What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Extra time - Yay or nay

Extra time in regular season games…

  • Keep it?

    Votes: 10 28.6%
  • Get rid of it?

    Votes: 25 71.4%

  • Total voters
    35

ed-grimley

Bench
Messages
2,552
Should extra time to produce a winner in games that don't actually need one be kept or booted?
Remember that a draw is actually a result.
You decide.
 

Knight76

Juniors
Messages
2,045
Personally, I'd like to see each team given a point each in recognition of the draw after 80, then play on for golden point. Whoever scores first gets an additional point.

The only thing with this is it upsets the 2 points per game distributed system.
 
Messages
15,545
I would keep it but make it not sudden death.

Play 80 - drawn game = another 5 minutes each way.
Play 90 - drawn game = draw

Nothing worse than these sudden death field goal miss-a-thons that we see now.
 

ed-grimley

Bench
Messages
2,552
Personally I can't see anything wrong with the system that operated for decades i.e.. 1 point each for a draw at the end of 80. Extra time has just created problems that didn't exist.
 

Lambretta

First Grade
Messages
8,689
It may well change the table scoring process but the NHL hasn't looked back since they did it.

The Raiders deserved a point on Saturday.

Actually, the Raiders deserved two, that was never a forward pass

That aside, the Raiders and Cowboys should have shared the point. It was a great game and a draw was a fair result.

I never agreed with the introduction of Golden Point in the first place. At the time I said it was a clusterf**k idea designed to appease the worst kind of cry babies, who when they lost a few Golden Point games would wah wah wah about getting it changed back

There has never been anything wrong with a draw. If both teams play hard to the 80th minute and you can't split them, then a point each is fine. This also add a level of interest to the league table when teams end up on odd points

If we absolutely, have to have golden shower, then the losing team should get a point anyway.
 

POPEYE

Coach
Messages
11,397
I'd like to see the game played for 80 minutes, draws are ok . . . most forwards and Hayne struggle to concentrate for anywhere near that
 

TiggaPlease

Guest
Messages
891
A game is 80 minutes and a draw is a legitimate result is my preference by a long way.

If the NRL insist on keeping it for regular season matches (which we all know they will) then the scoring system needs to be altered to something similar to what @Johns Magic proposed above.
 

T-Boon

Coach
Messages
15,890
Yes. Extra time 5 minutes each way (or golden try). Get rid of golden point make it 11 on 11.
Extra time is exciting theatre. But boring game play because of the field goal shoot out. TV likes it because it rates well. Its not going away so just improve it.
 
Messages
3,309
Get rid of it, a point each for me.

But while the 'clever' people who run the game are still in place it will most likely stay, if that's the case, go with the point each at full time, have golden try or penalty and the winner gets the bonus point, if no try or penalty, a point each.

There's bigger issues in the game though e.g.
each team should play each other twice - get rid of pre season and golden point,
stop giving Brisbane Friday or Thursday night football - why can't the Warriors play every Sunday afternoon? or the Raiders every Saturday afternoon, Newcastle every Sunday afternoon, Storm every Saturday night as they are all 1 city teams - it's a rort.
 

Clifferd

Coach
Messages
10,805
Keep it a draw, if the end result has the scores locked up chances are both teams are equal and nobody really deserves to lose by a Fkin field goal

Have extra time for games that need a result obviously, finals and origin
 

Latest posts

Top