Slackboy72
Coach
- Messages
- 12,128
So would Tottenham apparently based on their 2019/20 run.Arsenal would qualify for the Champions League based on UEFAs latest amendments.
So would Tottenham apparently based on their 2019/20 run.Arsenal would qualify for the Champions League based on UEFAs latest amendments.
Now that this is over can we hold UEFA to account, please? This 2024 nonsense is just as bad as the ESL.
At least with UEFA that is a chance you can improve them for the betterment of the sportUEFA's greed began the whole situation. Third place in England walks into the 'Champions' League while Scottish Champions have to go through qualifying because they value Arsenal and City over clubs like Celtic that have actually won a European Cup.
The main difference between UEFA and the Euro SL is UEFA being cut out.
At least with UEFA that is a chance you can improve them for the betterment of the sport
When the money is controlled by privately held clubs then the money is going to go to shareholders, with a bit to players, staff and maybe some investment in ground improvements
Who do you think is more likely to help smaller nations - UEFA or Glazer?UEFA are just as guilty as the clubs of being greedy. They don't care about the poorer nations, it's why they make it easier for 3rd place in England to qualify ahead of 1st place in Scotland. They don't care about the betterment of the sport, only the betterment of their value and it has left traditionally strong clubs in small markets behind as a result, creating a gulf between the 'top 4' leagues and the rest. It's why the alterations to qualifying make it even easier for also rans in the top leagues to qualify than actual champions.
Who do you think is more likely to help smaller nations - UEFA or Glazer?
To be fair.... I’d probably back the 3rd, 4th and probably 5th place team in the EPL to beat the old firm in a two leg playoff.UEFA are just as guilty as the clubs of being greedy. They don't care about the poorer nations, it's why they make it easier for 3rd place in England to qualify ahead of 1st place in Scotland. They don't care about the betterment of the sport, only the betterment of their value and it has left traditionally strong clubs in small markets behind as a result, creating a gulf between the 'top 4' leagues and the rest. It's why the alterations to qualifying make it even easier for also rans in the top leagues to qualify than actual champions.
To be fair.... I’d probably back the 3rd, 4th and probably 5th place team in the EPL to beat the old firm in a two leg playoff.
Not that it makes it right or fair... but you have to balance whether having the 3rd place EPL team is more appealing and actually more competitive than having the SPL champions.
Neither. That’s the problem.Who do you think is more likely to help smaller nations - UEFA or Glazer?
It would be if they hadn’t been hinting about the move for 20 years.Is this the biggest failure to read the room in the history of professional sports?
To be fair.... I’d probably back the 3rd, 4th and probably 5th place team in the EPL to beat the old firm in a two leg playoff.
Not that it makes it right or fair... but you have to balance whether having the 3rd place EPL team is more appealing and actually more competitive than having the SPL champions.
If clubs are crying poor then it’s probably time to reduce the massive wages they pay the superstars
how do you do that when they are under contract ?
As in after their contracts or control of transfer fees
The next few transfer windows should see the transfer fees decrease if clubs seriously want to control spending