The NRL is a tougher comp than ESL - I don't think anyone would disagree. I do though feel that Aussies/Kiwis perhaps overstate the difference.
A common perception that I encounter is that half the ESL teams are weak - therefore 50% of a "good" teams games will be lacking intensity. In the recent past I'd have gone along with this but I don't think it's the case now.
Firstly - upsets in ESL are becoming more and more common, so the argument of 6 weak teams is less true now than it has been in the past.
Secondly - with the extra fixture system in ESL the top teams have played extra fixtures amongst themselves - increasing the proportion of tough, intense games.
Thirdly - on top of the extra fixtures the play-off & GF (a very recent addition to deciding the UKRL champions) has brought YET ANOTHER extra pressure cooker aspect to top ESL teams.
In effect - for a top side as many as 80% of its' fixtures may be against other top sides - a very marked contrast to recent years and probably in line with top NRL sides (for example top NRL teams do not lose sleep over the prospect of playing Souths/Manly ....etc atm).
These changes - coupled with the fact that UKRL sides are fot the first time EVER sytematically identifying and developing young talent (don't forget that GB are the dominant nation in youth RL atm) and you have the reason for recent improvement in the GB Lions performance.
And the good news - it's an improvement that's going to continue
8) :mrgreen: