What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

JACK WIGHTON

Draginzaaar

Bench
Messages
3,643
If Hook is sacked and Hunt decides to walk, should the Dragons sign Jack Whiton? I would think a Sullivan Whiton halves combo would be great for the Dragons given the chances are that Amone will receive some penalty following his trial and could be out beyond the term of his contract so, it would be prudent to consider this now to avoid further stress with regards to our spine.

If for example, Amone is acquitted or only receives a fine, there is the potential to move him to another position such as lock or center or, simply let him go.

Your thoughts?
You can't say sign. It's attempt to sign. It's not as if no on else is after him.
 

R&WTILLIDIE

First Grade
Messages
5,696
No

It is unlikely Hunt will leave even if Hook is axed, he just posturing in his support of him being captain.

Wighton would also absolutely crash our salary cap and is more on the downside as a player than he was 2 or 3 years ago. If Souths or the Phins wants to spend that much coin then let them.
The difference between us and the top teams is that they can fit multiple big name players like Wighton, lateral, cook etc. meanwhile, the dragons struggle to fit shit merkins like musgrove, Tika masala etc. either other teams are doing something dodgy or we just suck
 

terrydavidson

Juniors
Messages
23
1,1 million 900000 to wighton and200000 ontothei r salarycap raidersoffered1.1and nursedhim over badtimes other wise comp will always favor top teamsGODBLESS SAINTS
 

thebigredv

First Grade
Messages
5,407
I can’t help you there.

But this is it in danish:

1,1 millioner 900.000 til Wighton og 200.000 til de tilbudte lønloftraidere1.1og plejede ham over dårlige tider, andre kloge komp vil altid favorisere tophold GODBLESS SAINTS
Kloge komp vil altid? Yes agree , have been saying that all year.
Lonloftraidere? That’s a big call! Not sure about that.
 

Dragon David

First Grade
Messages
9,314
thanks for lesson in danish iam not great on computer now a obe been following saints for60 years red v for20 bottom line raiders have complained to nrl over deal by theway SARCASM is the cheapest form of wit GODBLESS SAINTS
I feel for the Raiders in this instance. The NRL need to do something to make things fairer. Wighton's reason for signing with Souths is that he wants to be in a team that has more chance of winning a premiership. I say bullshit to that. He just wants to have the high life with Russell (Robin Hood) Crowe and his family of highwaymen.
By saying that, he virtually is saying that the Raiders have no chance of winning a premiership in the next 4 years (when I suppose he will be retiring). His mates at the Raiders will poo poo him and Ricky should drop him to reserves. Wighton has said he doesn't want to play rep footy anymore so nothing for him to prove at the Raiders.

The signings like this just makes the game look bad in my opinion. Only the top 5-6 teams are able to get their marquee guys while the rest battle with the second best to the dregs. The comp should be whittled down to 8 teams as that is the way the top teams end up anyway on the ladder. The rest to purgatory.

There should be a better system like points and draft but we know that that won't happen so just have 8 teams and hooroo NRL for me.

I have had my rant for today. Goodnight!
 

SnowDragon

Juniors
Messages
927
I can’t help you there.

But this is it in danish:

1,1 millioner 900.000 til Wighton og 200.000 til de tilbudte lønloftraidere1.1og plejede ham over dårlige tider, andre kloge komp vil altid favorisere tophold GODBLESS SAINTS

Yeah… but can you pronounce it Muzby! (Go gargle some rocks first mate ;) )
 

SnowDragon

Juniors
Messages
927
I think south’s signing wighton for 300k less next year shows everything that is wrong with the cap.

whichever explanation you take, the cap is meant to evenly distribute talent… it doesn’t! It actually favours performing clubs and clubs doing backroom deals / post career promises. Total BS!
 

Dragon David

First Grade
Messages
9,314
I think south’s signing wighton for 300k less next year shows everything that is wrong with the cap.

whichever explanation you take, the cap is meant to evenly distribute talent… it doesn’t! It actually favours performing clubs and clubs doing backroom deals / post career promises. Total BS!
 

Trifili13

Juniors
Messages
1,135
Yet all we hear is players have a short time playing the game so they want to maximise the amount of money they can make. While we now have a player on his last contract willing to give up $1m over 3 or 4 years, also give up playing SOO which i think pays about 30k per game. Nothing to see here, move along. The salary cap is more of a blight on the game than the refs arbitrarily calling 6 again.
 

blacksafake

First Grade
Messages
9,639
Yet all we hear is players have a short time playing the game so they want to maximise the amount of money they can make. While we now have a player on his last contract willing to give up $1m over 3 or 4 years, also give up playing SOO which i think pays about 30k per game. Nothing to see here, move along. The salary cap is more of a blight on the game than the refs arbitrarily calling 6 again.
He’s apparently very well off as far as money goes so I can understand it.
 

Latest posts

Top