What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Buddha in the box: Why Ivan Cleary is the Zen master

Goonji

Juniors
Messages
519
Having won the past four premierships in a row, the Panthers again began the season as title favourites. But a diabolical start has put the pressure on Ivan Cleary - not that you’d know by watching him during a game.

ByRoy Masters
May 9, 2025

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/buddha...cleary-is-the-zen-master-20250506-p5lwws.html

When does a dynasty die? There is no knowing when the end begins. Ivan Cleary, coach of the Panthers – who have won the past four NRL premierships but are now on a lowly ladder position, says, “I’m not even sure of the exact definition of a dynasty. Have we had one, or are we still in one at Penrith? There is no such thing as a machine in perpetual motion. At some point, you’ve got to stop for fuel.”

He agrees the continual loss of players in the salary cap era, including three top-class ones at the end of the 2024 season – James Fisher-Harris, their physically dominant forward leader; Jarome Luai, the attacking foil for his own son, Nathan, and Sunia Turuva, a first-half tryscorer in last year’s grand final - helps drain the tank.

As will the coming loss of co-captain Isaah Yeo, Liam Martin, Cleary and possibly fullback Dylan Edwards to the NSW team, making it difficult to win enough games to make this year’s top eight. Nor did results up to Magic Round suggest their replacements, despite being the product of the NRL’s best assembly line, would help the Panthers peat, let alone five-peat.

“All that adds to it possibly ending,” says Cleary, on the eve of his team’s comprehensive 32-8 win over the Broncos in Brisbane. The victory is a timely warning that it is foolish to proclaim the death of a dynasty.

There is no voice of doom from the top of the Blue Mountains saying the club is slipping down to the lowlands where the also-rans live. Melbourne is described as a dynasty, yet the club has never won consecutive premierships.

If Cleary has doubts about the end of a dynasty, he has certainty about its beginning . When the Panthers were beaten 26-20 by Melbourne in the 2020 grand final, he told reporters, “I’d love to have the game tomorrow, that’s for sure.”

Asked about it now, he says, “I genuinely meant it. I felt like we ran out of time. I felt like I’d like to have the first half again and it would have been enough. Although the play-offs had been tight, everything in the grand final went faster. The Storm’s line speed was fantastic. We made a few mistakes. Nathan threw an intercept and couldn’t get it out of his head. But I also thought at the time that this is part of the journey. And it was.”

If there are any doubts this was the game that motivated Penrith, the Panthers players made it obvious in their redemptive victory over Melbourne last year.

It has never been previously reported but some of the Storm’s younger players were shocked at the vitriol Penrith spewed at them as they stood behind the posts after a try. Luai had not forgotten the “get back to Mount Druitt” slur from the Storm’s Jahrome Hughes. The Fibro versus Silvertail ethos of under-privilege persists in Sydney’s western suburbs and Cleary, who has lived in Penrith for 14 years and still owns a house in the northern beaches, makes no apology for any sledging. “It was still remembered,” he said. “We learnt a lot from the 2020 grand final, including a lot of stuff that happened off the ball.”

Cleary had coached more than 370 games by the time he won his first premiership. He had previously coached the Warriors, Panthers and Wests Tigers before returning to Penrith.

It sounds ludicrous to suggest a man with all that experience, including taking the Warriors to the 2011 grand final, would grow as a coach along with his young team but he agrees. “Definitely,” he says. “My career had all been about rebuild. By the time I got back to Penrith, it was the first time I actually thought I had a team that could win a grand final. I could see green shoots and blue sky.”

He admits he feared for his reputation. “I wondered whether I would be the guy who was only known for dragging teams up out of the gutter and not reaching the top. I have definitely grown as coach along the way with these players.”

Penrith have led a tactical revolution in the NRL, using their back five to create field position and hence balance the energy output of backs and forwards. “Part of that decision was personnel,” says Cleary with reference to the power of the now injured winger Brian To’o and fullback Edwards returning the ball to near halfway. “The beauty of the back five is that they can get the forwards thinking about defence. All our stats in the game are about attack but I’ve always believed defence wins games and attack decides by how much.”

