Djay
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,827
Fullbacks majority of the time are the ones starting your sets off kick returns, so yes wingers can get ragdolled but it doesn't as big of a deal as when your fullback does every set.Wingers can't get ragdolled?
Fullbacks majority of the time are the ones starting your sets off kick returns, so yes wingers can get ragdolled but it doesn't as big of a deal as when your fullback does every set.Wingers can't get ragdolled?
you do it all the time*yawn*
Grammar police
I read enough shit on here, you really think I give one f**k about whether I use "his" or he's" correctly? No.you do it all the time
http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/posts/12204346/
http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/posts/12207630/
they are two totally different words meaning different things
noI read enough shit on here, you really think I give one f**k about whether I use "his" or he's" correctly? No.
If it concerns you so much do not read my posts, you clearly are truly concerned with Parra related issues......
The bloke making the most kick returns is the one they kick to the most, meaning they would kick to French if he was on the wing. And you rather a player get ragdolled in the middle of the field than near the sideline.
Sorry bud.no
you're too f**king stupid to know they're different words that don't even sound the same when you say them
My point is that he will get handled on hit ups so you just have him make as few as possible. You put up with his lack of go forward because you need his attacking ability near the opposition line.I don't get your argument? So don't have Bev at all then cause he gets ragdolled?
Gutherson played fullback against three shitty teams plus the Roosters. He's a solid defender and runner, and a good support player, but we need more attacking ability from our fullback.It's simple and you would have to be blind Freddy to think otherwise, he sets us going backwards at the start of every set, he never returns with any gusto his simply not big enough to get over the top of anyone. I am not saying cut him but Gutherson I believe is much more well rounded to be a good fullback, French not so much. No surprise we won 3/4 games Gutherson was at fullback, he killed it.
French is 21 years old with eight NRL games at fullback. He will be a gun as he learns to read the defence.
Tomkins was no better than French (other than not missing games) in his best year (2014) in the NRL, despite being older and vastly more experienced, and playing outside Johnson/Townsend all year.
In 2014 Tomkins was top 20 for tries and try assists, and top 10 for LBAs. He was a solid attacking contributor. He was only a failure because he would've been in the top 10 highest paid players.
French is not the answer at fullback his too small.
no
you're too f**king stupid to know they're different words that don't even sound the same when you say them
I am completely aware of the point of the play however when it is your only move the defence can read it too easily.The point on that play is for them to come back on the inside.
On the wing he was fine, yes.he was big enough last year
Wingers are bigger than fullbacks. If you're big enough for the wing you're big enough for fullback.On the wing he was fine, yes.