Captain Apollo
Coach
- Messages
- 15,744
With SBW due to return in Round 5, it got me to thinking what would be the best ideal composition of our interchange bench?
In round 1, we had an interchange bench of FPN, Napa, Aubusson and Mortimer with Guerra having been promoted to the starting side. This meant effectively FPN was used to spell one of Moa or JWH.
In round 2, with SBW's suspension we had Aubusson promoted to start in his place, FPN to start at lock, with a bench of Napa, Guerra, Evans and Mortimer.
So for Round 1 the composition was effectively 2 backrowers (FPN and Aubs), 1 front rower (Napa) and 1 half/hooker (Mortimer). Round 2 was 1 backrower (Guerra), 2 front rowers (Napa and Evans) and 1 half/hooker (Mortimer).
The questions I'd value opinions on:
1. What would be the best composition of our interchange bench positions wise (e.g. 2 front rowers, 1 back rower, 1 half/hooker)?
2. Which players should fill those positions (e.g. Guerra and/or Aubs as the second rower/s)?
In round 1, we had an interchange bench of FPN, Napa, Aubusson and Mortimer with Guerra having been promoted to the starting side. This meant effectively FPN was used to spell one of Moa or JWH.
In round 2, with SBW's suspension we had Aubusson promoted to start in his place, FPN to start at lock, with a bench of Napa, Guerra, Evans and Mortimer.
So for Round 1 the composition was effectively 2 backrowers (FPN and Aubs), 1 front rower (Napa) and 1 half/hooker (Mortimer). Round 2 was 1 backrower (Guerra), 2 front rowers (Napa and Evans) and 1 half/hooker (Mortimer).
The questions I'd value opinions on:
1. What would be the best composition of our interchange bench positions wise (e.g. 2 front rowers, 1 back rower, 1 half/hooker)?
2. Which players should fill those positions (e.g. Guerra and/or Aubs as the second rower/s)?
Last edited: