What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Judiciary Charges 2019

Quicksilver

Bench
Messages
4,359
It was the lowest grade careless high tackle. The judiciary are trying to tell us it wasn’t a careless high tackle

It’s not the job of the ball carrier to ensure they don’t get collected in the face mid tackle

JWH just stood there as the player swung around and hit in to him.

I don’t know what you can expect him to do other than completely disappear.

It wasn’t even careless as he was just standing there.

There was no malice or intent. It was an accident. I don’t see any reason why the judiciary system should be pursuing something like this.

JWH has a poor record but it’s no reason to crucify him for this.
 

BranVan3000

Coach
Messages
12,289
JWH just stood there as the player swung around and hit in to him.

I don’t know what you can expect him to do other than completely disappear.

It wasn’t even careless as he was just standing there.

There was no malice or intent. It was an accident. I don’t see any reason why the judiciary system should be pursuing something like this.

JWH has a poor record but it’s no reason to crucify him for this.
He wasn’t standing. He was running towards Knight, and he accelerated and dipped his shoulder as Knight was falling. Get your facts right at least
 

MilkShark

First Grade
Messages
5,162
JWH just stood there as the player swung around and hit in to him.

I don’t know what you can expect him to do other than completely disappear.

It wasn’t even careless as he was just standing there.

There was no malice or intent. It was an accident. I don’t see any reason why the judiciary system should be pursuing something like this.

JWH has a poor record but it’s no reason to crucify him for this.
What? He was just standing there? OK?

He was there to make the tackle, and didn't attempt to use his arms but instead went in with the shoulder.

Its plain as day.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,191
Scrap the judiciary: James Graham calls for NRL to end ‘embarrassing’ farce
NRL PREMIERSHIP

One of the NRL’s most experienced players has called for the game’s judiciary system to be scrapped entirely.
St George Illawarra veteran James Graham - who has played 180 professional games in Australia and more than 400 worldwide - suggests players be robbed of the right to an appeal process for on-field incidents.

As it stands, the NRL’s match review committee issues a charge sheet after thoroughly watching replays of each game.

Once charged, a player has the right to challenge that in front of a judiciary panel, and the panel then makes the final decision on guilt.

But too often the system causes controversy among pundits and punters, with discrepancies between the MRC and judiciary becoming farcical at times.



$

Should NRL scrap judiciary?

2:48
Graham says the game may be better off without it.

“As a player, as a fan, you want consistencies from it,” he told NRL 360.

“There’s call for an overhaul but I was thinking do you even need a judiciary? Or do you just have them say ‘that’s foul play, you’re banned for one game or banned for two games’ and you don’t get a right to defend yourself.

“I think it’s something that you could look at other examples of other sports and see if it’s worked or not.

“It would definitely end this cycle of will they or won’t they get banned? Because I think it just looks a little bit embarrassing when players get charged then they end up getting off.”

NRL 360 co-host Paul Kent pointed out before this week, a total of 18 players had gone to the judiciary to fight an MRC charge.



$

JWH free to play Finals

1:55
Of those 18, eight had won and 10 had lost.

There’s been countless controversies caused by players getting off too lightly, or not being punished sufficiently by the system.

Retired premiership winner Michael Ennis agrees there needs to be a swift and radical overhaul.

“The system needs to be rissoled completely,” Ennis said.

“It’s been awful. The fact you’ve got Nelson Asofa-Solomona that does that style of (crusher) tackle and doesn’t get charged; you’ve got Sam Burgess who knocks Matt Moylan out cold and gets a fine; then you’ve got a guy, again Sam Burgess, who pulls hair and now he’s missing a semi final.

“We’ve got Viliame Kikau that makes minor contact and misses two weeks; Jake Trbojevic does a spear tackle which is very similar to what Nick Cotric did, and he gets nothing yet Cotric gets three weeks.”

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nr...e/news-story/6c690551826219a538d04cb8f4d301cc
 

carcharias

Immortal
Messages
43,120
Ronaldo should’ve contested his.
It was not even as bad as JWH’s.
I guess the money to pay lawyers etc just isn’t there.
 
Messages
15,478
So I assume that means Uncle Nick wanted Latrell to lose at the judiciary and be suspended for last year's Prelim final. And he wanted Billy Slater to miraculously get off for that blatant shoulder charge and play the GF.

Or do they not fit the narrative?

Shhh, facts don't exist in their world you know that. Also, as far as they are concerned, the judiciary panel was probably comprised of all ex-Roosters players as well - you know those big name ex-Roosters players like Mal Cochrane, Tony Puletua and Dallas Johnson ;) :rolleyes:
 

SDM

First Grade
Messages
7,600
The main lesson learned from last night is that Gaybar is a shit lawyer.
 

TheFrog

Coach
Messages
14,300
It was the lowest grade careless high tackle. The judiciary are trying to tell us it wasn’t a careless high tackle

It’s not the job of the ball carrier to ensure they don’t get collected in the face mid tackle
And they wonder why both crowds and TV ratings are falling steadily.
 

carcharias

Immortal
Messages
43,120
Ricky is not happy
Apparently Ikin quoted him and Ricky didn’t like it.

Pressure is building nicely.
This is gonna get juicy .
 

BadnMean

Juniors
Messages
1,132
Ricky is not happy
Apparently Ikin quoted him and Ricky didn’t like it.

Pressure is building nicely.
This is gonna get juicy .

Classic Ricky distraction. Now no-ones talking about two time eye gouger with a murky past, all focussed on Ricky & his feuds.
 

Tommy Smith

Referee
Messages
21,344
Shhh, facts don't exist in their world you know that. Also, as far as they are concerned, the judiciary panel was probably comprised of all ex-Roosters players as well - you know those big name ex-Roosters players like Mal Cochrane, Tony Puletua and Dallas Johnson ;) :rolleyes:
Indeed. Poor Souths are always so hard done by...

2019 Penalty Counts Won

Souths 15
Eels 13
Cowboys 13
Titans 12
Warriors 12
Knights 11
Raiders 12
Tigers 11
Sharks 10
Dragons 10
Broncos 9
Storm 9
Manly 8
Penrith 7
Bulldogs 5
Roosters 4

So much adversity for Souths. And clearly Uncle Nick has never sent a bown paper bag to the referees. Ever.
 

Latest posts

Top