Some observers believe the Panthers led in exploiting the six-again rule by deliberately conceding breaches early in the tackle count to trap a team in its own 40-metre zone. “We definitely didn’t do it deliberately,” Cleary says. “We place a lot of emphasis on controlling the ruck and line speed but the breaches weren’t deliberate.”

He does admit to introducing the ruse of blockers preventing opposition players from hurrying the kicker. The Storm’s Christian Welch was particularly effective harassing Nathan in the 2020 grand final and Penrith’s sophisticated blocking system was the response.

“I’ll take that as a compliment,” Cleary says, before conceding the NRL subsequently did the job for him by penalising any player who makes contact with a kicker. “Halves now have a level of protection on kicks.”

He also pleads guilty to the recent scrum ploy of the half placing the ball on the ground and retreating to first receiver in the backline, while a scrum player picks it up and feeds the ball. Insofar as it adds a man to the backline, it creates an overlap. “The Roosters did it to us and scored a try,” Cleary admits.

He wasn’t resentful he had been punished by his own invention. “I thought at the time, ‘That is pretty cool, too.’” He explains the ploy came in response to the NRL ban on teams holding the ball at the base of the scrum. “A lot of scrum tries came from that but the NRL stopped it and now they have done it again by making us re-start the scrum feed.”

However, he concedes the NRL’s relentless mission to increase ball in play time by reducing stoppages has benefitted Penrith and Melbourne. “The continuity has helped us,” he agrees. “The six-again rule has been good for us but most of the calls you don’t know what they are for.” He echoes the complaint of all coaches that referees can use repeat sets to even up a game.

He welcomes a review of the salary cap, saying, “Penrith doesn’t get any rewards for players developed in our pathways going to other clubs as NRL players. We are doing a good job for the NRL producing players.”

Luai left after four premierships, including leading the team last year in place of an injured Nathan who also missed NSW’s Origin winning series in which Luai played a stellar role. Asked if the Panthers under-valued the five-eighth, Cleary said, “I definitely did not under-estimate him. We fought tooth and nail to keep him. We couldn’t get near the money he was offered plus he wanted to forge his own path. I’m proud of what he is doing at Wests Tigers but I wish he was here.”

Like his colleagues, he rails against the NRL draw which resembles something dreamed up by muppets Ernie and Bert. Penrith’s Origin players are required to play a 3pm match on a Saturday in Auckland after the Wednesday evening Origin encounter in Perth. “They [Penrith’s Origin representatives] won’t be playing in Auckland,” Cleary said.“It’s ridiculous. I don’t have a choice.”

So, let’s go back to that 2020 grand final - the beginning of the Penrith dynasty. Would Cleary have liked a time-out, as they have in US sports, where a coach can stop the game and settle the players. “If we were able to have them, that’s the sort of game where it would have helped,” he said. “But in the NRL we have time-outs for things we don’t want time-outs for.”

As he sits in the coach’s box at games, awaiting the Bunker’s decision, he looks composed while his rivals stress and fume. “Underneath the surface, I ride all the highs and lows, just like the other coaches,” he reveals.

He is not fussed over the chatter whether the Panthers happy hour of a half decade is over. Time is famously impatient. It flies, it marches on, it waits for no-one. Yet things change quickly in the NRL.

Prior to Magic Round, time stood next to Cleary, cruelly tapping its wristwatch. Yet he betrays no hint time has run out for the Panthers, as it did in 2020. “Regardless of what happens to us, whether it is now, next year, we’ll have every chance of success in the years to come,” he says with the Zen-like calm that shields the emotions which roil within.
 
Messages
58
I recently read his book.

I normally shy away from the bland, hackneyed tripe of biographies about sporting identities (especially Australian ones). However, it was a gift given to me before a series of long-haul flights so I gave it a read.

A very light-weight tale with the usual hammering of buzz words like "consistency" "culture" "buy-in".

The "themes" they used to inspire their premiership success were laughable: 'we imagined we were climbing Everest', 'we imagined we were in Top Gun and gave each other call signs', 'we made a WWE-style belt'.

The most poignant and powerful moment was when he took an anti-depressant...

The true essence of this clubs success was that he is an just a regular, perhaps slightly better than average coach, who was BLESSED with a glut of extremely talented, committed and tight-knit players. He was in the right place at the right time.

