Well said Reefy, agreed, PJ marsh should fight it, there was nothing in it and if barrett doesnt react to nothing, the incident is not cited.
It's bullsh*t favoritism, if that was crocker reacting to the innocuous charge down attempt, or Morely or Stevens, PJ marsh does not get cited. I read a ridiculous quote from one of the papers today that said " the judiciary understands that the way players react is usually a pretty good guide as to the fact that someone had crossed the line" and they cite PJ marsh on that basis !? it's stupid.
I wish they looked at that "how players react" bulsh*t when Beats knocked that dragin scum on his ass at the SFS a few years back. He copped one through the legs of the marker by Battrim I think it was , Beats stands up and sends the wrong bloke to disneyland .
It's bullsh*t favoritism, if that was crocker reacting to the innocuous charge down attempt, or Morely or Stevens, PJ marsh does not get cited. I read a ridiculous quote from one of the papers today that said " the judiciary understands that the way players react is usually a pretty good guide as to the fact that someone had crossed the line" and they cite PJ marsh on that basis !? it's stupid.
I wish they looked at that "how players react" bulsh*t when Beats knocked that dragin scum on his ass at the SFS a few years back. He copped one through the legs of the marker by Battrim I think it was , Beats stands up and sends the wrong bloke to disneyland .