Cupid Stunt said:
Genuine question before this is down over racisim...
I've always thought (I dont claim to be educated on the subject) that the Haka was a form of intimidation, among other things. If this is in any way so why dont oppositions have the right to walk away or turn their backs or mouth something in return? Why must a team that is psyching themselves be watched by their opponents?
you can and its expected.
the haka you see by the AB,s and kiwis are more traditional challenges that are part and parcel with the teams. Despite getting rubbished, willie mason answered the haka but he showed disrespect which was rightfully punished.
i can remember a haka before an AB v England test match. Norm Hewitt was either in the front or actually leading it and the English hooker fronted up to him midway through the haka. Norm (a maori) had to be held back as did his pommie opposite. great stuff.
in nz, we have maori colleges play each other and it has to be seen to be believed. Sometimes up to 1-200 supporters behind the respective dead ball lines going hard out with haka. sends a shiver down your spine.
recent Aotearoa Moari v Cook Islands league test, haka resulted in an all in scrap.. awesome. thats how you answer a haka, dont back down to it and dont hide behind a team mate/s, a la willie.