It was the right decision for the wrong reasons.
Cayless as captain should have been sin binned because he was warned next penalty and because it was different players everytime it is the captain that goes.
But that would mean that Champion shouldn't have been the one binned.
That's almost logical ... the problem is the situation you're applying it to is farcial and completely defies commonsense..
It made no sense to bin Cayless. But based on that, it would have made more sense to bin Luke Stuart (I don't care if he was on the bench at the time ... he should have been made to pay dammit).
Then again Champion's tackle wasn't even high, so it shoudln't even have been a penalty.
So when Wesser caught Inu high ... Stuart should been binned at that point. Or better yet, Asotasi. Yeah.
:crazy::crazy::crazy:
It's like getting escaped mental patients to serve as court judges. It's worse than the Chewbacca Defence.
Edit - It should also be remembered that it's the refs who actually determine the penalty count. A lot of the penalties blown yesterday were nit-picky at best. The two ding-bat refs should have sin-binned each other!!!