Given the path ahead for us, I think his next book might be a bit more interesting...
 

The Realist

Juniors
Messages
2,058
I recently read his book.

I normally shy away from the bland, hackneyed tripe of biographies about sporting identities (especially Australian ones). However, it was a gift given to me before a series of long-haul flights so I gave it a read.

A very light-weight tale with the usual hammering of buzz words like "consistency" "culture" "buy-in".

The "themes" they used to inspire their premiership success were laughable: 'we imagined we were climbing Everest', 'we imagined we were in Top Gun and gave each other call signs', 'we made a WWE-style belt'.

The most poignant and powerful moment was when he took an anti-depressant...

The true essence of this clubs success was that he is an just a regular, perhaps slightly better than average coach, who was BLESSED with a glut of extremely talented, committed and tight-knit players. He was in the right place at the right time.

Given the path ahead for us, I think his next book might be a bit more interesting...

Thanks for the review. I still share that view of Ivan. I think Strategically and tactically he is a slightly above average coach and I would also agree that he was blessed with a stacked squad who had the right attributes that just happen to gel very well with Ivans coaching style.

The real test of his abilities as a you say, lies ahead and will truly define his legacy.
 

age.s

First Grade
Messages
8,196
I find it strange that we routinely accept the Westminster responsibility framework for coaches who's teams perform poorly, ie, yes the players are going badly, but the buck stops with the coach, but don't do the same in giving credit when a team performs well, or unprecedentally well. The idea that Ivan has just stumbled into this level of success is fanciful. It's just not how high performance organisations work. Yes you can have players who contribute heavily, both from a talent and culture perspective, but without great leadership it falls apart.

The idea that Ivan hasn't meaningfully contributed to both the on field development of the squad and the culture that supports it is simply not believable. I could believe that an average coach with great players could win one premiership. Two at an absolute stretch. Not four straight. Not a chance.

As others say though the renewal of the squad will be a huge test.
 

Fangs

Coach
Messages
16,010
Ivan is well above average when it comes to the strategy for the season. I'd argue only Bellamy is potentially ahead of him.

Total opposite to a guy like Matt Elliott. His teams reached as high as 2nd on the ladder. Yet everyone knew they were cannon fodder. Come the big matches they fell flat on their face.

This side has peaked at the right time 4 years straight. That is more than a talented roster.

As for the wrestling belt, Everest etc. It sounds kinda dumb but it works when your people buy in. Sports psychology is an underrated topic and I think this falls into that conversation.
 

Aliceinwonderland

First Grade
Messages
8,214
I find it strange that we routinely accept the Westminster responsibility framework for coaches who's teams perform poorly, ie, yes the players are going badly, but the buck stops with the coach, but don't do the same in giving credit when a team performs well, or unprecedentally well. The idea that Ivan has just stumbled into this level of success is fanciful. It's just not how high performance organisations work. Yes you can have players who contribute heavily, both from a talent and culture perspective, but without great leadership it falls apart.

The idea that Ivan hasn't meaningfully contributed to both the on field development of the squad and the culture that supports it is simply not believable. I could believe that an average coach with great players could win one premiership. Two at an absolute stretch. Not four straight. Not a chance.

As others say though the renewal of the squad will be a huge test.

My thoughts exactly.
 

The Realist

Juniors
Messages
2,058
I find it strange that we routinely accept the Westminster responsibility framework for coaches who's teams perform poorly, ie, yes the players are going badly, but the buck stops with the coach, but don't do the same in giving credit when a team performs well, or unprecedentally well. The idea that Ivan has just stumbled into this level of success is fanciful. It's just not how high performance organisations work. Yes you can have players who contribute heavily, both from a talent and culture perspective, but without great leadership it falls apart.

The idea that Ivan hasn't meaningfully contributed to both the on field development of the squad and the culture that supports it is simply not believable. I could believe that an average coach with great players could win one premiership. Two at an absolute stretch. Not four straight. Not a chance.

As others say though the renewal of the squad will be a huge test.

