- Messages
- 20,281
Should these three nations be allowed to continue playing rugby tests as stand alone nations? In the light of the 90 odd point thrashing the AB's handed Fiji (the strongest of the three) this evening, I think not.
Last year, the combined Pacific Islands team thrashed the NSW Waratahs, and gave the Wallabies and Springboks a run for their money. So why should the IRB not say that from now on, they have to play as a unified team?
I know what you're thinking, this will de-value the sport as a national game. Why? I mean, look at cricket. Imagine, if Barbados, Jamaica, etc. had to compete as stand alone nations. It'd be even more embarassing than it already is. Instead, the unified West Indies puts up a respectable fight.
So why shouldnt the Pacific Islanders play as a unfied nation on a regular basis, and the national teams be restricted to inter-island competitions?
Last year, the combined Pacific Islands team thrashed the NSW Waratahs, and gave the Wallabies and Springboks a run for their money. So why should the IRB not say that from now on, they have to play as a unified team?
I know what you're thinking, this will de-value the sport as a national game. Why? I mean, look at cricket. Imagine, if Barbados, Jamaica, etc. had to compete as stand alone nations. It'd be even more embarassing than it already is. Instead, the unified West Indies puts up a respectable fight.
So why shouldnt the Pacific Islanders play as a unfied nation on a regular basis, and the national teams be restricted to inter-island competitions?