Forwards vs Backs

[Red Bear]

Couldnt have one without the other

 

[Marshall_magic]

I'd take it a step further and make a forwards team without specialist hookers in it (adds more novelty value)

1. Mateo
2. Mannering
3. Halatau
4. Sonny
5. Stagg
6. Bird
7. Payten
8. Civonaceva
9. Tongue
10. Price
11. Laffranchi
12. Mason
13. Gallen


Backs
1. Slater
2. Hayne
3. Gasnier
4. Hodges
5. Inglis
6. Thurston
7. Prince
8. Tuiaki
9. Cronk
10. Vatuvei
11. Folau
12. Lewis
13. Anasta

 

[no name]

Backs
1. Slater
2. Hayne
3. Gasnier
4. Hodges
5. Inglis
6. Thurston
7. Prince
8. Tuiaki
9. Cronk
10. Vatuvei
11. Folau
12. Lewis
13. Anasta

You can't have these 2 in the same team. It's against the rules

 

[Marshall_magic]

You can't have these 2 in the same team. It's against the rules

:lol: Them Qld selectors are scared because when they pick both Prince will upstage JT, and they'll realise they should of kept Prince in the side for the 2005 series and beyond.

 

[Tommax25]

Backs

Stewart
Hayne
Hodges
Gasnier
Folau
Anasta
Thurston
Tuiaki
Slater
Vatuvei
Lewis
Grothe
Inglis

Forwards

Mateo
Sutton
Menzies
Mannering
Creah
Bird
Cuthbo
Civoniciva
Smith
Mason
Laffranchi
Hoffman
SBW

 

[northwest9]

hell team, your positionist now???

FTR. i reckon the backs would win, the forwards would get out to a good lead, then stamina would take its toll and the backs would take advantage of holes starting to appear in the defensive line of the forwards

 

[dreary]

then stamina would take its toll and the backs would take advantage of holes

Why do people think the forwards would get fatigued ... half of them would be able to bludge out in the back line.

If anything it would be the backs getting fatigued with the extra mass of tackling and hitups required.

 

[blue bags]

Forward's would dominate. I think

Bigger motor's