That's down to French Law though, so Betfred don't really have a choice in the matter.
Just betting agencies and casinos based outside New Zealand.Is their a similar law in NZ for betting agencies?
SBW doesn't have to wear the logo but I have no option about buying halal meat... might give Gerard a call.
Vegan diets are halal.You actually do, become a vegan
F...k thatYou actually do, become a vegan
Sounds like a night out in the eastern suburbs, funny that SBW used to play for themYes it is. Gambling, alcohol, homosexuality and pork. Same same.
Its funny the one and only guy that you want your marketing on, has a problem with it ....teheCatalan Dragons don't wear the Betfred logo when playing at home:
So potentially Betfred will be open to making an exception for 1 player, especially as the broadcast, all the boardings around the venue, etc all have Betfred on it.
Sounds like most religions though?and women driving and attending football games? You’d have to be quite a hypocrite to follow a religion that is used in many countries to subjugate and abuse some members of that community. But hey Sonny all good as long as you cover over a company logo right?
Way better than the chess piece logo they have now. It has a lot of personality and character - something the current logo lacks.Another new take on an old emblem
View attachment 35601
I have to agree.I can understand why SBW won't wear the logo, but he's always taken the big pay packets that are partly generated by betting and alcohol sponsorship.
I have to agree.
I wonder when he made this known to the ESL and Toronto? I know he did it before regarding the bank sponsor in RU, but again that seemed to come (made public at least) well after contracts were signed.
Also, I wonder where/how he stores his money if he’s against banks charging interest? Or is it ok for him to get interest?
Him having done so before doesn't mean he's obliged to now. He's entitled to change his views, as is everyone.I can understand why SBW won't wear the logo, but he's always taken the big pay packets that are partly generated by betting and alcohol sponsorship.
I presume it was known before the contract/s were signed otherwise he wouldn't be playing next weekI have to agree.
I wonder when he made this known to the ESL and Toronto? I know he did it before regarding the bank sponsor in RU, but again that seemed to come (made public at least) well after contracts were signed.
Also, I wonder where/how he stores his money if he’s against banks charging interest? Or is it ok for him to get interest?
I can accept that people's views can change, but the thing is that part of his current income is generated by gambling and alcohol sponsorship. That's the inconsistency IMO.Him having done so before doesn't mean he's obliged to now. He's entitled to change his views, as is everyone.
I presume it was known before the contract/s were signed otherwise he wouldn't be playing next week