Did anyone else notice - was that legal?

[beekershark]

100% agree on all those points, with the possible exception of the galloway one.

Peachey was tackled effectively, eventhough its one on one, you cannot strip the ball after the tackle is made. As SS correctly states, had peachey got to his feet and took off, the stadium would have rocked with booes and a penalty given for leaving the mark. Yet the ball is stripped at the same time, nothing said.....

ON the Mini tackle, that too was a joke. He was quite willing and prepared to get to his feet and try and get out of the in goal, so why on earth is our second player not aloud to run in and stop him ?

 

[tUp]

Vanganas loooooong break down the sideline, then they sat on merrit for half an hour.

 

[millersnose]

after watching the replay - and i will admit i thought the ball was unfairly stripped when i seen it originally - peachey was on the ground with no rooster hand on him

the rooster player popped it out of his hand - perhaps legally - as he wasnt technically tackled and the rooster player played for the ball

all siad and done though we got a break in the second half when peachey knoked the ball out of rooster wingers hand when they were in a scoring position

should have been knock on against the sharks but we got a scrum feed

i thought the ref went ok overall

 

[Macca]

Mander was good. I love hearing "no earlies!"

 

[imasharkie]

and the crowd endearing wooohooo at kick off.