Do you want Brad Arthur as coach

[Avenger]

If we go 0 and 5 with some floggings. It’s happened many times with our club after tight losses, we go into the Tigers game with the coach’s career on the line?

 

[Gary Gutful]

It was on the line the moment we lost the GF.

 

[Chipmunk]

Surely from where we were when he signed his last contract, the club had a KPI around if we didnt make the Top 8 at any stage, then they could simply terminate the contract.

 

[the phantom menace]

Surely from where we were when he signed his last contract, the club had a KPI around if we didnt make the Top 8 at any stage, then they could simply terminate the contract.

I'd give a from Round 10 onwards clause, just so a round 1 loss etc doesn't trigger it. But I'd also have had a final 4 clause too.

 

[Chipmunk]

I'd give a from Round 10 onwards clause, just so a round 1 loss etc doesn't trigger it. But I'd also have had a final 4 clause too.

I actually meant at the end of the season. To be honest the Top 8 only means something after the final round, before that it isn't relevant.

You can't punt a coach because the team isn't in the Top 8 mid season, if he has a KPI to make the Top 8.

 

[the phantom menace]

I was thinking be in the final 4 at the end, and from round 10 onwards be in and stay in the top 8... he met the threshhold last year, and he's got two months to fix how we've started to meet that threshhold for this year. And if not, if that KPI was in his contract I'd punt him in Round 11.

 

[Chipmunk]

I was thinking be in the final 4 at the end, and from round 10 onwards be in and stay in the top 8... he met the threshhold last year, and he's got two months to fix how we've started to meet that threshhold for this year. And if not, if that KPI was in his contract I'd punt him in Round 11.

I'd say that would be a difficult contract to implement. I suspect "Top 8" clauses could only be enacted come seasons end.

At the end of the day if you're running last after Round 10, but still make the Top 4 at seasons end, is there really any difference in the end result?

 

[Poupou Escobar]

I'd say that would be a difficult contract to implement. I suspect "Top 8" clauses could only be enacted come seasons end.

At the end of the day if you're running last after Round 10, but still make the Top 4 at seasons end, is there really any difference in the end result?

Merkins thought Daniel Anderson was a genius for it.

 

[Avenger]

Merkins thought Daniel Anderson was a genius for it.

He squeezed into the 8 in 2009. Enought with the misleading stats. And yes, Ando was a great coach. That Pirtek f**kwit CEO insisted on Kearney when he should have declared a conflict of interest with his sponsorship with Parramatta and the NZ national team. How he was allowed to influence the board way back then was f**king corrupt.

 

[hineyrulz]

Anderson was a deadset genius compared Bald Arthur.

 

[yy_cheng]

Ba should be our father coach. Make the players feel happy and like a son to the club but not the head coach.

If ba did get the sack, does Barrett automatically come in as caretaker?

 

[Chipmunk]

I asked ChatGPT view of BA.

"Ah, Brad Arthur, the coach of the Parramatta Eels. What can I say about him? Well, for starters, he's certainly not the most inspiring figure in the NRL coaching ranks.

I mean, let's face it, he's about as exciting as a wet sock. His press conferences are about as interesting as watching paint dry. And his game plans are about as creative as a stale sandwich.

But it's not just his lack of charisma that's the problem. It's his coaching ability, or lack thereof. For a coach who's been at the helm for so long, he's had plenty of time to lead the Eels to glory, but they continue to fall short.

He seems to be stuck in his ways, unable or unwilling to adapt to changing circumstances. His game plans are predictable and easy to read, and he's often slow to make changes when things aren't working.

And let's not forget about his recruitment. The Eels have made some questionable signings under his watch, and some of his decisions have left fans scratching their heads.

But perhaps the most frustrating thing about Brad Arthur is his inability to get the best out of his players. He's had some talented rosters to work with over the years, but he's often failed to extract the full potential from them.

His team often lacks passion and intensity, and they seem to crumble under pressure. He's also struggled to develop young talent, which is crucial in a salary-capped league like the NRL.

In conclusion, Brad Arthur is a coach who's long past his expiration date. He's boring, uninspiring, and has failed to lead the Eels to success. He's stuck in his ways, makes questionable decisions, and struggles to get the best out of his players. The sooner the Eels move on from him, the better."

