs 94 side was stronger than the bulldogs 98 side.

 

[Balkey]

The Raiders by 20. The raiders in the 94 grand final played almost the perfect game and would have betan most in the big one

 

[Raider_69]

The Raiders sure have dropped since then lol..

We now have no attack and a no game tactics besides the odd one or two..at least our cheerleaders got hotter.

its been a long sad road over the past 10 odd years
seeing possibly the greatest attacking team of all time, most certainly (imo) in recent history slowly deteriorate into a pile of sh*te, with no idea on attack and a game plan that looks like its come from the back of a Weeties box... of course under the watchful eyes of Mal Meninga and Mathew Elliott :roll:

how the mighty have fallen

 

[Jono078]

its been a long sad road over the past 10 odd years
seeing possibly the greatest attacking team of all time, most certainly (imo) in recent history slowly deteriorate into a pile of sh*te, with no idea on attack and a game plan that looks like its come from the back of a Weeties box... of course under the watchful eyes of Mal Meninga and Mathew Elliott :roll:

how the mighty have fallen

That would have to goto Parra of 2001? Averaging 32.3 points per match? Best average since 1998 is all I know anyway.

 

[RABK]

Yep, Parra 01, Dogs 04 and Knights 01 are the best.

 

[Raider_69]

stats wise maybe, but none on them could of held a candle to the potential scoring power of the 94 raiders team when on song IMO... Mullins, Nadrunku, Meninga, Wiki, Nagas... that backline is damn near untameable, particuarly when two blokes by the name of Ricky Stuart and Laurie Daley are making life easy

 

[Raiders Plight]

That would have to goto Parra of 2001? Averaging 32.3 points per match? Best average since 1998 is all I know anyway.

Well we didn't have jason taylor to kick goals for us, we had david furner who was solid but not one of the great goal kickers. But if you want to get technical raiders 94 averaged more tries per game.

127 in 22 games/ 5.77 tries per game
142 in 26 games/5.46 tries per game

 

[Edwahu]

The game is much faster these days and momentumn is alot harder to stop hence a lot more points are been scored.

Its amazing that Canberras 94 average tries is still up there.