crouching_tiger
Juniors
- Messages
- 779
Think it's fu9ked again. That's why he's been poor in the last few weeks and is opting not to run the ball like he usually does. :roll:
Not suprised.
And to think we could of had Flanno to take over. So whats going to happen when Farah needs that dreaded operation and we have no hooker for a year? bring in utilities? :roll:
I really think losing Flanagan is going to bite us in the rear with Farah and his back.
Brown ---> (possibly) Warriors
I don't mind a creative player who runs at the line but rarely looks to get a pass away.Flanno once again struggled a bit at 5/8th or 2nd receiver last week. Adam Bennett was playing the hooking role. Stuey is more like a Buderus, Toovey hole runner adapting a Farah-esque elusiveness to his game, whereas Brown has the size to make him quite versatile as a backrower also. Brown should also learn to look for support players running off him as he makes a great initial linebreak but can be sometimes caught too often with the ball in hand.
I don't mind a creative player who runs at the line but rarely looks to get a pass away.
It's miles better than passing without troubling the defence
Oxymoron - if they just catch and pass then they are not a playmaker.No, I understood your post. I'd still rather have a player who does what Brown does, as you say, than have a playmaker who just catches and passes the ball.
Brown only has to offload once a game after making the hole to break the defence. Every time after that, they'd be uncertain if he were going to pass or not.
Uncertainty by the defence is the greatest asset any attacking player can have imo