I would argue that our run of success was a hugely collaborative effort. Gus of course started it and he sowed many of the seeds for our success even though he left before we reaped the benefits. He was a big part in building our stacked roster, as well as creating the academy, upgrading our facilities in general, hiring the right people etc etc.

Maloney mentioned in a podcast recently how Ciraldo was building our defensive systems even when he was still with us and that it takes time. It all seemed to kick in around 2020 and it still had enough momentum
to continue after he left (though you can argue that a few years on the 'Ciraldo effect' is starting to wear off).

Then you have Matt Cameron. I often wonder how much of an impact his orchestrating had behind the scenes after Gus left. He's had to juggle not only the constant turnover of players but also coaching staff. I saw a video of him earlier this year where he talks about how we identify players and how Talent is a secondary consideration when compared to Character. It seems he shares this philosophy with Ivan but I do wonder how much of this is driven by Matt specifically.

I should clarify however that I think that Ivan is a good (but not brilliant) strategist. I think tactics is his real weak point and is probably the biggest source of frustration in this forum, particularly with his bench selection and usage.

I still stand by the notion that Ivans true test is the next 5 years. Now that the FTA Brotherhood (and associated enthusiasm) has gone, his players are aging, the golden harvest sown by Gus is mostly used up and his most impactful assistant is now a receding memory, we will truly see how good he is.

Remember that most people thought the Storm and Bellamy would be 'done' when the Big 4 (then 3) aged out and retired.

Yet he reinvented and rebuilt the squad a few times since, has won more premierships (and would have more if it weren't for us!) and has kept his team a genuine premiership threat every year throughout the process.

Time will tell if Ivan will be able to emulate Bellamy. I sure hope he does though I would say that I'm 'cautiously optimistic'.
 

John Hamblin

Juniors
Messages
1,095
The Panthers under IC have changed the game. The back 5 taking the early hit ups so the forwards can have a rest to load up when the opposition have the ball etc. Another thing that I like is that all of the outside backs have a good short kicking game and use this to either score tries or pin the opposition in their ingoal area.

IC deserves an enormous amount of credit. Other teams have copied our style. That is the epitome of flattery.

Also the enormous amount of pleasure our team has given me personally over the last 5 years is immeasurable!!
 

Pomoz

Bench
Messages
3,022
I recently read his book.
.......

A very light-weight tale with the usual hammering of buzz words like "consistency" "culture" "buy-in".

.......

The true essence of this clubs success was that he is an just a regular, perhaps slightly better than average coach, who was BLESSED with a glut of extremely talented, committed and tight-knit players. He was in the right place at the right time.

Given the path ahead for us, I think his next book might be a bit more interesting...
You have got to feel sorry for coaches, as age.s put it, team good, its the players, team bad, its the coach. To be called just above average when you have taken two different teams to a total of six GF's and won four in a row, is an incredible insult.

You may call them "buzz words" but consistency, culture and buy in are exactly the values that elite organisations the world over believe in and practice. Easy to say and hard to do. It means taking hard steps like getting rid of top performing players that just don't have the right values. RCG was moved on for precisely those reasons. Blake the same. RCG was a representative level prop, he has gone on to play in a grand final for the Eels, yet out he went.

Read some of the excellent books by ex GE CEO Jack Welch (Jack:Straight from the Guts for example). He said the hardest thing was getting rid of the good performers who just didn't buy in to what they were trying to do and subtly undermined the team ethos. He built an organisation that delivered 15% growth for ten years, an almost unheard of growth when you consider the industries they were in.

Read about how the SAS select recruits and the Navy Seals. Values are everything, talent is a bonus. You may be the fittest and best soldier in the world, but if you are a selfish prick, you will not pass selection, simple as.

Last year the Panthers let Taylan May leave, not because he was a bad player, in fact who much would we like to have him now, but his behaviour didn't fit with the values the team live by.

Contrast this with the Broncos. Ezra Mam injures a family driving under the influence of drugs and just for good measure, he didn't have a licence. He will play this weekend after a paltry nine week suspension. Is he a good team player? Would you trust him to do the right thing when times are tough? Maybe Madge can straighten him out, but the example he has set doesn't bode well for their team.

There may have been some great talent that came through at the Panthers, but they didn't arrive as the finished article. Who coached them? Were they going to be champions anyway, Cleary had no influence?

