What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

How many weeks for Nofoaluma?

How many weeks?

  • 0 weeks.

    Votes: 22 75.9%
  • 1-4 weeks.

    Votes: 1 3.4%
  • 5-8 weeks.

    Votes: 1 3.4%
  • 9+ weeks.

    Votes: 5 17.2%

  • Total voters
    29

WaznTheGreat

Referee
Messages
24,298
The zombie apocalypse is upon us,David Nofoaluma has taken his first victim with Wade Graham to carry on his legacy
 

MacDougall

First Grade
Messages
5,744
He won't.

But even if he did, Koroibete is a good replacement. Scored three tries in reserve grade today.
 

nrlnrl

First Grade
Messages
6,833
strange incident

Wade Graham said he'd been bitten, but didn't go on with the complaint & refs said they couldn't see any mark
 
Last edited:

Danish

Referee
Messages
31,875
Biting is like eye gouging or squirrel gripping.

All equally the lowest acts you can commit on a footy field but all are completely swept under the rug by the match review committee unless there is an embarrassing amount of proof.
 

pHyR3

Juniors
Messages
955
i couldn't see nofo do anything, nor could i see anything on graham's face after.

seems like nofo's mouth was near the place graham was complaining about and thats about it....
 
Messages
2,524
Biting is like eye gouging or squirrel gripping.

All equally the lowest acts you can commit on a footy field but all are completely swept under the rug by the match review committee unless there is an embarrassing amount of proof.

Do you propose that Nofoaluma be cited on the basis of Graham's allegation alone? Unless there is a bite mark or video footage to substantiate his allegation, no action should be taken.
 

Snappy

Coach
Messages
11,844
There was no bite. Graham rubbed his face over his mouth, and would have felt some contact with teeth/mouthguard. There was no mark on Grahams face. Nothing in it.
 

innsaneink

Referee
Messages
29,362
Nofa resisted Grahams advances, Graham got all offended and went crying to the ref, claiming assault and seeking an AVO

f**kin girl
 

KeepingTheFaith

Referee
Messages
25,235
There was no bite. Graham rubbed his face over his mouth, and would have felt some contact with teeth/mouthguard. There was no mark on Grahams face. Nothing in it.

This.

Graham is pushing his head down to keep nofo down in the tackle for longer.
 

Danish

Referee
Messages
31,875
Do you propose that Nofoaluma be cited on the basis of Graham's allegation alone? Unless there is a bite mark or video footage to substantiate his allegation, no action should be taken.


This one didn't look so bad, but if you recall other incident such as Moi Moi a couple years back there was clear bite marks to the point of bruising, but with no video showing teeth on skin they let him off.

The only ones I can recall getting decent suspensions were Graham and Morrin, and those had clear as day footage of them going the chomp. Even then Graham should have been sent from the field but remained on because the refs pussied out
 
Messages
4,980
Not just in reference to this one, but why do players make an on-field allegation, and then refuse to make a complaint after the game? And why should a post game complaint be required anyway? Either don't say anything at all, or follow it all the way through.
 

macnaz

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
8,352
Not just in reference to this one, but why do players make an on-field allegation, and then refuse to make a complaint after the game? And why should a post game complaint be required anyway? Either don't say anything at all, or follow it all the way through.

Some players still believe in what happens on the field stays on the field ,
 

Latest posts

Top