What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Eels in the media

Johnny88

Juniors
Messages
1,464

Inside Story: Jason Ryles explains how Dylan Brown became Parramatta’s $13m odd man out​

The Eels dropped a bombshell when they performed major spine surgery by moving star playmaker Dylan Brown to hooker. Here's the full story behind the change - and where it leaves Newcastle-bound Brown

A few weeks ago, as June 30 began to encroach on Parramatta and every other forward-thinking club in the NRL, Eels coach Jason Ryles sat down with departing Dylan Brown and spoke to him about the future.
The conversation was pretty simple. Brown wouldn’t be at the club next year and Ryles wanted to let him know that he wouldn’t stand in his way if he wanted to go to Newcastle this year. It was up to Brown.
It certainly wasn’t a personality problem, because Brown is one of the more likeable footballers in the NRL. What you see is what you get with Dylan.
He’s a laid-back dude who just so happened to be slapped on the butt by a rainbow when he was targeted by the Knights with a deal believed to be worth upwards of $13 million from next season.

Even Parramatta concede Brown would have been mad not to take it. Inevitably, once the deal was done and Brown’s future was sealed, talk around an early move was always going to ignite.
In the lead-up to June 30, it did just that as pieces began to be shuffled around the NRL. Whispers had been doing the rounds for weeks of a mega-swap involving the Knights, Eels and Tigers.
While Brown had agreed to join the Knights next season, Newcastle back rower Kai Pearce-Paul was on his way to the Wests Tigers and Tigers five-eighth Lachlan Galvin was edging towards the exit door as well.
The triple treat made sense, only Galvin looked to have scuppered the concept when he opted to join the Bulldogs rather than Parramatta.
It was briefly reignited again, albeit seemingly more in the mind of the media than the clubs involved, when Tallyn Da Silva became available.
The Tigers were still interested in getting their hands on Pearce-Paul ahead of schedule and the Knights were keen on Da Silva.
The stars seemed to align when Da Silva chose to join Parramatta but any hopes of late switcheroo quickly went by the wayside.
Pearce-Paul was happy to finish the season in Newcastle and good thing too given they have now lost Dylan Lucas, heaping more pressure on a club and coaching staff that are seemingly the subject of weekly rumours.
The latest suggested Newcastle coach Adam O’Brien could be gone as early as this week, although that has been denied by key figures at the Knights who insist it is business as usual.
The point being that every move at Newcastle right now is being viewed through the prism of a club and coach under pressure. Every loss edges them closer to the abyss.
Ryles is in the fortunate position to still control his own destiny and as such, he and the club can afford to tinker with things.
So Ryles sat down with Brown and laid it out. You can go, but if you choose to stay I can’t guarantee you will play in the halves.
The Eels needed to start planning for the future and sadly Brown wasn’t part of it. There was nothing malicious about the conversation. It was open and honest, which has been a hallmark of Ryles’ start to his career at the Eels.

You know where you stand. Ryles had a similar conversation with Clint Gutherson in the off-season over his move from fullback. Gutherson was given the same option. He chose to leave and joined St George Illawarra.
Brown went the other way. He told Ryles that he understood and would be happy to fit in with whatever the coach wanted. His preference was to finish the season with Parramatta and then move to Newcastle, even if he had no guarantee over where he would play.
So when he was moved to hooker at the weekend, it came as a surprise to many but not all. Crucially, the two figures at the centre of the shock shift - Ryles and Brown - knew exactly what was going on and were on board with it.
Brown didn’t throw his toys out of the cot. He didn’t kick up a stink.
“He’s across it all,” Ryle said.
“This is not a surprise to him. He’s a great kid.”


The challenge for Ryles now is to determine his next move. Ryley Smith is due back this week and the coaching staff have a huge opinion of Da Silva.
They both need to play so hooker seems out of the question for Brown. He could move back to five-eighth but the Eels are keen to work out whether they have a player in Joash Papalii and that means giving him game time in the halves.
Papalii is young and promising but behind him, the Eels have two of the best young playmakers in the game.
Lincoln Fletcher is a halfback who played Australian schoolboys last year and is signed through until the end of 2027.
Five-eighth Lorenzo Talataina was the SG Ball player of the year and playing alongside Fletcher as they led the side to the grand final, where they eventually lost to the Sydney Roosters in extra time.

Ryles won’t rush them, although his level of patience may be influenced by the performance of Papalii over the closing weeks of the season.
If Papalii can show he is up to it in coming weeks, the Eels can afford to take their time with their young players. If not, the level of urgency grows.
Regardless, Parramatta need to know what they have got. They could have maintained the status quo, maybe won a couple of extra games, but how would that have helped them heading into next season?
The finals are already out of reach and every game now is a chance to plan for 2026. The only way they can do that is by giving Papalii time in the No.6 jersey, which means Brown is the odd one out.
The good news is that he is OK with it. Ryles insists that Brown won’t kick stones and make life miserable for those around him.
“It’s pretty straight forward for me,” Ryles said.
“He made a decision that is best for him and we need to make one that is best for the club. That’s the reality of it.

 
Messages
18,391

Inside Story: Jason Ryles explains how Dylan Brown became Parramatta’s $13m odd man out​

The Eels dropped a bombshell when they performed major spine surgery by moving star playmaker Dylan Brown to hooker. Here's the full story behind the change - and where it leaves Newcastle-bound Brown

A few weeks ago, as June 30 began to encroach on Parramatta and every other forward-thinking club in the NRL, Eels coach Jason Ryles sat down with departing Dylan Brown and spoke to him about the future.
The conversation was pretty simple. Brown wouldn’t be at the club next year and Ryles wanted to let him know that he wouldn’t stand in his way if he wanted to go to Newcastle this year. It was up to Brown.
It certainly wasn’t a personality problem, because Brown is one of the more likeable footballers in the NRL. What you see is what you get with Dylan.
He’s a laid-back dude who just so happened to be slapped on the butt by a rainbow when he was targeted by the Knights with a deal believed to be worth upwards of $13 million from next season.

Even Parramatta concede Brown would have been mad not to take it. Inevitably, once the deal was done and Brown’s future was sealed, talk around an early move was always going to ignite.
In the lead-up to June 30, it did just that as pieces began to be shuffled around the NRL. Whispers had been doing the rounds for weeks of a mega-swap involving the Knights, Eels and Tigers.
While Brown had agreed to join the Knights next season, Newcastle back rower Kai Pearce-Paul was on his way to the Wests Tigers and Tigers five-eighth Lachlan Galvin was edging towards the exit door as well.
The triple treat made sense, only Galvin looked to have scuppered the concept when he opted to join the Bulldogs rather than Parramatta.
It was briefly reignited again, albeit seemingly more in the mind of the media than the clubs involved, when Tallyn Da Silva became available.
The Tigers were still interested in getting their hands on Pearce-Paul ahead of schedule and the Knights were keen on Da Silva.
The stars seemed to align when Da Silva chose to join Parramatta but any hopes of late switcheroo quickly went by the wayside.
Pearce-Paul was happy to finish the season in Newcastle and good thing too given they have now lost Dylan Lucas, heaping more pressure on a club and coaching staff that are seemingly the subject of weekly rumours.
The latest suggested Newcastle coach Adam O’Brien could be gone as early as this week, although that has been denied by key figures at the Knights who insist it is business as usual.
The point being that every move at Newcastle right now is being viewed through the prism of a club and coach under pressure. Every loss edges them closer to the abyss.
Ryles is in the fortunate position to still control his own destiny and as such, he and the club can afford to tinker with things.
So Ryles sat down with Brown and laid it out. You can go, but if you choose to stay I can’t guarantee you will play in the halves.
The Eels needed to start planning for the future and sadly Brown wasn’t part of it. There was nothing malicious about the conversation. It was open and honest, which has been a hallmark of Ryles’ start to his career at the Eels.

You know where you stand. Ryles had a similar conversation with Clint Gutherson in the off-season over his move from fullback. Gutherson was given the same option. He chose to leave and joined St George Illawarra.
Brown went the other way. He told Ryles that he understood and would be happy to fit in with whatever the coach wanted. His preference was to finish the season with Parramatta and then move to Newcastle, even if he had no guarantee over where he would play.
So when he was moved to hooker at the weekend, it came as a surprise to many but not all. Crucially, the two figures at the centre of the shock shift - Ryles and Brown - knew exactly what was going on and were on board with it.
Brown didn’t throw his toys out of the cot. He didn’t kick up a stink.
“He’s across it all,” Ryle said.
“This is not a surprise to him. He’s a great kid.”


The challenge for Ryles now is to determine his next move. Ryley Smith is due back this week and the coaching staff have a huge opinion of Da Silva.
They both need to play so hooker seems out of the question for Brown. He could move back to five-eighth but the Eels are keen to work out whether they have a player in Joash Papalii and that means giving him game time in the halves.
Papalii is young and promising but behind him, the Eels have two of the best young playmakers in the game.
Lincoln Fletcher is a halfback who played Australian schoolboys last year and is signed through until the end of 2027.
Five-eighth Lorenzo Talataina was the SG Ball player of the year and playing alongside Fletcher as they led the side to the grand final, where they eventually lost to the Sydney Roosters in extra time.

Ryles won’t rush them, although his level of patience may be influenced by the performance of Papalii over the closing weeks of the season.
If Papalii can show he is up to it in coming weeks, the Eels can afford to take their time with their young players. If not, the level of urgency grows.
Regardless, Parramatta need to know what they have got. They could have maintained the status quo, maybe won a couple of extra games, but how would that have helped them heading into next season?
The finals are already out of reach and every game now is a chance to plan for 2026. The only way they can do that is by giving Papalii time in the No.6 jersey, which means Brown is the odd one out.
The good news is that he is OK with it. Ryles insists that Brown won’t kick stones and make life miserable for those around him.
“It’s pretty straight forward for me,” Ryles said.
“He made a decision that is best for him and we need to make one that is best for the club. That’s the reality of it.


Really good article. Fans are behind it. The only idiots that don’t agree with it is that idiot from News.com and Andrew Voss.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
79,804
This report is Broncos centric, however we are shown in many of the stats. TBH they are not that bad in some areas.

Someone should do a TLDR executive summary.

 

Chipmunk

Coach
Messages
18,037
This report is Broncos centric, however we are shown in many of the stats. TBH they are not that bad in some areas.

Someone should do a TLDR executive summary.

Briefing Document: Brisbane Broncos' Performance in the 2025 NRL Season​

Source: Excerpts from "Madge’s second half of 2025 needs to improve the Broncos second halves - The Rugby League Eye Test"

Date of Source: July 14, 2025

Executive Summary​

The Brisbane Broncos, under coach Michael "Madge" Maguire, have shown significant improvement in the 2025 NRL season compared to their "disaster of a campaign in 2024". While their first-half performances are "largely excellent", the team consistently "flame out after the big break," struggling significantly in the second half of matches. This recurring issue, characterised by increased errors, poor ball control, and concession of set restarts, is hindering their potential for "meaningful September football" despite a strong overall record and improved discipline in other areas. The article suggests that addressing these second-half weaknesses is crucial for the Broncos to be genuine premiership contenders.

Key Themes and Facts​

1. Significant Improvement Under Michael Maguire​

  • Overall Performance: The Broncos' record has improved from 7-10 in 2024 (13th place, +9 point difference) to a "more respectable 10-7 record with a +80 difference" in 2025.
  • Home Record: Their home record at Suncorp has improved from 4-5 in 2024 to "a more Bronco like 6-2 record".
  • First Half Dominance: The team is "on average up by 5.06 points after 40 minutes, their best season since I’ve been tracking these numbers." They score "52% of their points in the first half" and concede only "41% of points in the first 40 minutes, which is coincidentally also fourth in the league."
  • Ball Carrier Control (First Half): Brisbane allows the "fewest offloads per set in the NRL for first halves this season at just 0.13 per set".
  • Repeat Set Conversion: Under Maguire, the Broncos are converting 18% of their repeat sets, up from a "worst repeat set conversion in the NRL" rate of 12.1% in 2024, now ranking "fifth best".
  • Territory: They are spending "more time in attacking areas – over 19% of play the balls are inside 20 metres, up from 15% last year." Conversely, only "59% of play the balls are in their own half, also down over 4%."
  • Metres Per Run Allowed: Their overall metres per run allowed is "the third lowest in the NRL at just 8.2 per carry," which is "the clubs lowest in a decade". This is attributed to a focus on "wrapping up ball carriers," leading to a significant drop in post-contact metres.
  • Influence of Adam Reynolds: Maguire has placed "more responsibility in Adam Reynolds this year," whose non-yardage usage rate ranks "third in the NRL". Reynolds has had four games above 40% usage this season, out of only 25 such games in the NRL.
  • Resilience Despite Injuries: The team has achieved this improvement "without key players as well with Reece Walsh, Ben Hunt and Ezra mam missing significant time, as well as a slew of injuries affecting their edge backrowers."