If you look at the star teams of the past, most commentators say the Broncos and the Raiders teams were better than the four-peat Panthers. Where is our shining star? Our Renouf, our Daley, Webke, Hancock, Meninga, Stuart, where are the superstars? According to everybody most of our players would be lucky to be on the bench of these great teams. We aren't flash and exciting to watch. No Mullins or Renouf flashes of brilliance, no barnstorming Meninga runs finished off by the slashing speed of Daley. Nobody tough like Webke or Lazarus. As the great English football song goes 'we are shit and we know we are".

We have nothing. A slightly above average coach who inherited a bunch of great players who according to everybody, actually aren't that good. He just happened to be in the right place at the right time as the players developed into golden boot winners, and into Australian, NZ, Samoan, Tigers and Canterbury captains.

The only thing we have is dull old Ivan, four trophies, a win in every grade in the same year that has never been accomplished before, ever, full stop.

All we have are his buzz words "culture, buy in, consistency". Lightweight.

The only sad thing is, imagine what Ivan could achieve if he was actually a good coach.....
 
Messages
4,527
You have got to feel sorry for coaches, as age.s put it, team good, its the players, team bad, its the coach. To be called just above average when you have taken two different teams to a total of six GF's and won four in a row, is an incredible insult.

You may call them "buzz words" but consistency, culture and buy in are exactly the values that elite organisations the world over believe in and practice. Easy to say and hard to do. It means taking hard steps like getting rid of top performing players that just don't have the right values. RCG was moved on for precisely those reasons. Blake the same. RCG was a representative level prop, he has gone on to play in a grand final for the Eels, yet out he went.

Read some of the excellent books by ex GE CEO Jack Welch (Jack:Straight from the Guts for example). He said the hardest thing was getting rid of the good performers who just didn't buy in to what they were trying to do and subtly undermined the team ethos. He built an organisation that delivered 15% growth for ten years, an almost unheard of growth when you consider the industries they were in.

Read about how the SAS select recruits and the Navy Seals. Values are everything, talent is a bonus. You may be the fittest and best soldier in the world, but if you are a selfish prick, you will not pass selection, simple as.

Last year the Panthers let Taylan May leave, not because he was a bad player, in fact who much would we like to have him now, but his behaviour didn't fit with the values the team live by.

Contrast this with the Broncos. Ezra Mam injures a family driving under the influence of drugs and just for good measure, he didn't have a licence. He will play this weekend after a paltry nine week suspension. Is he a good team player? Would you trust him to do the right thing when times are tough? Maybe Madge can straighten him out, but the example he has set doesn't bode well for their team.

There may have been some great talent that came through at the Panthers, but they didn't arrive as the finished article. Who coached them? Were they going to be champions anyway, Cleary had no influence?

If you look at the star teams of the past, most commentators say the Broncos and the Raiders teams were better than the four-peat Panthers. Where is our shining star? Our Renouf, our Daley, Webke, Hancock, Meninga, Stuart, where are the superstars? According to everybody most of our players would be lucky to be on the bench of these great teams. We aren't flash and exciting to watch. No Mullins or Renouf flashes of brilliance, no barnstorming Meninga runs finished off by the slashing speed of Daley. Nobody tough like Webke or Lazarus. As the great English football song goes 'we are shit and we know we are".

We have nothing. A slightly above average coach who inherited a bunch of great players who according to everybody, actually aren't that good. He just happened to be in the right place at the right time as the players developed into golden boot winners, and into Australian, NZ, Samoan, Tigers and Canterbury captains.

The only thing we have is dull old Ivan, four trophies, a win in every grade in the same year that has never been accomplished before, ever, full stop.

All we have are his buzz words "culture, buy in, consistency". Lightweight.

The only sad thing is, imagine what Ivan could achieve if he was actually a good coach.....
Love the Seals reference. Reminds me of this Simon Sinek talk that I find pretty inspirational.


It is an interesting point that there are no stats to measure heart.
 

Chins

Juniors
Messages
1,128
You have got to feel sorry for coaches, as age.s put it, team good, its the players, team bad, its the coach. To be called just above average when you have taken two different teams to a total of six GF's and won four in a row, is an incredible insult.

