What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Foxtel- 'going concern' Loans/costs.

colly

Juniors
Messages
1,023

colly

Juniors
Messages
1,023
Quote Foxtel current cost base is $1.6 billion split between sport/ and Non sport, ie drama
Foxtel will try to lower sports costs ie as with No bid for Rugby and current A league legal/contractual problems.

https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/news-corp-ups-foxtel-loan-to-500m-20190809-p52fev
If above is behind paywall my reply will have full article.

Besides the current corona virus lock down negations for next deal might depend of the viability of Foxtel?
Max Mason 9 /19 AFR


The pressure on Foxtel is unlikely to relent with News Corp tipping in another $200 million of its own cash, taking its total shareholder loans to the pay TV giant to half a billion dollars.

The Australian Financial Review first revealed that Foxtel was struggling to complete a $2.5 billion refinance and would need a $500 million injection of funds, which could be coming from News Corp’s balance sheet, to help negotiate a package with banks.

b4682377.gif

Foxtel now has $500 million in shareholder loans from News Corp. Bloomberg

On Friday morning, News Corp chief financial officer Susan Panuccio confirmed an additional $200 million shareholder loan to Foxtel, covering a $US142 million ($209 million) credit facility that expired on May 30.

“We issued Foxtel a $200 million shareholder loan in May at a variable interest rate of approximately 9 per cent, as we continue to work with banks on refinancing upcoming maturities,” Ms Panuccio said.

This comes in addition to a $300 million shareholder loan News Corp extended Foxtel in April. Foxtel had an additional $US150 million US private placement debt mature on July 25, which was not mentioned on News Corp’s earnings call on Friday morning.

Foxtel is 65 per cent owned by News Corp. The further 35 per cent is owned by Telstra and the Australian telecommunications giant is not believed to have taken part in shareholder loans to Foxtel.

Foxtel’s new total debt position has not been updated to the market, which is expected overnight. Not including the $500 million News Corp has loaned Foxtel, the pay TV giant had an additional $US1.18 billion in borrowings as of March 31.

Refinance plans
Ms Panuccio has been running a refinance of Foxtel out of News Corp’s New York headquarters. News Corp has been looking to refinance Foxtel’s significant debt and give it additional funds to help with its push into streaming and fight against rivals such as Netflix and Stan, which is owned by Nine, publisher of the Financial Review.

Foxtel launched its sports streaming service Kayo in November last year, which on Friday reported 331,000 paying subscribers as of June 30. The pay TV provider is also working on a drama and entertainment streaming service - the initiative was formally known internally as Project Jupiter, but that has now moved onto Project Ares.

Kayo, when it was in its development phase, was known as Project Martian. The project names are born out of Foxtel chief executive Patrick Delany's obsession with Ridley Scott's 2015 science fiction blockbuster The Martian, starring Matt Damon.

"The fundamental principle applies that if we thought that Kayo was successful then we would proceed with the new product. What we are seeing at Kayo is success," News Corp chief executive Robert Thomson said.

The pay TV giant is also trying to reduce its $2.56 billion cost base – $1.6 billion of which is on programming, split 50-50 on sport and non-sport. News Corp has flagged it will look to reduce spending on ”non-marquee” sport.

On a like-for-like basis, revenue in News Corp’s subscription video services division, which is largely Foxtel, fell 13 per cent in 2018-19 to $US2.2 billion. Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation slumped 30 per cent to $US380 million over the financial year, compared with the previous year. News Corp said this was due to lower broadcast subscribers, changes in subscriber packages, an extra $US95 million in sport-related costs with NRL and cricket, and marketing costs related to Kayo.

Kayo's 331,000 paying customers as of June 30 was up from 209,000 in early May. Foxtel Now, the company’s streaming service that replicates broadcast, had 446,000 paying subscribers, a 32 per cent jump over the 2018-19 financial year.

Foxtel’s broadcast and commercial subscriber base was 2.4 million, unchanged from March 30. Churn, the percentage of customers leaving, was 14.7 per cent in the three months to June 30, up from 12.5 per cent in the same period last year, but down from 17.7 per cent in the March quarter of this year.

Mr Thomson stressed Foxtel churn was not customers spinning down to Kayo, which is $25, much cheaper than broadcast Foxtel.

“At Foxtel, paying subscribers for the Kayo sports streaming service more than doubled between the third and fourth quarters to 331,000, while average churn among sports subscribers to the Foxtel broadcast service actually fell during the same period,” Mr Thomson said.

