bluefox1968
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,421
Dont agree with Brisbane MK II.
Dilutes the juniors. Concentrates the teams too closely together. Reduces the pool of players for Sydney to draw on and lets face it the better ones are coming out of Queensland. The opposite and perhaps upside is Sydney clubs would have to llok to their own juniors and what’s left of the CRL.
If it needs to be Queensland I reckon between Cows and Broncs. Rockhampton perhaps.
A team in another state becomes another pseudo Queensland team anyway like the Brisbane Storm.
For infrastructure, current growth, true expansion, current player numbers, past crowd figures, money, TV needs, lifestyle the other likely team would seem to be Perth.
I like the idea of an Ipswich [Jets] team, as it is a RL heartland, it is a separate city (although adjoining) to Brisbane...
However, unfortunately, I think the NRL will go 'Bombers', which is the worst name for a RL team ever, and has no relevance to Brisbane (AFAIK)... At least Amberley (Ipswich) has a RAAF base.
Also, I think PNG would be notionally better than Perth, but I agree with all of the above comments - not many white Australians would want to live in Port Moresby!!!
So, yep, I'm on the '4th QLD team' & Perth bandwagon, and yes, I would like to see 2 Sydney teams go [relocate?], with an NZ and maybe a Qld-based PNG team the 3rd & 4th expansion candidates.