titoelcolombiano
First Grade
- Messages
- 6,632
Relevant, only Sydney club that would conceivably relocate. No NRL club is moving, that time has passed.Wrong thread
Relevant, only Sydney club that would conceivably relocate. No NRL club is moving, that time has passed.Wrong thread
Agree that the Sydney clubs have no incentive to relocate now. The game has spent the last 20-30 years propping them up at the expense of everything else.I don't think fans of a new expansion team would want a relocated Sydney club. If anything, the fun and games of relocating Sydney clubs should've occurred 25 years ago.
Imagine if a club like Penrith got relocated?
In the NRL era, they have produced so many players and have won 4 premierships. How silly would that have been?
Agree that the Sydney clubs have no incentive to relocate now. The game has spent the last 20-30 years propping them up at the expense of everything else.
However that hypothetical is faulty; there are nine clubs in Sydney... Cleary & co would've come through under Parra or any of the other suburban clubs within easy driving distance.
Now ask yourself how many Cleary-like players we've missed out on by not having clubs/pathways in cities with millions of people (Perth/Adelaide) or regions that only have a tiny number of professional spots and kids have been passed over or given up (SEQ/NZ).
Yes I agree. I read recently that there are now 5000 players in the various Victorian rugby league competitions. Although this number is small, it is growth and will hopefully keep growing. Without the Melbourne Storm, I doubt they would have ever reached this figure.Now ask yourself how many Cleary-like players we've missed out on by not having clubs/pathways in cities with millions of people (Perth/Adelaide) or regions that only have a tiny number of professional spots and kids have been passed over or given up (SEQ/NZ).
I agree with these points and thankfully the NRL is in the best position that it has been in for a long time. I don't think we should give up on expanding to NZ2, Perth and Adelaide as I think in the long run, it will bring more money into the game.But for the overall bigger picture, the code missed out big time when it was part owned by a media company for 15 years. NRL missed out on millions of tv revenue because in rights negotiations, it was negotiating with itself.
For 15 years, News was making money, while the code was sitting still. If only the game was independent right throughout. Maybe more players would've come through to fill 20 teams. But we will never know.
Bringing that statement back to relocation, if ONE EXISTING Sydney team was to be relocated to NZ or Adelaide or Perth or Brisbane (say, Western Corridor) - then the other 3 from that list could be expansion teams 18, 19 and 20.I agree with these points and thankfully the NRL is in the best position that it has been in for a long time. I don't think we should give up on expanding to NZ2, Perth and Adelaide as I think in the long run, it will bring more money into the game.
Bringing that statement back to relocation, if ONE EXISTING Sydney team was to be relocated to NZ or Adelaide or Perth or Brisbane (say, Western Corridor) - then the other 3 from that list could be expansion teams 18, 19 and 20.
Then we'd have a competition with 3 Brisbane teams, 2 NZ teams, North Queensland, Gold Coast, Canberra, a heap of Sydney teams, plus a team each in Melbourne, Adelaide & Perth - all done with a 20-team competition.
What makes you think that?Sharks and Bulldogs
Could be tempted to relocate
Or just permanently relocate to Perth.The Sharks should split their games between Cronulla and Gosford. They're going to get left behind if they remain just a Sydney club.
For business reasonsWhat makes you think that?
Just curious as to your reasoning those two teams could be in that position, given how generous the NRL grant is.
they tried that years ago, NRL knocked them backThe Sharks should split their games between Cronulla and Gosford. They're going to get left behind if they remain just a Sydney club.
Should try again as different times or better yet the NRL should just enforce such a move.they tried that years ago, NRL knocked them back
Sharks to Adelaide (Adelaide Sharks)Sharks should either relocate to Perth or Adelaide playing an annual “home game” at shark park.
Theres a lot to like about thatSharks to Adelaide (Adelaide Sharks)
Team 18 - Add Perth (Whether that's Pirates or the much lauded joint-venture with Bears)
Team 19 - Add NZ 2 (Open up to bids, choose the best business case)
Team 20 - Add another Queensland team. Open it up to bids from anywhere in Queensland - from Ipswich to East Brisbane Tigers to Central Queensland... and choose the one with most compelling business case.
This scenario would make me cream my shorts!!!Sharks to Adelaide (Adelaide Sharks)
Team 18 - Add Perth (Whether that's Pirates or the much lauded joint-venture with Bears)
Team 19 - Add NZ 2 (Open up to bids, choose the best business case)
Team 20 - Add another Queensland team. Open it up to bids from anywhere in Queensland - from Ipswich to East Brisbane Tigers to Central Queensland... and choose the one with most compelling business case.
It delivers a 20 team competition that's set for some time to come.Theres a lot to like about that