Wtf was Col thinking there?
Nobody was saying it at the timeIs the difference going to be that KW bowled Munro for 8 expensive overs, and Santner only got 2 overs? On a slow wicket that seems really stupid frankly.
I wondered at the time too, I meant the expertsEarlier in the thread I did actually infer it. The only thought I had is maybe injury. Otherwise Munro was bowling pies and it seemed a rank bad decision.
The great Woakes has to be reintroduced