John Morris

[The Dodger]

if it ain't broke...

 

[Frailty]

Whilst I agree we are a bit light on for centres - Morris is a hooker and will always been a hooker. The only other position I feel he could fill is possibly lock - but that would be if injuries were a factor...

We definitely have a few options next year with Hooker/Halves: Townsend, Graham, Kelly, Morris, DeGois, Robson (eh).

Ideally, I think we need to run it at 6. Kelly 7. Townsend 9. Morris 13. Graham 14. DeGois and NSW Cup Robson.

 

[Plastered]

Ideally, I think we need to run it at 6. Kelly 7. Townsend 9. Morris 13. Graham 14. DeGois and NSW Cup Robson.

If this happened, in the words of Borat - I very excite

 

[glenmoresharkie]

I agree. Robson was a waste of money.

6. Kelly
7. The Chad
9. Morris
13. Graham
14. De Gois

Flanagan and Robson to NSW Cup.

 

[2011]

Remember in the old days Chris McKenna was a second rower and a centre, Preston Campbell was a winger/fullback/half back and Steve Rogers a lock/centre/five eighth. Not to mention, heaven forbid Darren Lockyer was a fullback. To say John Morris couldn't make it as a centre because he has played mainly at hooker is a nothing argument. It is like type casting for footballers.

 

[blacktip-reefy]

agreed. Morris has the ability to play many positions.

 

[webShark]

agreed. Morris has the ability to play many positions.

Agreed.My concern is that he lacks a bit of pace for the centres.Doing well enough as a specialist hooker.For me, lock would be his next best posi.

 

[Notaleaver]

hes the bretter morris

 

[2011]

The larger question is what do we have in the way of centres for 2012. As hard as they try each week, surely we don't think that Best and Pomeroy are top notch? What are the other options?