hineyrulz
Post Whore
- Messages
- 153,495
And Manningly shave those side burns.Hopefully he had a haircut in the off season.
And Manningly shave those side burns.Hopefully he had a haircut in the off season.
The rat s.seward is coming up on Ch 9 news revealing what went on behind the scenes..
Well tell us ffsThe rat s.seward is coming up on Ch 9 news revealing what went on behind the scenes..
What did he have to say Butch..Don't get NSW news down here in Thurgoona,,
He more or less said he done what he done to keep his job.
And since he left the eels no one from the nrl has supported him.
Just another bullshit whinging interview.
To be fair to Seward he probably did inherit a "shit sandwich" and did his best to fix the issue. It's not like the fraud he committed was to fix contracts he negotiated!! Or he pocketed from it!! And it's not like the board was on top of things either !!
He was probably the unlucky last man standing !!
Never seems to be mentioned that he instigated the Foran contract debacle on his own and offered Hoppa an inflated contract off his own bat
F*ck me, how dumb are you needing to ask that question? None you f*cking moronAnd what laws did he break doing that?
F*ck me, how dumb are you needing to ask that question? None you f*cking moron
So, why was it relevant to the discussion on hand, which is to do with the illegal misdemeanors of Mr Seward?
It highlights his incompetency. And an incompetent person is more likely to commit the alleged crimeSo, why was it relevant to the discussion on hand, which is to do with the illegal misdemeanors of Mr Seward?
And what laws did he break doing that?
The existing problems were players expecting money that was promised to them outside the cap. Paying overs to key players isn’t the same thing - most clubs have to do it.No but he makes out that he had to fix existing problems.
Then goes and makes some for himself
Then cries that he has been let down but he was only making the problems worse
The existing problems were players expecting money that was promised to them outside the cap. Paying overs to key players isn’t the same thing - most clubs have to do it.
Then why didn’t you say it was irrelevant to the conversation in your opinion rather than asking a question like a pretentious prick?So, why was it relevant to the discussion on hand, which is to do with the illegal misdemeanors of Mr Seward?