What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Former Panthers in the NRL

betcats

Referee
Messages
23,956
That whole side was poor that night too

No doubt. Waqa certainly would of stiffened the defence up that night but still, could we of held them to less than two tries? The way we played that night I think they find a way to score even with out Naden rolling out the red carpet for staggs
 

franklin2323

Immortal
Messages
33,546
No doubt. Waqa certainly would of stiffened the defence up that night but still, could we of held them to less than two tries? The way we played that night I think they find a way to score even with out Naden rolling out the red carpet for staggs

They were going straight up the guts to. We were dropping balls so I doubt it changes
 

betcats

Referee
Messages
23,956
3 tries, 5 odd line breaks down that side. Mansour involved too but Naden didn’t lay a hand on Staggs all night. Was a carve up. Not in a million years would they have had half the success with Blake there.

That side was Kikau Maloney Naden Mansour was it not? They all have shockers in them, swap Naden for Blake and there’s still plenty of cracks to try out. We had 50 percent of the possession, we completed at 70 percent and missed 50 tackles.
 

franklin2323

Immortal
Messages
33,546
That side was Kikau Maloney Naden Mansour was it not? They all have shockers in them, swap Naden for Blake and there’s still plenty of cracks to try out. We had 50 percent of the possession, we completed at 70 percent and missed 50 tackles.

Started out Martin. Kikau was moved to try to help but that whole side is poor defenders
 

martielang

Bench
Messages
3,498
That side was Kikau Maloney Naden Mansour was it not? They all have shockers in them, swap Naden for Blake and there’s still plenty of cracks to try out. We had 50 percent of the possession, we completed at 70 percent and missed 50 tackles.

Happy for you to point out a game where Blake made half that many defensive mistakes.

Not sure why it’s so difficult to just admit an obviously better player (Blake) would of done a better job then his less experienced replacement who spent 80 mins shirt grabbing air. He was targeted & it was clearly successful as they scored numerous tries + a tonne of line breaks.

I’m not saying I’d kick Naden to the curb & not feed him, nor that he won’t significantly improve his defence with more experience, but f**k me if you still don’t think Blake would of affected that game you’re more stubborn then my mrs.
 

billypilgrimnz

First Grade
Messages
5,168
It's gonna be a bloody long off-season if we are already trawling the bottom of the barrel with "if Player X had played Game Y, we would have won/lost".
 

betcats

Referee
Messages
23,956
Happy for you to point out a game where Blake made half that many defensive mistakes.

Not sure why it’s so difficult to just admit an obviously better player (Blake) would of done a better job then his less experienced replacement who spent 80 mins shirt grabbing air. He was targeted & it was clearly successful as they scored numerous tries + a tonne of line breaks.

I’m not saying I’d kick Naden to the curb & not feed him, nor that he won’t significantly improve his defence with more experience, but f**k me if you still don’t think Blake would of affected that game you’re more stubborn then my mrs.

You are an idiot I’ve already said he’d do better defensively. 70 percent completions and 50 missed tackles is is losing football, Blake doesn’t change that.
 
Last edited:

betcats

Referee
Messages
23,956
Couldn't resist, huh? You alright there, bud? This is pretty desperate, even for you.

95 percent of your comments are having a whinge about what other people are talking about or feeling bad for the poor old tigers fans. Why are you so worried about what others are doing? Every offseason you must post that same comment at least once, its kinda sad Billy, if you are so against what some people post use the ignore function that is what is there for, but I suspect you are just one of those sooks who loves a reason for a good whinge, gives you something to post at least. You literally contribute nothing except sarcastic rubbish and complaining about people using the forum.
 

billypilgrimnz

First Grade
Messages
5,168
Why are you so worried about what others are doing? .

Indeed.

Keep beating that drum. One day I may care about your in-depth feelings on my posting habits, but today is not that day. Enjoy getting angry over what other people type though - I wouldn't want to take that away from you.
 

ACTPanthers

Bench
Messages
4,852
Indeed.

Keep beating that drum. One day I may care about your in-depth feelings on my posting habits, but today is not that day. Enjoy getting angry over what other people type though - I wouldn't want to take that away from you.

A bit hypocritical when you literally posted this about 12 hrs earlier...

It's gonna be a bloody long off-season if we are already trawling the bottom of the barrel with "if Player X had played Game Y, we would have won/lost".
 

betcats

Referee
Messages
23,956
Indeed.

Keep beating that drum. One day I may care about your in-depth feelings on my posting habits, but today is not that day. Enjoy getting angry over what other people type though - I wouldn't want to take that away from you.

Really???? You actually are an idiot.
 

ACTPanthers

Bench
Messages
4,852
Show me where I’m angry about it and you might have a case. Or that I say they can’t discuss it. Since I do neither, I’m not sure what the issue is.

Maybe not angry as such, but definitely voicing disdain at others postings... You may not have come out and said "can't" blatantly, but it's entirely obvious as to what your view is on the current discussion.

It's gonna be a bloody long off-season if we are already trawling the bottom of the barrel with "if Player X had played Game Y, we would have won/lost".

Are you really arguing that the above post isn't alluding to the fact you think what others are discussing is pointless? Sorry if I was mistaken, but I seriously doubt I was.
 

Latest posts

Top