What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Hayne~NFL~RU~Tits~Eels~Dad~Jailed~Mistrial~Jailed~Retrial~Jailed~Appeal~Quashed-Sued~Fat Coach

Obscene Assassin

First Grade
Messages
6,320
On the NRL 360 show, he made a point of saying that he was not specifically singling Hayne out. In fact he thereafter referred to him as 'player X'. I'm not defending Kent against people who like to hate people they don't even know; I'm simply saying that he was talking about the inconsistency of the NRL in apparently turning a blind eye in some circumstances and not in others. He mentioned how the NRL notionally valued Israel Folou out of Parramatta's reach, thereby losing him to Rugby Union (but I guess that doesn't fit the narrative of Kent hating Parramatta - whatever that means). The reason he spoke about Hayne in the first place, is fairly obvious I would have thought. Hayne has been a recognised superstar and he is a current state of origin player. But most importantly, he has just walked out on a million dollar per year contract to sign for $500K. It's something that doesn't happen every day. And yet the NRL have not thought to even look into it. And, as Kent pointed out, at a club that was recently caught rorting the salary cap. If it happened at the Broncos or Easts, or Melbourne, we'd all be up in arms. I agree with Paul Kent. The NRL should have at least spoken to Hayne and the Parramatta club to make sure everything was legit - and to make sure any TPA's were 'at arms length'.

Why did he bring it up only when Hayne signed with Parramatta? If he's so concerned about players entering the market to find their true value why was there no article when Ken Edwards re-signed before the 1st of November the year before his contract was set to expire? Why was there no article when Trent Merrin did the same thing at penrith?
 

Gary Gutful

Post Whore
Messages
52,929
In fairness, Hayne is much higher profile than those other examples.

I think Kent has a point but I also think he is out to shaft Hayne as well.
 

Obscene Assassin

First Grade
Messages
6,320
In fairness, Hayne is much higher profile than those other examples.

I think Kent has a point but I also think he is out to shaft Hayne as well.

But we don't buy players for their profile off the field, we buy them for their ability on the field. Some other club that needs their name in the papers every other day would need to pay more for him if that were a reason for signing him.
 

Gary Gutful

Post Whore
Messages
52,929
But we don't buy players for their profile off the field, we buy them for their ability on the field. Some other club that needs their name in the papers every other day would need to pay more for him if that were a reason for signing him.
I was highlighting why Kent may chose to write an article about a high profile player.

It gets clicks.
 

Obscene Assassin

First Grade
Messages
6,320
I was highlighting why Kent may chose to write an article about a high profile player.

It gets clicks.

But his article would hold more weight if it also included other examples of players signing contracts before going on the open market rather than just singling out one player and one club which he seems to single out more of than not.
 

Gary Gutful

Post Whore
Messages
52,929
But his article would hold more weight if it also included other examples of players signing contracts before going on the open market rather than just singling out one player and one club which he seems to single out more of than not.
Sure.

But equally it wouldn't have people talking as much if he diluted it in that way.

A lot of people on here don't like him but I reckon his employers absolutely love him.
 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,979
On the NRL 360 show, he made a point of saying that he was not specifically singling Hayne out. In fact he thereafter referred to him as 'player X'. I'm not defending Kent against people who like to hate people they don't even know; I'm simply saying that he was talking about the inconsistency of the NRL in apparently turning a blind eye in some circumstances and not in others. He mentioned how the NRL notionally valued Israel Folou out of Parramatta's reach, thereby losing him to Rugby Union (but I guess that doesn't fit the narrative of Kent hating Parramatta - whatever that means). The reason he spoke about Hayne in the first place, is fairly obvious I would have thought. Hayne has been a recognised superstar and he is a current state of origin player. But most importantly, he has just walked out on a million dollar per year contract to sign for $500K. It's something that doesn't happen every day. And yet the NRL have not thought to even look into it. And, as Kent pointed out, at a club that was recently caught rorting the salary cap. If it happened at the Broncos or Easts, or Melbourne, we'd all be up in arms. I agree with Paul Kent. The NRL should have at least spoken to Hayne and the Parramatta club to make sure everything was legit - and to make sure any TPA's were 'at arms length'.
When he first brought it up on NRL360 his whole angle on it was, and this is roughly exactly what he said ... how can the nrl let a player go to this club who recently cheated for less money and not launch an investigation into it ... ie. He flat out said we were cheating again

His Folau reference was entirely about losing folau to union, not in the slightest that parra were hard done by.

As everyone already said, as if the NRL hasnt looked into the deal. Infact there was an article after kents meltdown which said the nrl havent even signed off yet but dont seen there being an issue. So basically, they were still looking into it.

Honestly, his rant was so full of shit it makes him hard to take seriously ... Hayne is not a f**kin shadow of what he was ... no club wanted him ... and he obviously wants to be at parra ... he doesnt give a f**k when half a dozen bronco signings take 100k+ less to go there.

I think it is partly what gary said, clickbait ... but also partly pent up dislike of both parra and hayne that made him really give a shit enough to go all beetroot head over it
 

Gary Gutful

Post Whore
Messages
52,929
I think it is partly what gary said, clickbait ... but also partly pent up dislike of both parra and hayne that made him really give a shit enough to go all beetroot head over it
100%.

He knows how to generate interest but it is also clear he f**ken hates Hayne. No doubt Hayne hates him as well.

Personally, I think they are both f**kwits.
 

Noise

Coach
Messages
18,157
Over at nospam07 Phils wants Hayne in the forward pack. Im sure he wanted Seph as our halfback at one stage also.....

And Gutho at 9. The guy is a dead set moron. I'm convinced he knows absolutely nothing about rugby league.
 

Latest posts

Top