2. Pervasive Second Half Slump​

  • Average Margin Decline: While leading by an average of 5.06 points at half-time, their "final average margin after 80 minutes is just 4.82 meaning they’re losing their second halves by an average of 0.24 points per game."
  • Conceded Points: They "concede 59% of their points in the second half, which is the 4th worst rate in the NRL for second halves."
  • Critical Period: "Almost 20% of that 59% comes between the 51st and 59th minutes, the highest percentage during that time in the NRL."
  • Second Half Record: Brisbane's record in the "41st to 80th minutes" is a dismal "5-11-1 in second halves this season," compared to 10-6-1 in the first 40 minutes.
  • Offloads Allowed (Second Half): The Broncos' focus on stopping ball carriers "doesn’t last, as Brisbane’s number [offloads allowed per set] doubles in the second half to 0.26, placing them mid table."
  • Ball Control Issues:"55% of their total errors occur after half time, higher than the NRL average of 51%."
  • They are "16th at -14" in net errors for the second half, with "only the diabolical Newcastle Knights at -34 have less ball control for second periods in 2025."
  • This leads to the "biggest drop in complete sets by half in the NRL," going from 0.25 (one in four sets) to 0.32 (one in three sets) from first to second half.
  • Opponent Possession: These mistakes lead to "more opponent possession," with Brisbane "conceding more than 20 total sets to their opponents after half time," again "only trailing the Knights."
  • Set Restarts: While penalties are consistent across halves, the Broncos are "worst in the NRL" for net restarts conceded (-24 overall), with most "coming in the second half as mentioned – they are -8 in the first half but -16 in the second half."

3. Structural/Historical Weaknesses​

  • Back Three Contribution: The Broncos "routinely have the lowest contribution from their back three to the teams total run metres," generating "only 25% of their total run metres from their back three, the lowest share in the NRL." This is a "historic" issue independent of coaching.
  • Reliance on Forwards: The team heavily relies on key forwards like Payne Haas (11.1% of total yardage, 9th in NRL, only forward in top 20) and Pat Carrigan (over 10%) for yardage. This "dependence on forwards to create yardage" puts "even more pressure" on them if the back three have a bad yardage game.

Implications and Outlook​

  • Missed Opportunity: The second-half struggles "mask their flame outs in the second half though" and prevent them from capitalising on strong first-half performances.
  • Impact on Finals: This flaw must be overcome "to play meaningful September football." The author notes, "a low effort second half isn’t going to cut it against the Melbourne’s and Canberra’s of the competition."
  • Coach's Focus: Queensland coach Billy Slater "noticed earlier in the season" this second-half drop-off.
  • Potential for Premiership: If the club can "stay healthy and maintain a level of focus across 80 minutes, they may have a shot at winning one of the most wide open NRL premierships in history."
  • Areas for Improvement: The second-half issue "isn’t a serious issue for the club but should be a key focus, and most of it is coming from areas that can be worked at," particularly ball control, error rates, and conceding set restarts.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
79,804

Briefing Document: Brisbane Broncos' Performance in the 2025 NRL Season​

Source: Excerpts from "Madge’s second half of 2025 needs to improve the Broncos second halves - The Rugby League Eye Test"

Date of Source: July 14, 2025

Executive Summary​

The Brisbane Broncos, under coach Michael "Madge" Maguire, have shown significant improvement in the 2025 NRL season compared to their "disaster of a campaign in 2024". While their first-half performances are "largely excellent", the team consistently "flame out after the big break," struggling significantly in the second half of matches. This recurring issue, characterised by increased errors, poor ball control, and concession of set restarts, is hindering their potential for "meaningful September football" despite a strong overall record and improved discipline in other areas. The article suggests that addressing these second-half weaknesses is crucial for the Broncos to be genuine premiership contenders.

Key Themes and Facts​

1. Significant Improvement Under Michael Maguire​

  • Overall Performance: The Broncos' record has improved from 7-10 in 2024 (13th place, +9 point difference) to a "more respectable 10-7 record with a +80 difference" in 2025.
  • Home Record: Their home record at Suncorp has improved from 4-5 in 2024 to "a more Bronco like 6-2 record".
  • First Half Dominance: The team is "on average up by 5.06 points after 40 minutes, their best season since I’ve been tracking these numbers." They score "52% of their points in the first half" and concede only "41% of points in the first 40 minutes, which is coincidentally also fourth in the league."
  • Ball Carrier Control (First Half): Brisbane allows the "fewest offloads per set in the NRL for first halves this season at just 0.13 per set".
  • Repeat Set Conversion: Under Maguire, the Broncos are converting 18% of their repeat sets, up from a "worst repeat set conversion in the NRL" rate of 12.1% in 2024, now ranking "fifth best".
  • Territory: They are spending "more time in attacking areas – over 19% of play the balls are inside 20 metres, up from 15% last year." Conversely, only "59% of play the balls are in their own half, also down over 4%."
  • Metres Per Run Allowed: Their overall metres per run allowed is "the third lowest in the NRL at just 8.2 per carry," which is "the clubs lowest in a decade". This is attributed to a focus on "wrapping up ball carriers," leading to a significant drop in post-contact metres.
  • Influence of Adam Reynolds: Maguire has placed "more responsibility in Adam Reynolds this year," whose non-yardage usage rate ranks "third in the NRL". Reynolds has had four games above 40% usage this season, out of only 25 such games in the NRL.
  • Resilience Despite Injuries: The team has achieved this improvement "without key players as well with Reece Walsh, Ben Hunt and Ezra mam missing significant time, as well as a slew of injuries affecting their edge backrowers."

2. Pervasive Second Half Slump​

  • Average Margin Decline: While leading by an average of 5.06 points at half-time, their "final average margin after 80 minutes is just 4.82 meaning they’re losing their second halves by an average of 0.24 points per game."
  • Conceded Points: They "concede 59% of their points in the second half, which is the 4th worst rate in the NRL for second halves."
  • Critical Period: "Almost 20% of that 59% comes between the 51st and 59th minutes, the highest percentage during that time in the NRL."
  • Second Half Record: Brisbane's record in the "41st to 80th minutes" is a dismal "5-11-1 in second halves this season," compared to 10-6-1 in the first 40 minutes.
  • Offloads Allowed (Second Half): The Broncos' focus on stopping ball carriers "doesn’t last, as Brisbane’s number [offloads allowed per set] doubles in the second half to 0.26, placing them mid table."
  • Ball Control Issues:"55% of their total errors occur after half time, higher than the NRL average of 51%."
  • They are "16th at -14" in net errors for the second half, with "only the diabolical Newcastle Knights at -34 have less ball control for second periods in 2025."
  • This leads to the "biggest drop in complete sets by half in the NRL," going from 0.25 (one in four sets) to 0.32 (one in three sets) from first to second half.
  • Opponent Possession: These mistakes lead to "more opponent possession," with Brisbane "conceding more than 20 total sets to their opponents after half time," again "only trailing the Knights."
  • Set Restarts: While penalties are consistent across halves, the Broncos are "worst in the NRL" for net restarts conceded (-24 overall), with most "coming in the second half as mentioned – they are -8 in the first half but -16 in the second half."

3. Structural/Historical Weaknesses​

  • Back Three Contribution: The Broncos "routinely have the lowest contribution from their back three to the teams total run metres," generating "only 25% of their total run metres from their back three, the lowest share in the NRL." This is a "historic" issue independent of coaching.
  • Reliance on Forwards: The team heavily relies on key forwards like Payne Haas (11.1% of total yardage, 9th in NRL, only forward in top 20) and Pat Carrigan (over 10%) for yardage. This "dependence on forwards to create yardage" puts "even more pressure" on them if the back three have a bad yardage game.

Implications and Outlook​

  • Missed Opportunity: The second-half struggles "mask their flame outs in the second half though" and prevent them from capitalising on strong first-half performances.
  • Impact on Finals: This flaw must be overcome "to play meaningful September football." The author notes, "a low effort second half isn’t going to cut it against the Melbourne’s and Canberra’s of the competition."
  • Coach's Focus: Queensland coach Billy Slater "noticed earlier in the season" this second-half drop-off.
  • Potential for Premiership: If the club can "stay healthy and maintain a level of focus across 80 minutes, they may have a shot at winning one of the most wide open NRL premierships in history."
  • Areas for Improvement: The second-half issue "isn’t a serious issue for the club but should be a key focus, and most of it is coming from areas that can be worked at," particularly ball control, error rates, and conceding set restarts.
Thanks - I really meant there are many pretty graphs buried in the report which reveal Eels stats.
cheers.gif
 

Chipmunk

Coach
Messages
18,037
Thanks - I really meant there are many pretty graphs buried in the report which reveal Eels stats.
cheers.gif
The sources do offer several insights into the Parramatta Eels' performance across various metrics for Rounds 1-19 of the 2025 season:
  • Run Metres:
    • The Back 3 players for Parramatta contributed 32.0% of the team's average run metres per game, while the "Others" (rest of the team) contributed 68.0%. This places Parramatta second highest in the league for Back 3 contribution to run metres, behind only the Sydney Roosters.
  • Penalties and Set Restarts:
    • Parramatta was awarded an average of 8.9 total penalties (penalties + set restarts) per game and conceded an average of 8.7 total penalties per game.
  • Sets by Opponents:
    • Opponents playing against Parramatta averaged 21.6 complete sets in the first half and 20.3 complete sets in the second half.
  • Repeat Set Conversion to Try:
    • Parramatta has a 16.4% conversion rate for repeat sets leading to a try. This means that for every 100 repeat sets, approximately 16.4 of them result in a try.
  • Metres Per Run (Opponent):
    • Opponents averaged 8.79 metres per run against Parramatta. This is among the higher values in the league, indicating that opponents gain significant yardage per run when playing against Parramatta.
  • Game State (Minutes Played):
    • Parramatta spent a relatively small proportion of their minutes leading (25.0%) during games.
    • They spent the majority of their minutes trailing (58.8%).
    • They spent 16.3% of their minutes with scores even. This suggests that Parramatta has spent a significant amount of time playing from behind in matches.
  • Points Conceded:
    • Parramatta conceded 44.1% of their total points in the second halves of games. This is one of the lowest percentages in the league, indicating that they concede a smaller proportion of their total points in the second half compared to many other teams.
  • Cumulative Net Set Restarts (Second Halves only):
    • While specific numerical values are not given, the graph indicates Parramatta's trend for cumulative net set restarts (awarded - conceded) in second halves. Their line appears to fluctuate around zero for much of the season, showing periods where they are slightly negative or positive, but it does not exhibit the consistently high positive or negative trends seen in some other teams.
  • Average Errors Per Set (by half):
    • Parramatta's average errors per set by half are presented visually. While specific numbers are not labelled for Parramatta, their performance can be seen relative to other teams.
  • Cumulative Net Errors (Forced-Made) (Second Halves only):
    • Parramatta's trend for cumulative net errors (forced-made) in second halves is shown. Like with set restarts, their line fluctuates, but it doesn't stand out as consistently high or low compared to teams like Newcastle or Canberra.
  • Average Offloads Per Set by Opponent (by half):
    • The source shows the average offloads per set allowed by Parramatta's opponents. The visual indicates that opponents average fewer offloads per set against Parramatta in the first half compared to the second half.
 

Chipmunk

Coach
Messages
18,037
Thanks - I really meant there are many pretty graphs buried in the report which reveal Eels stats.
cheers.gif
And...

Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Parramatta Eels' performance as depicted in each of the provided graphs, compared to every other team in the NRL (for Rounds 1-19, 2025, unless otherwise specified):
% of average run metres/game by Back 3 vs rest of team:
◦ Parramatta's Back 3 players (fullback and wingers) are significant contributors to their team's attacking metres. Their Back 3 accounted for 32.0% of the team's average run metres per game.
◦ This percentage places Parramatta second highest in the league for Back 3 contribution, just behind the Sydney Roosters (32.3%) and notably above the NRL average of 28.6%.
◦ This indicates a strong reliance on or effectiveness of Parramatta's outside backs in gaining ground, suggesting they are a key attacking outlet or ball-carrying force for the team.
Cumulative net set restarts (awarded - conceded) by team – Second halves only:
◦ Parramatta's trend line for cumulative net set restarts in the second half generally fluctuates around zero for much of the season, indicating a relatively balanced number of set restarts awarded versus conceded in the latter stages of games.
◦ Their line is not as consistently high as teams like Dolphins or St George Illawarra, nor as consistently low as Brisbane or North Queensland, suggesting they don't experience large officiating swings (positive or negative) in the second half over time.
Avg total penalties (penalties + set restarts) awarded v conceded:
◦ Parramatta was awarded an average of 8.9 total penalties (penalties + set restarts) per game.
◦ They conceded an average of 8.7 total penalties per game.
◦ This puts them slightly in favour of awarded penalties (net +0.2).
◦ In terms of penalties conceded, their 8.7 average places them around the middle of the pack compared to other teams, with Dolphins conceding the fewest (7.4) and Brisbane the most (9.6).
Avg total sets by half & opponent:
◦ When playing against Parramatta, opponents averaged 21.6 complete sets in the first half and 20.3 complete sets in the second half.
◦ This suggests that opponents generally have a significant number of attacking opportunities against Parramatta, particularly in the first half.
◦ Their opponents' first-half average of 21.6 sets is among the higher values shown, for example, more than against Canberra (20.9) or Sydney Roosters (20.3), but less than against Penrith (21.7). The second-half average of 20.3 is also relatively high when compared to some teams like Newcastle (19.6) but lower than Dolphins (18.3), indicating some improvement or shift in control in the second half.
Avg errors per set by half & team:
◦ While specific numerical values for Parramatta are not explicitly labelled on the chart, their position indicates they have an average error rate per set that is neither exceptionally high nor low compared to other teams.
◦ Visually, Parramatta appears to have a slightly lower error rate in the first half compared to the second half, with their second-half error rate similar to teams like St George Illawarra or Sydney Roosters. This positions them better than teams like Newcastle or Brisbane in terms of error management but worse than teams like Warriors or Gold Coast.
Cumulative net errors (forced-made) by team – Second halves only:
◦ Parramatta's cumulative net errors (forced by them minus made by them) in the second halves of games shows a fluctuating trend, generally hovering around the zero mark.
◦ This indicates that over the course of the season, Parramatta has not consistently forced significantly more errors than they have made themselves, nor have they consistently made significantly more errors than they have forced, particularly in the second half. Their line is less extreme than teams with strong positive trends (e.g., Canberra, Warriors) or strong negative trends (e.g., Newcastle, Brisbane).
Metres per run by opponent:
◦ Opponents playing against Parramatta averaged 8.79 metres per run.
◦ This is a relatively high value, placing Parramatta fourth highest in the league for metres conceded per run, behind only St George Illawarra (9.10), Gold Coast Titans (9.08), and South Sydney (8.99).
◦ This suggests that Parramatta's defensive line may be allowing opponents significant yardage on individual runs, which could put their defence under greater pressure or indicate issues with line speed or tackle efficiency.
% of repeat sets that lead to a try:
◦ Parramatta has a 16.4% conversion rate for repeat sets leading to a try.
◦ This ranks them ninth out of the 16 teams listed, placing them in the middle tier for converting repeat sets into tries.
◦ Teams like Manly (19.3%), Melbourne (18.9%), and Penrith (18.5%) have higher conversion rates, indicating greater attacking efficiency after earning repeat sets. This suggests Parramatta could potentially improve their strike rate when given attacking opportunities close to the try line.
Avg offloads per set by opponent (by half):
◦ The graph shows the average offloads per set that Parramatta's opponents are allowed to make.
◦ Visually, opponents average fewer offloads per set against Parramatta in the first half compared to the second half.
◦ Compared to other teams, Parramatta appears to concede a relatively lower average of offloads per set in the first half than many teams (e.g., Gold Coast Titans, Newcastle, North Queensland), indicating they might be more effective at containing opposition offloads early in games. However, in the second half, they allow slightly more offloads per set, though not as many as some of the higher-conceding teams like Gold Coast or Newcastle.
% minutes played by team with scores even/leading/trailing:
◦ Parramatta has spent a significant portion of their game time trailing, at 58.8% of minutes played.
◦ They spent 25.0% of their minutes leading, and 16.3% of their minutes with scores even.
◦ Their percentage of minutes trailing (58.8%) is the second highest in the league, only behind Gold Coast (67.1%).
◦ Conversely, their percentage of minutes leading (25.0%) is the third lowest in the league, only above North Queensland (23.8%) and Gold Coast (21.5%).
◦ This indicates that Parramatta has spent the vast majority of their game time playing from behind, which is a challenging position to be in consistently.
Percentage of total points conceded in second halves:
◦ Parramatta conceded 44.1% of their total points in the second halves of games.
◦ This is the second lowest percentage in the league, just above Penrith (39.2%).
◦ This is a strong defensive statistic, suggesting that Parramatta, despite often trailing, tends to concede a smaller proportion of their overall points in the second half compared to most other teams. This could indicate improved defensive resilience as games progress, or perhaps that their first-half defensive issues contribute disproportionately to their overall points conceded.
 
Top