blue bags
First Grade
- Messages
- 9,770
Haynes train's well HungSurely they don’t run another trial if it’s another hung jury?
Well Hungry
Haynes train's well HungSurely they don’t run another trial if it’s another hung jury?
The alleged false complainant also faces that. If she loses he would get a costs order - which would not mean much since she does not have deep pockets.If another re-trial is not pursued, it doesn't mean that Hayne has been found innocent (or that he is guilty), but - depending on the wishes of the alleged victim to keep going through this to pursue some result - Hayne could be still be facing a civil trial with a lower burden of proof.
Or Hungry jury....Hung jury seems somewhat appropriate in the circumstances.
They should call it a tongue juryHung jury seems somewhat appropriate in the circumstances.
Based on reports of the evidence put before the trial/s, I highly doubt that will be something that ever comes into the equation. A loss doing that would open Hayne to all sorts of accusations based on a failure to prove a false allegation...The alleged false complainant also faces that. If she loses he would get a costs order - which would not mean much since she does not have deep pockets.
One would think so.
The DDP are likely to drop it. Imagine the cost to the cost to the tax payer already.a hung jury will be as good as a not guilty for Hayne,
surely that will be the end of it, unless she proceeds with a civil action
Yeah so winding back, he got 5 years in May 2021 (3 years non parole), but went to the appellate court who quashed that verdict and ordered a re-trial. That was this trial and he was found guilty. So I assume the original sentencing applies less time served ? Dunno.Back to jail for him.
Cant he just pay the $4k?Yeah so winding back, he got 5 years in May 2021 (3 years non parole), but went to the appellate court who quashed that verdict and ordered a re-trial. That was this trial and he was found guilty. So I assume the original sentencing applies less time served ? Dunno.
Yeah so winding back, he got 5 years in May 2021 (3 years non parole), but went to the appellate court who quashed that verdict and ordered a re-trial. That was this trial and he was found guilty. So I assume the original sentencing applies less time served ? Dunno.
Hmmmm. Watch this space.The current judge is at liberty to change the sentence.