SaraSassypants
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,447
Love Gould but he picked up a few sacked Rabbitohs players. Mansour and Roberts for starters..
Love Gould but he picked up a few sacked Rabbitohs players. Mansour and Roberts for starters..
I think the whole thing is becoming cringeworthy. They should just be treated like normal individuals with normal jobs - not some f**kin super hero footy star who's above all morals.
#.
Take big, dumb kids from low socio-economic backgrounds with low education and no social skills.
In a very short period of time they are getting paid 10 times their peers, therefore lose all value of earning money. They are put on a pedastle by family, friends, fans, media and managers. Thousands of facebook and twitter friends.
The first paragrah plus the second paragraph equals trouble, eventually. And this won't change just because everyone wants to elevate our game above its station. We are and have always been a working class game at heart. I for one hope this never changes, take the (mostly) good with the (occassional) bad.
As in NFL some on these players would be in prison if not for the game.
No excuses as many people in poor areas are hard workers with good ethics.
Neither did anything that would warrant being deregistered though.
So the nrl should sack the whole of cronulla.
Dugan wasn;t convicted of anything was he? If Raiders wanted to put up with him being a fckwit they could have but chose not to. The fact St's have decided they don;t mind employing a fckwit is there own look out.
Different where criminal charges are involved and if serious then lengthy bans should be in place. Having said that they would just move to Union or SL so not like they are being punished that harshly really.
Gross overreaction.
Taking Ferguson as an example why should he be sacked for something that gets most booked either a slap in the face, a drink thrown over them or a smack in the head from the boyfriend..
Love Gould but he picked up a few sacked Rabbitohs players. Mansour and Roberts for starters..
I think there could be a lot of problems with taking this line, although I tend to agree with the idea. There's two scenarios in my mind:
If it involves the judicial system then I think taking this path undermines innocent until proven guilty considerably, a value that many of us defend jealously. In my mind it comes down to "What if we just deregistered a player who the courts later find to be innocent?". Up until the point the court delivers its judgement, I think a player should remain on the books at a club. There is certainly valid reasons to stand them down with pay in the meantime, but we need to defend innocent until proven guilty. If they are found to be guilty - and the appeal period has passed - then come down as hard as we can on them i.e. deregister them, big fines etc etc.
In fact, bail conditions are a similar concept. An interim punishment based on the possibility of guilt.
If it's an internal issue then I think there may be cases where deregistering is appropriate, but I think the clubs and NRL would need to be very transparent in their decision-making process, and there would need to be an appeal process available, ideally overseen by an independent panel.
Let another club either pick them up and deal with their rubbish, or not. If you sign him and he's going off the rails you decide as a club whether he's worth the effort to fix, or not and you either take responsibility for him when you sign him, or you stay out of it - at your decision.
Let the person who's f**ked up either work their way back into contention and prove themselves, or not. Pretty bloody simple I would've thought.
Gross overreaction.
Taking Ferguson as an example why should he be sacked for something that gets most booked either a slap in the face, a drink thrown over them or a smack in the head from the boyfriend..