Dave Q
Coach
- Messages
- 11,065
Greetings fellow Elliot and Panther fans.
I know we are not meant to have memories in rugby league, but I recall the circumstances of Elliot's recruitment earlier this year. An interesting question arises.
As we know, Lang was upset as Elliot had been recruited behind his back. Lang told us that he was promised that he would be consulted before the club recruited anybody else. He told the whole of Sydney as well.
The club's explanation at the time appeared to be that they had to snare Elliot as sson as possible and that there was no time to consult with Lang.
On that basis, you would think that the club had minutes or seconds to make its decision.
But over at another forum, one of my hero's, Andrew Farrell interviewed Elliot and Elliot said that he chose the Panthers as they were a beacon etc etc, On that account, I gathered that he had options and the time to consider the Panthers offer as opposed to others.
If he had time to consider it, why didnt the club take the opportunity to tell Lang? Or alternatively, has Elliot just presented us with a feel-good line in his initial interview?
In the long run, it doesnt matter as its over now and Elliot and his restructuring is now firmly in place.
But can someone clear this up this apparent inconsistency for me?
And in what circumstances is it reasonable for a club to maintain a curtain of secrecy over these sensitive appointments. Never, Sometimes, Always?
In the final part of this series we will examine player recruitment.
I know we are not meant to have memories in rugby league, but I recall the circumstances of Elliot's recruitment earlier this year. An interesting question arises.
As we know, Lang was upset as Elliot had been recruited behind his back. Lang told us that he was promised that he would be consulted before the club recruited anybody else. He told the whole of Sydney as well.
The club's explanation at the time appeared to be that they had to snare Elliot as sson as possible and that there was no time to consult with Lang.
On that basis, you would think that the club had minutes or seconds to make its decision.
But over at another forum, one of my hero's, Andrew Farrell interviewed Elliot and Elliot said that he chose the Panthers as they were a beacon etc etc, On that account, I gathered that he had options and the time to consider the Panthers offer as opposed to others.
If he had time to consider it, why didnt the club take the opportunity to tell Lang? Or alternatively, has Elliot just presented us with a feel-good line in his initial interview?
In the long run, it doesnt matter as its over now and Elliot and his restructuring is now firmly in place.
But can someone clear this up this apparent inconsistency for me?
And in what circumstances is it reasonable for a club to maintain a curtain of secrecy over these sensitive appointments. Never, Sometimes, Always?
In the final part of this series we will examine player recruitment.