What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Cheating Magpie Filth

meltiger

First Grade
Messages
6,268
If anyone wonders why I am so dead against Channel 9 retaining the FTA rights beyond the current contract ...

Originally posted on Real Footy.com -

Pies' $6m bid for Brown riles Lions

By Caroline Wilson
May 6, 2005

The Brisbane Lions will ask the AFL to review its rules regarding off-field payments to players following the revelation that Collingwood guaranteed Jonathan Brown $6 million over five years.

The Lions, still seething at the Magpies' multimillion-dollar attempt to entice their star player to Melbourne through media inducements, believe non-Victorian clubs risk losing champions through big-money offers linked to broadcasting outlets such as Channel Nine.

On Tuesday, Brown committed himself to Brisbane until 2008 following revelations in The Age that Magpies president Eddie McGuire and chief executive Greg Swann had flown to Sydney last Friday in a last-ditch attempt to woo him.

After the 23-year-old centre half-forward, who enthralled the competition with his stunning eight-goal return against Essendon, and his advisory team agreed to an in-principle deal with the Lions this week, the club was told that the Collingwood offer involved $700,000 a year until 2010, along with the promise of $500,000 a year in off-field money - largely from television performances.

Brown has instead accepted a three-year deal with Brisbane, estimated at a total $1.9 million.

advertisement

advertisement

Sydney chairman Graeme Downie said last night: "My problem with the AFL is that it allows clubs to approach players while they are still contracted to other clubs. I'm not saying Collingwood broke the rules, I'm saying I don't like the rules."

AFL chief executive Andrew Demetriou said he was unaware of the details of the Collingwood offer, adding he had not yet received any official complaint from Brisbane. Said Collingwood CEO Swann: "We do not comment on contracts regarding any players, be it our own or other clubs."

While Brisbane had spoken to Brown of the emotional and financial significance of remaining a one-club player, McGuire and Swann attempted to persuade Brown's adviser Glen Warry of the post-football opportunities on offer in Melbourne, not to mention those involving such a popular club as the Magpies. Warry is understood to have told Brisbane of the Collingwood offer late on Monday.

What has reportedly fuelled the Lions' anger at Collingwood has been the AFL's recent refusal to allow Brown a $20,000 endorsement deal with a sporting apparel firm.

The Lions believe that Collingwood, which for several years has led the charge against Brisbane's extra salary cap allowance, now boasts even more scope to pay big money to footballers through its Channel Nine connection.

The Magpies have also reportedly approached soon to be out-of-contract Saint Nick Dal Santo.

This is utterly disgusting but not really suprising given the filth of a club we are talking about.

Channel 9 needs to realise that there are 16 teams in the League not 1. If Channel 9 retain the rights, McGuire must be forced to resign his position as Collingwood President.
 

CyberKev

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
2,323
meltiger said:
Channel 9 needs to realise that there are 16 teams in the League not 1. If Channel 9 retain the rights, McGuire must be forced to resign his position as Collingwood President.

I'm not arguing that McGuire isn't committing a major conflict of interest in his dual roles (this has been the case for years), but -- given that he's a full-on Magpie tragic -- wouldn't he still be initiating these sorts of things even if he wasn't President?

Another reason why it'll be good for 9 to lose the AFL rights.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,751
he isn't doing them much good atm, looking at their position on the ladder, but thats not to say that his influence wont change that in the future

Eddie, or Nein should be booted before things get worse
 

Latest posts

Top