Never ask the question when you don't really want to hear the answer :lol:effnic said:Dammit.
I'm hoping to see them next weekeffnic said:Im hoping to see a few "Storm chokers of the nrl" after the gf if we make it, there the only choke threads i wanna see.
Hope is good effie...... at least for one more week anyway :lol:effnic said:Lol true dat. Oh Man v Eels gf what a dream come true if it were to happen.
parramaniac2516 said:According to some stats i got since 01 the Dogs have won 5 matches and lost 8 in the finals.
Now three of those wins came in the premiership year of 04. So if you exclude that one good year the wins and the loses. The dogs have a history of losing a lot of matches in the finals.
Won 2 and lost 7.
Maybe they loved september in the 90's but not since the new millenium.
mattyg said:how was that a choke??
we had our best player off the field, and we fought till the end.
yes, the dogs of war thing is a myth, hopefully the media get over it. Its been a myth since the 90s
Mr Saab said:Thankyou Parramatta for putting the puppies to the sword and ending this so called reign as the "Dogs of War" and "No one wants to play the Dogs come September"
Parramatta = Myth Busters
Sea_Eagles_Rock said:How Sherwin has a premiership ring is seriously beyond me...
innsaneink said:Seems people dunno what choke ''means''
You need to be a red hot favourite, you need to be winning everything and anything.
Dogs were neither, winning two of their last seven games.....if anything they were ''consistent''...not chokers.
ShineDog said:So if the the Eels lose next week ...is that classed as a choke...f**k no!
If the Eels lead 30 to nil with 14 mins to go , and lose ...now that's a choke.
effnic said:Dogs didnt choke they were sh*t all year so a loss was expected.