All this drama for such an overrated player.
Tigers are better off to have him gone.
And his A Hole manager.
It’s also very simple to control these A Hole managers.
If the Clubs joined forces they could cripple him by saying any player being managed by him they won’t deal with them.
The choice of Clubs for his players would soon diminish. But problem is the Clubs wouldn’t be united over this.
I think Galvins probably a good kid, a bit spoilt but hes gone his whole juniors being told what a gun he is by everyone so understandable. This is by far more an Issac Moses power play to get one over Benji.
Lachie does what all talented 19 year old halves do, takes some good options and lots of bad ones. He doesent really play to a structure and I think would be a tough one to coach. I said since last year I thought Latu was a better fit for us then Galvin, and thats not cause I think hes a bad a player, hes clearly hugely talented, I just think Latu plays a lot more direct and like a traditional half. I cant even say how galvin plays, its like a mix between 1/6/7.
$1m is way overs for where hes at, like when we offered Stefano $800k last year, weve been fortunate the players knocked us back.
At least he hasnt packed it in, hes still putting in on the field and thats all I ask as a fan.
One of the stupidest things the NRL ever brought in and continue to push. If a player genuinely stays for a lesser salary at a club, then that is on them. The NRL shouldn't be saying how much a club should be paying if the player is willing to take a lesser amount top stay or go somewhere.
TBF it was brought in to stop blatant rorting of the cap, like when Darren Lockyer was apparently on $250k his most of his career, or when Souths signed Latrell for $400k less then we offered, oh what the NRL still allowed that?