:?
Are you serious?
It should not be at the SFS if we are playing the Roosters.
For any other club in the semis, I have no problems playing it at the SFS.
Regardless of the result? We're talking about finals footy, here - the result is all that matters.
I almost believe you are serious... Winning games, yes. Pandering to small minded ne'er-do-wells? I sure hope not.
A contract doesn't mean sh*t. If money is not an issue (as apparently it's not - because only winning is) then the Tigers could simply repudiate the contract and offer to pay damages...
If they are clever, they'll do just that - then the NRL will come in with an offer of $250K to move to the big ground which we will accept, the SCG Trust will pay us our poxy $100K (or more, if we can talk 'em into it), we'll go on to win the Grand Final and pick up another $250K in prize money, and the club will be at least $600K (+ merchandise and new member revenue) richer for their run in 2010. Which is more than what you can say for the Dragons.
Seriously, I don't know why they don't give me the marketing job...
Stats please. Record at SFS compared with LO and campbelltown.
It's my belief we play better at the bigger grounds. Even ones we've lost like Parra last year, was undoubtably our best performance in recent times.
As it is, we've won 2/2 finals at both ANZ and SFS - the crowd being a deciding factor in each.
No. The likes of yourself and Westie have made it abundantly clear that money and crowd size are more important than the result.
...
& as for the bolded, well if thinking that locking in the SFS before we know who we are playing, which is highly likely to be the Roosters is one of the singlemost geniused ideas the JV has come up with in it's 11 years (& the list of entries is a long one) - Then yes, I am an unashamed small minded ne'er-do-well...
...
I just cannot fathom how you morons can't see that playing a home final at the SFS against the Roosters is mad. It really does boggle the mind.
...
It's not about the traditions or anything like that. I f**king hate Western Suburbs and refuse to attend any JV games at Campbelltown, but if drawn to play the Roosters, i'd schedule the game there in a heartbeat if it were a choice between the Sth West and the SFS.
...
If we hadn't been running into Friday's game with the injury list we have, I wouldn't be so upset by this stupid, stupid decision. It is more likely than not that we will be playing Easts, if as assumed the decision has been made before we know who we are playing, the club is incompetent. Simple as that.
When push comes to shove NC in a tight game a home crowd certainly makes a diference, it can lift players defence as well as sway a referee's call. I guess if a side is on song it shouldnt matter but we havnt been all that brilliant so i wouldnt mind the little bit of home crowd help
Plus players can hear the crowd..lol watch Beu Knows Leichart Oval on youtube.. Its pretty funny
I've played football, meltiger, and I know that it's not the ground that matters, its the crowd.
Guess it's more a matter of opinion than fact, eh?
bullsh*t.
Even at lower levels, where f**k all people turn up, you play better on your own home ground. It feels like home, you know every blade of grass, you know the weather/wind like the back of your hand etc
Anyone who needs the crowd to fire up shouldn't be playing pro football ;-)
To that end, sometimes I do wonder if the Leichhardt crowd is a myth. I absoloutely love the place, but realistically, how much more an advantage would the crowd at Leichhardt be in comparison to say Campbelltown? But no one ever talks up the Campbelltown crowd. Honestly, I think it's a myth
I remember our crowd at the broncos game actually spurred them on for a bit.I was at all four of those finals games in 2005 and whilst the atmosphere was great I can't say that the crowd in any of those games was a deciding factor. We romped home in the first & second matches and then took advantage of our opportunities in the third & fourth.