Wristy McSlashalot
Juniors
- Messages
- 329
I'm surprised this hasn't been brought up before especially now that they're playing side by side I think Lockyer is better how bout y'all
Bernster said:I would vote neither...They are both Hasbeens and Prince and Thurston should have been selected ahead of these two nincompoops as far as I am concerned.
Wristy McSlashalot said:I'm surprised this hasn't been brought up before especially now that they're playing side by side I think Lockyer is better how bout y'all
Thurston???:lol: Johns almost single handedly avoided the spoon ofr newcastle. He is bloody amazing player and wasnt brilliant yesterday but certainly better than Lockyer.Bernster said:I would vote neither...They are both Hasbeens and Prince and Thurston should have been selected ahead of these two nincompoops as far as I am concerned.
If they want a ball runner than you can't go past Barrett.rufus youngblood said:Lockyers more burnt out than a set of tyres in lakemba, in his day lockyer could match johns at present lockyer is a passenger in whatever side he plays in and shouldnt be mentioned in the same breath.
If selectors are fair dinkum, John Sutton is the perfect foil to partner johns at 5/8.
He is a ball runner with good hands.WE dont need 2 blokes who want the ball every play and thats why they boyh played crap.
aqua_duck said:If they want a ball runner than you can't go past Barrett.
not necessarily, Anasta runs like a back rower, makes metres but little penetration, Barrett has the speed and power to bust the line and go around the fullback, just ask Karmichael Hunt.dodge said:Anasta is a better ball runner than Barrett... and he's not even in the squad.
mate we'll see Ansta's true colours when he doesn't have Shifty holding his hand. I mean when Shifty was out the attack looked that 1 dimensional it wasn't funny.dodge said:Oh, I fully realise that, he played like a walking vagina in the last month of the comp. See what happens I suppose.