“Clearly, Kayo is adding significantly to the total number of sports viewers in Australia prepared to pay for premium content.”
 

colly

Juniors
Messages
1,023
Max Mason 9 /19 AFR


The pressure on Foxtel is unlikely to relent with News Corp tipping in another $200 million of its own cash, taking its total shareholder loans to the pay TV giant to half a billion dollars.

The Australian Financial Review first revealed that Foxtel was struggling to complete a $2.5 billion refinance and would need a $500 million injection of funds, which could be coming from News Corp’s balance sheet, to help negotiate a package with banks.

b4682377.gif

Foxtel now has $500 million in shareholder loans from News Corp. Bloomberg

On Friday morning, News Corp chief financial officer Susan Panuccio confirmed an additional $200 million shareholder loan to Foxtel, covering a $US142 million ($209 million) credit facility that expired on May 30.

“We issued Foxtel a $200 million shareholder loan in May at a variable interest rate of approximately 9 per cent, as we continue to work with banks on refinancing upcoming maturities,” Ms Panuccio said.

This comes in addition to a $300 million shareholder loan News Corp extended Foxtel in April. Foxtel had an additional $US150 million US private placement debt mature on July 25, which was not mentioned on News Corp’s earnings call on Friday morning.

Foxtel is 65 per cent owned by News Corp. The further 35 per cent is owned by Telstra and the Australian telecommunications giant is not believed to have taken part in shareholder loans to Foxtel.

Foxtel’s new total debt position has not been updated to the market, which is expected overnight. Not including the $500 million News Corp has loaned Foxtel, the pay TV giant had an additional $US1.18 billion in borrowings as of March 31.

Refinance plans
Ms Panuccio has been running a refinance of Foxtel out of News Corp’s New York headquarters. News Corp has been looking to refinance Foxtel’s significant debt and give it additional funds to help with its push into streaming and fight against rivals such as Netflix and Stan, which is owned by Nine, publisher of the Financial Review.

Foxtel launched its sports streaming service Kayo in November last year, which on Friday reported 331,000 paying subscribers as of June 30. The pay TV provider is also working on a drama and entertainment streaming service - the initiative was formally known internally as Project Jupiter, but that has now moved onto Project Ares.

Kayo, when it was in its development phase, was known as Project Martian. The project names are born out of Foxtel chief executive Patrick Delany's obsession with Ridley Scott's 2015 science fiction blockbuster The Martian, starring Matt Damon.

"The fundamental principle applies that if we thought that Kayo was successful then we would proceed with the new product. What we are seeing at Kayo is success," News Corp chief executive Robert Thomson said.

The pay TV giant is also trying to reduce its $2.56 billion cost base – $1.6 billion of which is on programming, split 50-50 on sport and non-sport. News Corp has flagged it will look to reduce spending on ”non-marquee” sport.

On a like-for-like basis, revenue in News Corp’s subscription video services division, which is largely Foxtel, fell 13 per cent in 2018-19 to $US2.2 billion. Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation slumped 30 per cent to $US380 million over the financial year, compared with the previous year. News Corp said this was due to lower broadcast subscribers, changes in subscriber packages, an extra $US95 million in sport-related costs with NRL and cricket, and marketing costs related to Kayo.

Kayo's 331,000 paying customers as of June 30 was up from 209,000 in early May. Foxtel Now, the company’s streaming service that replicates broadcast, had 446,000 paying subscribers, a 32 per cent jump over the 2018-19 financial year.

Foxtel’s broadcast and commercial subscriber base was 2.4 million, unchanged from March 30. Churn, the percentage of customers leaving, was 14.7 per cent in the three months to June 30, up from 12.5 per cent in the same period last year, but down from 17.7 per cent in the March quarter of this year.

Mr Thomson stressed Foxtel churn was not customers spinning down to Kayo, which is $25, much cheaper than broadcast Foxtel.

“At Foxtel, paying subscribers for the Kayo sports streaming service more than doubled between the third and fourth quarters to 331,000, while average churn among sports subscribers to the Foxtel broadcast service actually fell during the same period,” Mr Thomson said.

“Clearly, Kayo is adding significantly to the total number of sports viewers in Australia prepared to pay for premium content.”

Kato subscribers 331 000 which on a yearly basis earns $30 * 331, 000* 12ths= 119,160,000
or close 120 million dollars which has to spread between sports.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
65,957
Nrl needs to be capturing and mentioning Kayo audiences for games, they would be bigger now than main fox sports channel you’d have to think.
Unless fox moves to a much cheaper streaming service ASAP it’s days are numbered. Amazing they’ve just stuck with their old box top business model despite seeing the emergence of streaming, they are probably 2-3 years behind where they should be. Reminds me of the taxi industry!
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
65,957
Kato subscribers 331 000 which on a yearly basis earns $30 * 331, 000* 12ths= 119,160,000
or close 120 million dollars which has to spread between sports.

that’s why it’s hard to see the financial advantage of nrl streaming its own service at the moment. Fox/Telstra pay around $180mill a year to nrl. To cover that plus production costs nrl would need to get around 650k subscribers @ $30 a month.
 

Starkers

Bench
Messages
3,012
Kato subscribers 331 000 which on a yearly basis earns $30 * 331, 000* 12ths= 119,160,000
or close 120 million dollars which has to spread between sports.
that's overs i reckon. kayo offers many deals and i suspect avg price is half that above. but it can go higher and will likely go higher into the future. been a good start though.
 

T-Boon

Coach
Messages
15,331
that’s why it’s hard to see the financial advantage of nrl streaming its own service at the moment. Fox/Telstra pay around $180mill a year to nrl. To cover that plus production costs nrl would need to get around 650k subscribers @ $30 a month.

If the NRL was streaming would they not also be making money out of advertising in addition to subscribers.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
65,957
If the NRL was streaming would they not also be making money out of advertising in addition to subscribers.

they would but the value of that would be very reflective of the audience size. On fta games are getting 700kplus each game and package the advertising across numerous programs. On fox adverts are minimal and usually the same half dozen companies. If only 200k plus were tuning in via streaming advertising would be a lot less.
 

Front-Rower

First Grade
Messages
5,297
Their business model is about as sustainable as Kodak and Blockbuster.

No, not really. Until their biggest customers i.e pubs and clubs, who they earn huge amounts of revenue from, demand delivery via IP then they will continue to deliver via satellite.

Even Optus understands this as they deliver Optus Sports via satellite to registered establishments.
 

Hello, I'm The Doctor

First Grade
Messages
9,124
Nrl needs to be capturing and mentioning Kayo audiences for games, they would be bigger now than main fox sports channel you’d have to think.
Unless fox moves to a much cheaper streaming service ASAP it’s days are numbered. Amazing they’ve just stuck with their old box top business model despite seeing the emergence of streaming, they are probably 2-3 years behind where they should be. Reminds me of the taxi industry!

Step 1. refuse to move with the times
Step 2. blame NRL admin and fans for not being loyal to FOXTEL after so many years of service

(conveniently forget that NRL was underpaid for 20 years and fans were forced to pay for full $100/month package because they had no choice)
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
65,957
But they’ve “invested” in the game and that big bad ceo has wasted all the money! Oh no sorry, that was the Ch9 whinge.
 

colly

Juniors
Messages
1,023
Big NEWS negotiations
The Australian says NRL got a 250 million drwn down loan.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sp...l/news-story/ecbf5760aa2dd8bc0b4a20faf3ff5378

The Australian

The NRL has struck a deal for a $250m lifeline from a group of London banks and financial institutions, giving rugby league both financial breathing space and leverage in its negotiations with broadcaster the Nine Network.

A huge line of credit, which could also come with support from the federal government, will be drawn down by the sport’s governing body and dispersed to needy NRL clubs within weeks, staving off the need for funds from Nine before the competition resumes.

The money will be secured against future income the sport receives, including broadcast and sponsorship revenue under contract until at least 2022, rather than a particular asset.

The NRL had to go offshore to secure its life-saving funding package — unlike the AFL, which last month used its ownership of Marvel Stadium in Melbourne as security on a $600m loan facility from NAB and ANZ.

The $250m line of credit for rugby league, brokered by London firm Oakwell Sports Advisory, will mean the code is less reliant on funding from its broadcasters in the short term as it battles to keep the sport afloat financially during the coronavirus pandemic.

Australian Rugby League Commission chairman Peter V’landys emerged from a key meeting with Nine chief executive Hugh Marks on Tuesday in Sydney, saying he was “buoyed by Mr Marks’s support for rugby league and his commitment to the game”.


ARLC Chairman Peter V'landys. Picture: AAP
READ MORE:Peace talks pave way for NRL kickoff|V’landys ‘buoyed by Nine’s commitment’|Stop the scare campaign, says V’landys|Why Nine is trying to kill NRL Island|Barilaro supports comeback for NRL
Nine last week took the unusual step of publicly criticising NRL management for what a network spokesman said was a mishandling of the game and the wasting of the millions the TV network had invested in the sport.

Mr V’Landys has set a target of May 28 for the NRL to return to action on the field, although the games will be played without crowds for the foreseeable future.

Nine and Fox Sports are contracted to pay the NRL about $300m a year, combined, through to the end of the 2022 season, although there has been speculation that Nine would be happy if rugby league did not return in 2020.

Oakwell and the NRL are set to sign off on the deal within days, and there is an expectation within rugby league circles that the sport will receive $100m to start with and then have a further $150m to draw down if needed.

An interest rate at general market rates for relatively short-term lending will be struck, but that rate will be halved, in effect, if the NRL is able to secure support from the federal government for the loan.

The NRL will disperse the money to clubs on a case-by-case basis, opening the way for some of the poorer clubs to potentially receive more funds than their richer counterparts under strict conditions set by the code’s head office.

It could be a similar move as that undertaken by the AFL, which is imposing strict conditions on most of the clubs in its league, including having each of them report to head office regularly about their balance sheets and their overall financial situation.

Some AFL clubs have said they would not need additional funding from the AFL, including the likes of Hawthorn and Collingwood, while the Adelaide Crows have expressed a preference for sourcing their own financing.

NRL clubs have different funding sources, with half the competition owned by private individuals or groups — or, in the case of the Brisbane Broncos, being listed on the Australian Stock Exchange.

Other clubs are reliant on funding from their licensed clubs, which have all been shut down during the pandemic.

Oakwell has previously brokered deals for investments in sport, such as private equity firm CVC Capital Partners buying 27 per cent of top-flight rugby union in England in a £200m deal in 2018. CVC has reportedly been linked to other rugby union deals around the world, including a potential play for a stake in southern hemisphere rugby.

A source told The Australian CVC was not among the financial institutions that agreed to lend money to the NRL. END OF STORY*************

I just hope that they don't waste it. Typical Australian story with going on about AFL which I am f**king has enough of. Something to lift NRL's hearts old Channel 7 AFL's free to air sponsor/broadcaster is in serious trouble. Falling revenue and loans of over 500 millions. The writing on the board Kerry tokes with 41 % won't be able to save seven. So long seven and AFL's broadcaster bankruptcy await.

The market now values Seven West Media at less than its net debt

https://www.adnews.com.au/news/the-market-now-values-seven-west-media-at-less-than-its-net-debt



 

colly

Juniors
Messages
1,023
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/ch...for-preferred-nrl-future-20200414-p54jsv.html


Channel Nine has outlined a vision of its preferred future NRL television deal at a crisis meeting with ARLC chairman Peter V'landys, with the free-to-air broadcaster favouring two exclusive games per round as part of an extended rights contract.

After Nine boss Hugh Marks met with V'landys at Racing NSW headquarters on Tuesday, sources close to the negotiations told the Herald that Channel Nine, publisher of this masthead, wanted to give up the Thursday night game and concentrate on its traditional Friday night and Sunday afternoon time slots.
It also hopes pay-TV broadcaster Foxtel, who will join Nine and the NRL in negotiations later this week, can be convinced to relinquish its Friday 6pm game as part of a new rights deal that would do away with the current simulcast arrangement.

"Today, Nine CEO Hugh Marks and I had a constructive and co-operative meeting about rugby league in 2020 and beyond," V'landys said in a statement after the meeting.

"I am buoyed by Mr Marks’ support of rugby league and his commitment to the game. The meeting provided us with the opportunity to outline our positions and discuss next steps to navigate this crisis.

"We are both focused on the long-term success of the game and, while there is more work to do, I am optimistic we will find a way through this together. Our next meeting, where we will endeavour to construct a road map for the game this year, must include Foxtel CEO Patrick Delany."

1c041cafe4ce3d205486500eb78517292f3ff123

Hugh Marks on his way out of a meeting with Peter V'landys at Racing NSW offices in Sydney's CBD.Credit:Louie Douvis

The Herald has been told by sources with knowledge of the meeting that Nine also expressed its preference to wipe the 2020 season, in stark contrast to V'landys' push for a May 28 restart. The end result could fall somewhere in the middle.

Nine doesn't want to walk away from the game. It wants a two-year extension, but under different terms and for less than the $110 million it currently pays the governing body each year.

Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the NRL has been unable to deliver on the product its broadcasters had expected as part of a $1.8 billion rights deal over five years. The NRL has enacted the force majeure clause after being left with no choice but to breach its contract with its broadcast partners.

83d8575bc8d13786856f1a8df50d96e3dd5c91a8

Foxtel chief executive Patrick Delany.Credit:James Brickwood

None of the parties involved wants to see the matter head to court, hence the renegotiation that's about to take place between V'landys, Marks and Delany.

V'landys is a realist. It's unlikely the NRL will deliver all of its promised content this year, and the world in which $1.8 billion rugby league broadcast deals are done may no longer exist.

Foxtel has recently made moves to lower its cost base. Only last week it made 200 staff redundant and stood down another 140 employees until the end of June.

Right now Fox Sports broadcasts all eight games, three of which are simulcast with Nine and five exclusive matches.

Changing the structure to suit Nine would also benefit Fox. The fact it has only six exclusive games is unlikely to impact on the number of subscribers - which underpins its business - but will mean it can reduce the $190 million it currently pays for the rights to all eight games.

Under that scenario, both both Fox and Nine win. They want to pay less. The NRL might not be quite as happy with the result but it gets the security of a deal for at least another two years in a climate that is providing very little certainty.

The NRL had been holding out hope of extracting more than $1.8bn in the 2023-2027 rights deal. It could call Nine's bluff, but it runs the risk of attracting even less, if any, revenue from Channel Seven or Channel 10

Then there's the problem of starting a competition that is also meeting some resistance from government.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison, a rugby league tragic, applauded the NRL's determination to return to normality but reiterated a need to adhere to the nation's health advice.

"I like the ambition," Morrison said. "I like they are trying to get the show back on the road in some way. It will be subject to health advice and there will be no special arrangements."

NSW Deputy Premier John Barilaro seems to be the most vocal in his support of a May 28 NRL restart, volunteering to act as a “conduit” between the government and the league

"It’s an ambitious date but you have to set a target,” Barilaro told Fox Sports.

"I’m confident they can have a plan in place, and can get the health experts to sign off on it. It's not against the rules. They have every right to try and return. It's an ambitious date but it is one worth trying to get to."
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
65,957
Not so sure about this? One of the big increases in subscribers two years ago was due to all 8 games live I thought?

"Changing the structure to suit Nine would also benefit Fox. The fact it has only six exclusive games is unlikely to impact on the number of subscribers"
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
65,957
There's still 2 years, after this season, to go on the current deal. No need to rush anything. Ch9 are showing their cards early which could be to the NRL's advantage as long as they dont fold. Ch10 can see an opening, NRL will get a sense if they are legit in trying to get through it. Let this year play out with a reworked deal that everyone is happy with then start the negotiations next year when normality has returned and a proper open tender process can be undertaken. NRL would be nuts to agree to any extension under what Ch9 are wanting. The game cant afford less FTA coverage, the game cant afford not to have a competitive bidding environment and the game cant afford to be saddled with a aprtner like Ch9 for another 6 years!
 

Dragonwest

Juniors
Messages
1,658
There's still 2 years, after this season, to go on the current deal. No need to rush anything. Ch9 are showing their cards early which could be to the NRL's advantage as long as they dont fold. Ch10 can see an opening, NRL will get a sense if they are legit in trying to get through it. Let this year play out with a reworked deal that everyone is happy with then start the negotiations next year when normality has returned and a proper open tender process can be undertaken. NRL would be nuts to agree to any extension under what Ch9 are wanting. The game cant afford less FTA coverage, the game cant afford not to have a competitive bidding environment and the game cant afford to be saddled with a aprtner like Ch9 for another 6 years!

Spot on!
 

colly

Juniors
Messages
1,023
Not so sure about this? One of the big increases in subscribers two years ago was due to all 8 games live I thought?

"Changing the structure to suit Nine would also benefit Fox. The fact it has only six exclusive games is unlikely to impact on the number of subscribers"

However what Nine wants is not entirely stupid. I think, correct if i am wrong the way it works now is Foxtel pay Nine $20 million so Foxtel can silimcast. So if Nine wants exclusionary it should put it's 20 million payment back to Foxtel.. It was big mistake Nine made as their ratings were diminished. Now about wanting only 2 games per week/ maybe entice Ten to have a game a week and make Foxtel go back to their 5 live and exclusive. This seems unlikely for Foxtel so some kind of carrot has to be found.
 
Top