 

[Grapple]

AI falls short because it can't recognise baldness in coaches. Still got a long way to go.

 

[strider]

I asked ChatGPT view of BA.

"Ah, Brad Arthur, the coach of the Parramatta Eels. What can I say about him? Well, for starters, he's certainly not the most inspiring figure in the NRL coaching ranks.

I mean, let's face it, he's about as exciting as a wet sock. His press conferences are about as interesting as watching paint dry. And his game plans are about as creative as a stale sandwich.

But it's not just his lack of charisma that's the problem. It's his coaching ability, or lack thereof. For a coach who's been at the helm for so long, he's had plenty of time to lead the Eels to glory, but they continue to fall short.

He seems to be stuck in his ways, unable or unwilling to adapt to changing circumstances. His game plans are predictable and easy to read, and he's often slow to make changes when things aren't working.

And let's not forget about his recruitment. The Eels have made some questionable signings under his watch, and some of his decisions have left fans scratching their heads.

But perhaps the most frustrating thing about Brad Arthur is his inability to get the best out of his players. He's had some talented rosters to work with over the years, but he's often failed to extract the full potential from them.

His team often lacks passion and intensity, and they seem to crumble under pressure. He's also struggled to develop young talent, which is crucial in a salary-capped league like the NRL.

In conclusion, Brad Arthur is a coach who's long past his expiration date. He's boring, uninspiring, and has failed to lead the Eels to success. He's stuck in his ways, makes questionable decisions, and struggles to get the best out of his players. The sooner the Eels move on from him, the better."

Dude thats not chat GPT. You've accidently SMSed Avenger on a bad day

 

[Poupou Escobar]

He squeezed into the 8 in 2009. Enought with the misleading stats. And yes, Ando was a great coach. That Pirtek f**kwit CEO insisted on Kearney when he should have declared a conflict of interest with his sponsorship with Parramatta and the NZ national team. How he was allowed to influence the board way back then was f**king corrupt.

If Anderson was a great coach he would’ve had an NRL career after Parramatta.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

I asked ChatGPT view of BA.

"Ah, Brad Arthur, the coach of the Parramatta Eels. What can I say about him? Well, for starters, he's certainly not the most inspiring figure in the NRL coaching ranks.

I mean, let's face it, he's about as exciting as a wet sock. His press conferences are about as interesting as watching paint dry. And his game plans are about as creative as a stale sandwich.

But it's not just his lack of charisma that's the problem. It's his coaching ability, or lack thereof. For a coach who's been at the helm for so long, he's had plenty of time to lead the Eels to glory, but they continue to fall short.

He seems to be stuck in his ways, unable or unwilling to adapt to changing circumstances. His game plans are predictable and easy to read, and he's often slow to make changes when things aren't working.

And let's not forget about his recruitment. The Eels have made some questionable signings under his watch, and some of his decisions have left fans scratching their heads.

But perhaps the most frustrating thing about Brad Arthur is his inability to get the best out of his players. He's had some talented rosters to work with over the years, but he's often failed to extract the full potential from them.

His team often lacks passion and intensity, and they seem to crumble under pressure. He's also struggled to develop young talent, which is crucial in a salary-capped league like the NRL.

In conclusion, Brad Arthur is a coach who's long past his expiration date. He's boring, uninspiring, and has failed to lead the Eels to success. He's stuck in his ways, makes questionable decisions, and struggles to get the best out of his players. The sooner the Eels move on from him, the better."

Looks like it got its training data from social media.

 

[Gazzamatta]

I was thinking be in the final 4 at the end, and from round 10 onwards be in and stay in the top 8... he met the threshhold last year, and he's got two months to fix how we've started to meet that threshhold for this year. And if not, if that KPI was in his contract I'd punt him in Round 11.

Id like a kpi that opposition teams average less that 18 points per game against us. Last year it was just over 20 after 25 rounds, this year so far its 23.
Something has to be done about our continuing poor D.

 

[Hindmarshisgod2]

Nrl says we need more fatigue in games, bushy says hold my beer

 

[Gary Gutful]

Nrl says we need more fatigue in games, bushy says hold my beer

*water

 

[Avenger]

If Anderson was a great coach he would’ve had an NRL career after Parramatta.

The same logic could be used for Shane Flanagan. Nothing about be a great coach, it could be something more personal.