ShadesOfTheSun
Juniors
- Messages
- 646
What amazes me is that people who say it doesn't matter who won the fight, because GB won the game, are spending so much time trying to convince others that the fight was unfair, that one person involved just got lucky, or that the outcome was somehow voided by the melee that followed. The amount of attention you guys are dedicating to belittling Mason's punch as well as his character suggests to me that it bothers you more than you're willing to let on that Fielden fared so poorly in the fight. First it was 'it was a cheap shot', then '...but Peacock decked him anyway', and then 'and Mason's punch was just lucky!'Fairleigh Good! said:Any dog can throw a lucky punch. I've seen people almost killed through people throwing lucky punches like that. Mason proved his cowardice just minutes later with the assault on Sean Long.
Which is what most people are bothered about. GB only cited Mason for the punch because of the ridiculous and insulting decision to rule he had no case to answer for the elbow. Even Fielden himself has come out in the press to say he didn't deserve a ban for the punch, but everyone bar the disciplinary panel (Who have ticket sales for the final in that hell hole league backwater Sydney to worry about) and a few geniused Australian's like that fat fu$k Gould and Ricky Stuart can see he should be banned for the Long elbow.
It also amazes me that Mason hasn't appologised for that incident.
If league is not about boxing, as many of you GB fans have stated, and all that mattered was the outcome of the game, then why is this ridiculous issue dominating all of the attention at the moment? It wouldn't make a difference to Mason's penalty whether his hit caught Fielden off guard, whether it was lucky or cheap or good, so why should it matter to you? You have all been telling the Aussies on the board that a player's quality is not determined by his ability to box, so why does it matter whether or not Fielden has a glass jaw?
You won't get any argument about Mason being a scumbag from me, but it is actually possible to be a coward and be able to throw a good punch at the same time, you know. The most pertinent question, to me, is why it matters how good a punch Mason can throw. His ability as a boxer has nothing to do with his ability as a player - who cares how good or bad he is at brawling?