It’s the sponsored who are happy to take the money and run but get on their high horse when they think they are taking the moral high ground against an individual's views which are very similar to their sponsors that are the hypocrites.
I think people here have said that it is the sponsor dollar most in mind when clubs and leagues object to Folou joining the Dragons. I don't think anyone has objected to that idea.
If you'd like to encourage cash strapped organisations to take on nations about cultural values that are different from ours, because they don't agree with individuals in our culture with those values, then be my guest.
I suspect the organisations will continue to do what is in the interests of their bottom line, the individuals will continue to believe what they believe and feel persecuted, and the nations will keep their cultural values that are different from ours, but it would be great if organisations put moral questions up there with money, individuals reflected on their morals and actions and why others might object to them, and nations accepted that cultural differences might be worth exploring and using to reflect on their own values. I wish you every bit of luck.