- Messages
- 77,887
*handbag
You can emasculate all you like. I've been around too long to be bothered with misogynist shit like that.
*handbag
For sure some people need a bit more situational awareness, but you’re implying people are no longer allowed to change their minds?Didn't she say that, "I don't know if he bit me or cut me or what ……"? I reckon if someone bit my genitals I'd be able to distinguish that from cutting with an object or a fingernail or whatever. Also, she sent him naked pictures of herself and then supposedly didn't expect him to think the encounter was going to be purely sexual in nature. Man, if he'd sent her a bunch of naked pictures of himself, would she think he had anything much other than sex on his mind? Fair go here. It takes two to tango.
You can emasculate all you like. I've been around too long to be bothered with misogynist shit like that.
The big questions there are who and why were they being tapped? I highly doubt they’d get or at least be allowed a phone tap just for this case, and even if the police were, it wouldn’t be until we’ll after the incident when it’d be random for Hayne/Pearce to be discussing itDon't know what this means, but here it is.
Don't know what this means, but here it is.
You and 50,000 other Canberrans.
^^^^
"She's from Newy, bro," Mr Hayne said.
"Newy?" Mr Pearce said.
"Full-blown weirdo, yeah," Mr Hayne said. "A couple of your boys might know her, bro."
Mr Pearce asked for her name and, when Mr Hayne gave it, Mr Pearce responded: "I’ll ask the boys."
==========================
<sigh>
The big questions there are who and why were they being tapped? I highly doubt they’d get or at least be allowed a phone tap just for this case, and even if the police were, it wouldn’t be until we’ll after the incident when it’d be random for Hayne/Pearce to be discussing it
You mean last summer?This was in the previous global warming
Well I was going to ask why the cops would bother... but it seems footballers are dumb enough to continually rehash weeks afterwardsThere was a similar phone conversation recorded in the De Belin case. I presume you can get a phone tap in these circumstances. It was 6 weeks or so after the event.
Well you're not going to protect anyone by relying on sex offenders being convicted after the fact. Prison is great for revenge. Not real useful for protection until we can figure out a way to imprison offenders before they commit the crime.Yeah I'll take that as a compliment. I'm all about protecting my daughter and others from the merkins of this world. Now, if I could only find my cape ...
Beady eyes.Well you're not going to protect anyone by relying on sex offenders being convicted after the fact. Prison is great for revenge. Not real useful for protection until we can figure out a way to imprison offenders before they commit the crime.
Yep, and as she said, sending naked pics doesn't take away her right to say "f**king no" on the day. But now it's not about her rights, it's about convincing a jury that she actually did say no before the incident occurred. Saying no afterwards doesn't count.Didn't she say that, "I don't know if he bit me or cut me or what ……"? I reckon if someone bit my genitals I'd be able to distinguish that from cutting with an object or a fingernail or whatever. Also, she sent him naked pictures of herself and then supposedly didn't expect him to think the encounter was going to be purely sexual in nature. Man, if he'd sent her a bunch of naked pictures of himself, would she think he had anything much other than sex on his mind? Fair go here. It takes two to tango.
She obviously changed her mind. This is about when.For sure some people need a bit more situational awareness, but you’re implying people are no longer allowed to change their minds?