Gasnier ....gooooorne

[Bastard Squad]

2UE are saying Minichello is gorn too.

 

[King of the Hill]

I was phoned by a pissed bloke at 3am once. It can be very unsettling...

That does sound a big worrying
You'd hope he was after someone to share a pizza with, not for anything more sinister...

 

[Macca]

The skipper of the national Navy cricket side gets woken up at 3am every time me and 2 other members of the side go out for a drink. Admittedly we don't offer to spurt sauce but drunken phonecalls are exactly that. Let's get some perspective here. Coffs Harbour is the only reason this is front page news. Pure and simple.

I agree it was bad behaviour at the worst possible time but the punishment simply doesn't fit the crime! An apology and a fine were all that was needed here.

 

[Jimbo]

I was phoned by a pissed bloke at 3am once. It can be very unsettling...

That does sound a big worrying
You'd hope he was after someone to share a pizza with, not for anything more sinister...

:lol:

 

[Dragon Slayer]

The woman Minichiello was interested in didn't want to give him her phone number.

Her friend said, look here's my number if you want to ask her out.

And then 6 weeks later her friend got this obscene message from Gasnier who'd she'd never met telling her that she should be servicing himself and 3 other mates.

That's the thanks she gets for offering to help Minichiello meet her friend!!!

How does that make either of them sluts??????????????

They weren't even remotely chasing any of the men in question!!!!!!!!

And Black Tip Reefy I'm sorry to tell you this but your in fantasy land if you think that that's an okay way to treat a woman.

Didn't you say that your longest relationship was 3 hours??????????

Wasn't it until she came out of a coma??????

 

[King of the Hill]

And Black Tip Reefy I'm sorry to tell you this but your in fantasy land if you think that that's an okay way to treat a woman

boo hoo
pass the tissues!!

Didn't you say that your longest relationship was 3 hours??????????

3 hours! Must have been drunk to last that long! Usually :lol:

 

[Macca]

:lol: :lol: :lol:

20 minutes is my record!

 

[blacktip-reefy]

And Black Tip Reefy I'm sorry to tell you this but your in fantasy land if you think that that's an okay way to treat a woman

It's no way to treat anybody whos not in the game.
& if you want to believe that story, go ahead.
There are enough sluts out there already chasing these guys around I am sure that prying a phone number is not required.
I didn't wantto get give him my phonbe number.
oohh...oohh he said he wouldn't touch anything else
oohh..oohhh he said we he just wanted to see what brand my knickers were.
oohh..oohh he said he'd only put half in, he didn't say it was the back half.

 

[DJDL]

Reefy's right, there are plenty of girls out there who leave themselves wide open for this sort of treatment. This is just not one of those instances.

He didn't know the girl. WTF was he thinking?

I say good on her for making it public. It's about time these morons woke up to themselves and started behaving in a responsible manner.

 

[blacktip-reefy]

who says he doesn't know her?
Her boyfreind says that? Her husband?
maybe Gazs girlfreind?
There is nothing wrong with what he did, unless that girl was not known to him.
& I'll back my instincts on this one, as I did with the Coffs harbour lies & say she is very well known.
It's all a case of saving face.

 

[DJDL]

It's all a case of saving face.

Freudian slip with the eyes. I read that as "saving farce" :mrgreen:

 

[Macca]

That's an interesting theory, but that's all it is Reefy. Sure it's possible that she has done this kind of thing before and her partner heard the message and blew up. She told this story to cover it up. You'll need proof to make those sort of claims though. I couldn't care less about her though, it's the ARL and the Blues management that give me the shits. They could have handled this so much better.

 

[blacktip-reefy]

It's not a theory.
It's called process of elimination.
Cross out all the impossibilities & this is what you are left with.
This entire night out I have been on a hundred times in my life.
With exactly the same results & the same lies being told by exactly the same actors.
Why is proof required?
The liar in Coffs harbour need proof to make the claims?
has she been charged for making accusations defaming people & causing mischeif?
If she can get away with load of lies, then nobody required proof to say anything in Australian society anymore.

 

[Macca]

How can you use a process of elimination without any proof? You are comparing this incident with piss up's you have had. That's your first mistake. How can you possibly know all the facts. You weren't there. Look, you may be right but you have exactly the same chance of being wrong. I don't know how you can say it isn't a theory of yours. Do you know this woman? She, whether you agree with me or not, could be telling the truth. Are we supposed to assume she isn't because of your gut instinct? Come on Reefy, how is this not a theory?

 

[blacktip-reefy]

How can you use a process of elimination without any proof? You are comparing this incident with piss up's you have had. That's your first mistake. How can you possibly know all the facts. You weren't there. Look, you may be right but you have exactly the same chance of being wrong. I don't know how you can say it isn't a theory of yours. Do you know this woman? She, whether you agree with me or not, could be telling the truth. Are we supposed to assume she isn't because of your gut instinct? Come on Reefy, how is this not a theory?

Well lets go back & have a look at the hysterical coffs harbour posts on this forum.
All along I said she would be proven to be liar. She was. A thorough liar.
maybe you could link to a few of your theories about Coffs?

My theory as you call it, holds much more substance than the so called truth.
She was in this game for a reason, it wasn't random. Fact.
2.5 million other women in Sydney weren't called that night. Reinforcing fact 1. Similar odds to lotto.
I know personally of a dozen guaranteed starters in the groupie mob, which I assume were way down the list well after this one. Again, shy was she called? fact 2.
A bun is simple process really. Never have i seen a bun take place, until confidence is gained, usually in a one on one situation. Anybody who has been in this situation knows this. Therfore, anybody who would commence confidence building requesting a 4 up would be frowned upon by the others as a spoiler. its just not done & is stupid to think it was. fact 3.
Having spoken to about 20 mates over the last 2 days(experts in this area) & asking what their opinion was over the incedent, they said exactly the same thing without being prompted. ohh the boyfreinds heard the meassage.
This is called expert opinion & is entered in courts as fact. Fact 4. :lol:
I have swayed the probability of being wrong to 80/20 in my favour.


So by placing the existing facts together you get a picture of what really took place.
it's up to her now to come out & show how squeeky clean she is & prove cynics & experts like my mates & me wrong.
But she's a protected species who can pick & choose when she wants to play the game.

 

[Macca]

How can you use a process of elimination without any proof? You are comparing this incident with piss up's you have had. That's your first mistake. How can you possibly know all the facts. You weren't there. Look, you may be right but you have exactly the same chance of being wrong. I don't know how you can say it isn't a theory of yours. Do you know this woman? She, whether you agree with me or not, could be telling the truth. Are we supposed to assume she isn't because of your gut instinct? Come on Reefy, how is this not a theory?

Well lets go back & have a look at the hysterical coffs harbour posts on this forum.
All along I said she would be proven to be liar. She was. A thorough liar.
maybe you could link to a few of your theories about Coffs?

I never said the Dogs were guilty, in fact I maintained that they were innocent until proven guilty. That proof never came, so as far as I am concerned they are innocent.

My theory as you call it, holds much more substance than the so called truth.
She was in this game for a reason, it wasn't random. Fact.

It's possible, maybe even probable, that it wasn't random, not fact. That's just your opinion.

2.5 million other women in Sydney weren't called that night. Reinforcing fact 1. Similar odds to lotto.

Again it's possible that these blokes just got the wrong number.

I know personally of a dozen guaranteed starters in the groupie mob, which I assume were way down the list well after this one. Again, shy was she called? fact 2.

Only the guys in that cab know why she was called.

A bun is simple process really. Never have i seen a bun take place, until confidence is gained, usually in a one on one situation. Anybody who has been in this situation knows this. Therfore, anybody who would commence confidence building requesting a 4 up would be frowned upon by the others as a spoiler. its just not done & is stupid to think it was. fact 3.

There is no doubt stupidity was involved.

Having spoken to about 20 mates over the last 2 days(experts in this area) & asking what their opinion was over the incedent, they said exactly the same thing without being prompted. ohh the boyfreinds heard the meassage.
This is called expert opinion & is entered in courts as fact. Fact 4. :lol:

The only thing that makes something fact in court is proof. Not someones opinion. Especially in this instance. How can any of your experts know for sure that this girl isn't telling the truth.

I have swayed the probability of being wrong to 80/20 in my favour.

Last time I looked 80% confidence meant probable, not fact.

So by placing the existing facts together you get a picture of what really took place.

No you get a possibility of what took place.

it's up to her now to come out & show how squeeky clean she is & prove cynics & experts like my mates & me wrong.
But she's a protected species who can pick & choose when she wants to play the game.

Look I am not ruling out your theory. I think that you could indeed be correct. I am just saying that you are calling this fact when it not. It's just a theory of yours. A reasonably plausible one. Not fact though.

 

[blacktip-reefy]

Well using your logic, Sef Gonzales was abducted by ransomers & hitmen after they killed his parents.

 

[MilitaryShark]

My take on this is, the bloke has not comitted a crime.
Sure if you feel he has brought the game into disrepute (spelling) fine the arse off him, give his match payment for the SOO to a charity of his choice, but why penalise us fans by not letting us watch the best teams run around come state of origin time ?
Thats just my take on the whole affair.
Personally i dont give 2 shits what these guys get upto in their spare time, its only on the field that im interested in.
Cheers

 

[Foz]

How about the theory a player was keen on the girl and got another player to do his dirty work?
No lotto odds there.
A player rings a girl he doesnt know. Why her?
The girl has done nothing wrong.
Some drunk rings her at 3.41am in the morning so she reports it. Good on her.
If there were more people like her they might get the message.
Blokes that ring chicks when they are full of it (instead of ringing when they are sober) are gutless.
Dutch courage? I think not. Gutless? Yes.

 

[blacktip-reefy]

Well I think there a few of us here that know that story is pretty unlikely.

:lol: :lol: