Bulldogs Lack of Sportmanship

[bulldog]

who cares, who dosent like biff?

I agree, a bit of spite can make a match. If it wasn't the doggies involved it would have just been labelled a "fiery encounter".

 

[melon....]

who cares, who dosent like biff?

I agree, a bit of spite can make a match. If it wasn't the doggies involved it would have just been labelled a "fiery encounter".

No...if the Filthy Dogs didnt carry on like Pork Chops, then it would have been a fiery encouter.

 

[RB30DETT]

Kindest sir,

Leeds played a trial game against London Broncos, that is when McGuire got injured

You said that it was their first game, when you know full well it wasnt.

If you opened your eyes, you would see I said the Leeds Club including the academy.


Thats the end of todays lesson, your dismissed.

leeds had a training session with lb.
you never said including academy and if i'd not pointed it out you'd have had everyone believe our full team was out every week for 5 weeks training their balls off playing super league opposition ready for the game when it clearly wasn't the case.

and if we're giving out lessons here's one for you...

it's "you're dismissed" not "your dismissed"
(dismissed doesn't belong to me)

basic english

I hate to be a pain, but here is where I mentioned the academy

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/v...amp;postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=40

3rd last post on the page, and as you can see there is no edit.

Thank you.

 

[RB30DETT]

http://www.yorkshire-evening-post.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=46&ArticleID=928301


Just a training session was it??? #-o

 

[Bulldog-Power]

"but tonight is their final full-scale trial game"

kind of implies they have had more then one "full scale" trial game

dopey poms

 

[Kiwi]

"but tonight is their final full-scale trial game"

kind of implies they have had more then one "full scale" trial game

dopey poms

And the dogs didn't have any......

Dopey Dogs

 

[Bulldog-Power]

*shrugs*

better not to risk injury, allready had a host of stars out

back 2 back for 2005 is more important

 

[Kiwi]

*shrugs*

better not to risk injury, allready had a host of stars out

back 2 back for 2005 is more important

Then why worry about what trials Leeds had?

If it wasn't important, why did the dogs go? Why did Folkes look unhappy when they were losing at half time? Why did Folkes look like he was getting excited by the come back? All this talk about not taking the game seriously ect seemed to me more like the Dogs were making escuses before they lost.

 

[ouwet]

*shrugs*

better not to risk injury, allready had a host of stars out

back 2 back for 2005 is more important

Then why worry about what trials Leeds had?

If it wasn't important, why did the dogs go? Why did Folkes look unhappy when they were losing at half time? Why did Folkes look like he was getting excited by the come back? All this talk about not taking the game seriously ect seemed to me more like the Dogs were making escuses before they lost.

Considering Super League starts this weekend leeds HAD TO HAVE TRIALS... When the WCC was played the NRL was 5 weeks away!

 

[Kiwi]

*shrugs*

better not to risk injury, allready had a host of stars out

back 2 back for 2005 is more important

Then why worry about what trials Leeds had?

If it wasn't important, why did the dogs go? Why did Folkes look unhappy when they were losing at half time? Why did Folkes look like he was getting excited by the come back? All this talk about not taking the game seriously ect seemed to me more like the Dogs were making escuses before they lost.

Considering Super League starts this weekend leeds HAD TO HAVE TRIALS... When the WCC was played the NRL was 5 weeks away!

Well what was stopping the Dogs from playing a trial game against a ESL team before hand? Nothing was, they just didn't want to. So the fact that Leeds had trials is a non-issue in terms of it giving them an adavtage. The dogs had every chance to play a warm up game or two before hand, but chose not to.

 

[melon....]

The Dogs are a sham....this time its because they didnt take it seriously...no hang on they did...no hang on...Leeds trialled...no hang on the Dogs could have but didnt...no hang on....they didnt because they didnt care....

all the Dogs had to do was what Easts did...have a couple of hitouts and smash Leeds. But the Dogs mentally knew they couldnt win without Mason, Omeley, Sherwin, Utai...so what did they do? What all good spineless cowards do...give up and not bother.

 

[Zef]

So much f***in' ado about so much f***in' nothing. The game's over, we gave it a shot, we lost, stiff sh.t.

We get over losing an NRL game just as quickly - believe it or not, stuff like that happens in Rugby League.

You win some, you lose some.

And then you quit with the f***in' whinging.

 

[Surfer Joe]

Agree fully Zef,this one has been done to death.

 

[Timmah]

...so what did they do? What all good spineless cowards do...give up and not bother.

Yeah, coming back from 38-12 down to only lose by 7 is so cowardly, they fully gave up didn't they.

You f**king fool. Piss off.

 

[RB30DETT]

The Dogs are a sham....this time its because they didnt take it seriously...no hang on they did...no hang on...Leeds trialled...no hang on the Dogs could have but didnt...no hang on....they didnt because they didnt care....

all the Dogs had to do was what Easts did...have a couple of hitouts and smash Leeds. But the Dogs mentally knew they couldnt win without Mason, Omeley, Sherwin, Utai...so what did they do? What all good spineless cowards do...give up and not bother.

Just like the Roosters in the 2nd half of the Grandfinal.