You may call them "buzz words" but consistency, culture and buy in are exactly the values that elite organisations the world over believe in and practice. Easy to say and hard to do. It means taking hard steps like getting rid of top performing players that just don't have the right values. RCG was moved on for precisely those reasons. Blake the same. RCG was a representative level prop, he has gone on to play in a grand final for the Eels, yet out he went.

Read some of the excellent books by ex GE CEO Jack Welch (Jack:Straight from the Guts for example). He said the hardest thing was getting rid of the good performers who just didn't buy in to what they were trying to do and subtly undermined the team ethos. He built an organisation that delivered 15% growth for ten years, an almost unheard of growth when you consider the industries they were in.

Read about how the SAS select recruits and the Navy Seals. Values are everything, talent is a bonus. You may be the fittest and best soldier in the world, but if you are a selfish prick, you will not pass selection, simple as.

Last year the Panthers let Taylan May leave, not because he was a bad player, in fact who much would we like to have him now, but his behaviour didn't fit with the values the team live by.

Contrast this with the Broncos. Ezra Mam injures a family driving under the influence of drugs and just for good measure, he didn't have a licence. He will play this weekend after a paltry nine week suspension. Is he a good team player? Would you trust him to do the right thing when times are tough? Maybe Madge can straighten him out, but the example he has set doesn't bode well for their team.

There may have been some great talent that came through at the Panthers, but they didn't arrive as the finished article. Who coached them? Were they going to be champions anyway, Cleary had no influence?

If you look at the star teams of the past, most commentators say the Broncos and the Raiders teams were better than the four-peat Panthers. Where is our shining star? Our Renouf, our Daley, Webke, Hancock, Meninga, Stuart, where are the superstars? According to everybody most of our players would be lucky to be on the bench of these great teams. We aren't flash and exciting to watch. No Mullins or Renouf flashes of brilliance, no barnstorming Meninga runs finished off by the slashing speed of Daley. Nobody tough like Webke or Lazarus. As the great English football song goes 'we are shit and we know we are".

We have nothing. A slightly above average coach who inherited a bunch of great players who according to everybody, actually aren't that good. He just happened to be in the right place at the right time as the players developed into golden boot winners, and into Australian, NZ, Samoan, Tigers and Canterbury captains.

The only thing we have is dull old Ivan, four trophies, a win in every grade in the same year that has never been accomplished before, ever, full stop.

All we have are his buzz words "culture, buy in, consistency". Lightweight.

The only sad thing is, imagine what Ivan could achieve if he was actually a good coach.....
May got at least 5 more chances than he should have
 

age.s

First Grade
Messages
8,196
The other thing I'd point out was that none of our "superstars" were hyped as particularly good players prior to 2019.

Nath: Young player with potential. Go look at the Cleary vs Ponga thread created around then and consider the trajectory of both players from that time.
Yeo: We rated him. Almost no one else did, to the point that other teams fans used him as the example of Panthers fans habitually overrating their players.
Luai, Crichton, Too, Edwards: Talented rookies who's career could have gone in any direction. Luai had a bit of hype, but the others were relatively unknown toiling in cup. Edwards in particular barely looked first grade standard at times.
Fish/Moses: Young props. Consensus was they had a long way to go.
Kikau: Probably the only player people genuinely rated.
Api: Probably the most stark example. Literally paid by Manly to be here after being punted for an admittedly talented rookie. Was largely seen as a solid, middle of the pack hooker. Became one of if not the best hooker in the sport.
Martin: I think most probably saw the player there tbh. Still, he was only a rookie when Ivan came in.
Sorensen: Bog standard first grader. Plenty of others in this bracket came in and did a great job for us during this time.

The point is, we didn't do the 2025 equivalent of recruiting Haas, Hughes and Ponga. We took a bunch of kids and other teams cast offs and built one the greatest dynasties that has ever existed in modern professional sport. Seriously think about that. Ivan (and his staff tbf) either taught these kids how to be superstars or brought established players up to a level they weren't even close to approaching. I get that his use of the bench give many of us anxiety, there has to be some acknowledgement of the unbelievable achievement that represents.
 
Top