What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

I don’t know why but I hate Bailey Simonsson in first grade

No1_Eel

Juniors
Messages
72
He wasn’t our worst tonight but am I not seeing something BA does? I just see him as a NSW cup player even when he has the odd good performance. Do you guys agree?
 

yy_cheng

Coach
Messages
18,734
I think he is better than other centre options we currently have.

Who would you play at centre instead of him?
I really wished Asi had killed it at centre in the NSW cup and could've slid into 1st grade there.

Now he's behind, Guth, Dyl, Moses so no chance of polaying NRL
 
Messages
11,736
Yeah, I dont like him as well but he is better than Rusell at 3.

We should've kept Oppa especially towards the end, Oppa was starting to attack well.
I don't think Oppa wanted to stay. Organised his own contract to play overseas, changes clubs every few years anyway.
 

lucablight

First Grade
Messages
6,510
That's because we let the opposition score too many points, not because we don't score enough.
But if we’d scored more than the opposition than we would have won. Our “good attack” has been wanting on most occasions when the game has been on the line. If our attack was better during the Storm, Sharks, Sea Eagles and Titans games when the match was on the line then we would have won.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,179
But if we’d scored more than the opposition than we would have won.
Or if we'd conceded less ffs. There's no point comparing it just to your opposition because then you can't separate your attack and defence. You need to compare it to the rest of the competition, across all games. That shows our attack is much better than our defence.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,179
If our attack was better during the Storm, Sharks, Sea Eagles and Titans games when the match was on the line then we would have won.
The game was 'on the line' because of all the tries we conceded before that point. That's a much bigger sample of minutes than just the last five.
 

lucablight

First Grade
Messages
6,510
The game was 'on the line' because of all the tries we conceded before that point. That's a much bigger sample of minutes than just the last five.
If the attack was as good as you say we wouldn’t have repeatedly come up short during the moments the games were on the line.
Or if we'd conceded less ffs. There's no point comparing it just to your opposition because then you can't separate your attack and defence. You need to compare it to the rest of the competition, across all games. That shows our attack is much better than our defence.
I’m not saying our attack isn’t better than our defence. I’m saying it hasn’t been good enough to score more points than the opposition 6 out of 10 times so far this season. That’s a fact.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,179
If the attack was as good as you say we wouldn’t have repeatedly come up short during the moments the games were on the line.
No team can score at will whenever they need to. The opposition is also trying to stop them scoring, and they are doing it for the full eighty minutes, not just ‘when the game is on the line’.
 

Latest posts

Top