If it's already been mentioned, I apologise, but put this in perspective a little...
We're talking about a stadium which has to compete with Aussie and Telstra for tennants here. The fans and players will not put up with a sub-par stadium, even if it is their 'home' ground, if there is a far superior stadium within spitting distance.
That means that this project would probably be on a par with Skilled Park or the new Melbourne Stadium, which cost (respectively) $160 million and $268 million.
Can anyone see big Russ or Tony forking out that kind of cash - because with a surplus of venues as is, its hard to see the government kicking in any money at all towards the stadium - Clover More has said as much, noting that one of the principal things she'd be concerned about would be proximity to other venues.
Remember, even if Big Russ does somehow cough up a quater of a billion dollars for this stadium, the taxpayer still has to foot the bill for things like urban development around the stadium, encompassing things like car parking, rail links, etc, which would run to the tens of millions. This would make development permission difficult to obtain at best.
This is - quite obviously I believe - the two of them sabre-rattling at the SCG trust in order to get a better contract to play at Aussie Stadium next time around.
Besides, at the end of the day, Russ and Tony have both stated before that they believe their respective clubs will be able to average 30k+ to home fixtures in the not to distant future (what's kinda funny is they both seem like they believe what they're saying when they say that). So if they think they can average 30k to a game, why on earth would they fork out massive chunks of their own personal wealth to build a stadium which is too small for what they want?