I don’t base my opinion on 2 games we were very lucky to win against weak opposition.During the duration of his tenure with us he has been substd.Even if he was consistently playing well enough to offer him 400k+ u wouldn’t coz of his destabilising saboteur manager.Fact is he is leaving regardless of offer by us coz The grub moses will be leveraging our offer to get maximum elsewhere.At the end of the day what over-rides a players form or ability in negotiations is how could anyone think it’s wise after what the grub has done to this club to continue employing players managed by him.
Btw I must specify that I’d only consider offering him a max of 400k if he was managed by a human & not the grub.
No one is basing it on 2 games, he's played over 100 games and in many positions, he ain't a rookie, so his versatility factor is a premium.
TBH, 3 ball playing guys on the team, sounds pretty good.
But more importantly, we cannot go into a season without a recognised GK, that is suicide.
Api can kick, but what happens when he's not on the field?
As for Moses, agree it was a crazy decision by him, but if he signs, then I think he's professional enough to just play the game, and not get into the theatrics like Galvin did.
If we were lucky to win those two games, we would have lost them, if he wasn't playing.
Give him a decent offer (a hundred grand or so, is chickweed in the NRL these days), if he goes well there isn't much we can do, but go to market and find a GK urgently.