BullShit Referees

[leoc]

Someone explain how the hell that is a try??
Was it obstruction or not??
WTF!!

 

[madunit]

Because if Moltzen had've bothered to continue trying to stop the try he would've got there in time.

Instead he gave up, crying to the ref and didn't play the whistle.

 

[37916319]

Because if Moltzen had've bothered to continue trying to stop the try he would've got there in time.

Instead he gave up, crying to the ref and didn't play the whistle.

+1.

Had he tried making a tackle and fell short it may well have not been given but you can't credit laziness.

 

[leoc]

I saw that happen in origin and because the effort was made they didn't give the penalty. Not that I am saying that he should have stopped but......

 

[leoc]

Can they clear this stupid rule up, just making life hell for everyone

 

[Old Time Tiger]

Or if he was an intelligent footballer, he could have taken a subtle dive.

But there's the problem, he's not intelligent.

 

[madunit]

Smart teams exploit the rule. Dumb teams cry about it.

 

[leoc]

Come on guys,, if the rule is there and he was clearly pushed it was a penalty no questions asked and not a try. Just becoming frustrating when they are so freakin inconsistant.

 

[Tiger05]

Because if Moltzen had've bothered to continue trying to stop the try he would've got there in time.

Instead he gave up, crying to the ref and didn't play the whistle.

You are such a stupid tool.

 

[Tiger05]

Smart teams exploit the rule. Dumb teams cry about it.

Please stop posting and make a general apology. No one can be as stupid as you are.

 

[Tiger05]

Come on guys,, if the rule is there and he was clearly pushed it was a penalty no questions asked and not a try. Just becoming frustrating when they are so freakin inconsistant.

Yep.

 

[madunit]

Please stop posting and make a general apology. No one can be as stupid as you are.

Go f**k yourself.

First thing you're told as a player is to play to the whistle.

Moltzen didn't.

Because he made no attempt, the ref is unable to know how much the interference played a role. You keep trying,

Its f**king basic & obvious to anyone who has played the game. If you don't like my posts then f**k off, cos i ain't leaving.

 

[mems77]

Happy for the try to be rewarded. It's not god damn FIFA. Why on earth would you give up on the chase Moltzen? Throwing your hands in the air does not constitute a penalty. Along with ball hogging, terrible positioning, death glaring at team mates, woeful hands, no strength and what appears to be no will whatsoever does not make a fullback let alone a first grade footballer. Sheesh, put Utai at fullback. At least he will run it into defence.

 

[Tiger05]

Go f**k yourself.

First thing you're told as a player is to play to the whistle.

Moltzen didn't.

Because he made no attempt, the ref is unable to know how much the interference played a role. You keep trying,

Its f**king basic & obvious to anyone who has played the game. If you don't like my posts then f**k off, cos i ain't leaving.

You are such a f**king dickhead. Seriously grow a brain or a penis. If you had either you would man up and admit what a stupid moron you are.

The funny thing is that I bet you know that you are being a complete tool.

He was taken out of the play moron. Do you not have a brain ????

 

[madunit]

You don't know jack shit about me you idiot.

He was pushed, not taken out, he turned to the ref with his arms wide open complaining while play continued and he was standing all of a metre or two from where the try was scored.

Go and watch the replay.

Furthermore, since when does one need a penis to see the bleeding obvious. Are you sexist?

If I didn't have a brain I wouldn't be alive. Anyone with a brain knows that.

f**k you are dumb lol

 

[Tiger05]

f**k you are dumb lol

You must also talk to yourself. You are so f**ken stupid to make out that Moltzen wasn't taken out and could have made that play.

Seriously - just apologize and be done with it because you sound like such a stupid f**ken dickwad.

You are wrong and you have nothing.

 

[madunit]

I have plenty, go and watch the replay and see how close Moltzen was to where the try was scored and watch how long he stood complaining to the ref while play continued.

If he had've attempted to run at the play, he would have got closer.

He may not have prevented the try but he would've had a much stronger case for being taken out.

But because he failed to try the referee can in no way determine if Moltzen was prevented from saving the try.

Try and have a rational discussion isntead of carrying on like a f**king idiot.

 

[benched tiger]

Moltzen issue aside,Benji's defence was again shit house,both Kingston and Walsh ran passed him on his inside to the try line,for a NRL super star, it is f##king embarrassing watching his rookie like defensive lapses.

 

[Tiger05]

I have plenty, go and watch the replay and see how close Moltzen was to where the try was scored and watch how long he stood complaining to the ref while play continued.

If he had've attempted to run at the play, he would have got closer.

He may not have prevented the try but he would've had a much stronger case for being taken out.

But because he failed to try the referee can in no way determine if Moltzen was prevented from saving the try.

Try and have a rational discussion isntead of carrying on like a f**king idiot.

Seriously - you are just coming across as more and more stupid. Ever heard the phrase pot, kettle, black.

The effort for the bomb was poor but the tackle on Lewis was a try saver. He was taken out plain and simple for the other try.

Keep going on if you want too but you are wrong and simply being a f**ken tool

 

[T.T]

the problem is moltzen shouldnt have to make a 2nd attempt or take a dive.. he was clearly impeded and the penalty should be awarded straight away